WELL
Performance-based certification for occupant health
AS9100
International standard for aerospace quality management systems
Quick Verdict
WELL advances building occupant health via performance verification across concepts, while AS9100 ensures aerospace product safety through rigorous QMS and supply chain controls. Organizations adopt WELL for wellness credibility and AS9100 for market access and compliance.
WELL
WELL Building Standard v2
Key Features
- Mandatory on-site performance verification testing
- 10 core concepts for human health
- Preconditions plus point-based Optimizations
- Tiered certifications Bronze to Platinum
- Continuous monitoring compliance pathways
AS9100
AS9100D Quality Management Systems Requirements
Key Features
- Configuration management ensures product integrity
- Product safety controls across entire lifecycle
- Counterfeit parts prevention and detection
- Operational risk management in processes
- Enhanced supplier evaluation and controls
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
WELL Details
What It Is
WELL Building Standard v2 is a performance-based certification framework administered by the International WELL Building Institute (IWBI). It focuses on designing, operating, and verifying buildings to advance human health and well-being. Scope covers new/existing buildings across types like offices, residential, and hospitality. Key approach: evidence-based concepts with mandatory Preconditions and optional Optimizations.
Key Components
- **10 core conceptsAir, Water, Nourishment, Light, Movement, Thermal Comfort, Sound, Materials, Mind, Community (plus Innovation).
- 24 Preconditions, 102 Optimizations totaling up to 110 points.
- Built on public health/building science research.
- Certification model: all Preconditions met + points for tiers (Bronze 40, Silver 50, Gold 60, Platinum 80 points) with concept minimums.
Why Organizations Use It
Drives occupant health, productivity, ESG reporting, higher rents/values. Complements LEED for people-first focus. Mitigates health risks, boosts talent retention/reputation. Voluntary but tenant-demanded.
Implementation Overview
Phased: gap analysis, scorecard, documentation, on-site verification, recertification every 3 years. Cross-functional teams for new/existing buildings globally. Requires third-party review/testing; suits all sizes via Core/Residential paths.
AS9100 Details
What It Is
AS9100D (AS9100:2016) is the global quality management system (QMS) certification standard for aviation, space, and defense (ASD) organizations. It extends ISO 9001:2015 with 100+ aerospace-specific requirements. Its purpose is ensuring product safety, configuration integrity, and supply chain reliability in high-consequence industries. The methodology is process-based, risk-oriented, and follows a 10-clause Annex SL structure.
Key Components
- Operational controls (Clause 8): configuration management, product safety, counterfeit prevention.
- **Dual risk managementstrategic (Clause 6) and operational (Clause 8).
- Human factors and enhanced supplier controls.
- Third-party certification via Stage 1/2 audits, with annual surveillance.
Why Organizations Use It
- Mandated by OEMs for supplier approval and market access via OASIS.
- Reduces defects, rework, and delivery delays; improves ROI.
- Mitigates safety risks and builds customer/regulatory trust.
- Drives competitive edge in ASD supply chains.
Implementation Overview
Phased: gap analysis, process design, training, internal audits, certification. Suits all ASD organization sizes globally; 6-18 months typical, emphasizing evidence-based continual improvement.
Key Differences
| Aspect | WELL | AS9100 |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Occupant health, well-being, IEQ across 10 concepts | Quality management, product safety, supply chain in aerospace |
| Industry | All buildings, offices, residential globally | Aviation, space, defense organizations worldwide |
| Nature | Voluntary performance-based certification | Voluntary QMS certification with aerospace additions |
| Testing | On-site performance verification, continuous monitoring | Stage 1/2 audits, annual surveillance, recertification |
| Penalties | Loss of certification, no legal penalties | Certification suspension, market access loss |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about WELL and AS9100
WELL FAQ
AS9100 FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...
SOC 2 Trust Services Criteria in Plain English: Side-by-Side Decoder for Security, Availability, and Beyond
Decode AICPA Trust Services Criteria from auditor jargon to plain English with side-by-side tables, analogies & TL;DRs. CISOs & founders: implement SOC 2 contro
ISO 27701 2025 Update: Navigating Standalone Certification Myths, Audit Realities, and a 90-Day PIMS Launch Plan
Debunk ISO 27701 2025 standalone certification myths vs ISO 27001. Get a 90-day PIMS launch roadmap, checklists & audit prep to certify faster amid global priva
Scaling Compliance: How Modern Tools Transform Lean Teams into Regulatory Powerhouses
Discover how compliance monitoring tools empower lean teams to automate real-time checks, ensure GDPR/HIPAA/SOC 2 compliance, and scale oversight efficiently. T
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
BREEAM vs AS9120B
Compare BREEAM vs AS9120B: BREEAM excels in sustainable building certification across energy, health & ecology; AS9120B ensures aerospace distributor quality via traceability & counterfeit prevention. Choose wisely for compliance—explore now!
POPIA vs SOX
Discover POPIA vs SOX: Compare South Africa's GDPR-aligned privacy law with US financial controls. Uncover key differences in data rights, security safeguards, and governance. Master compliance now.
GDPR vs SOC 2
Unpack GDPR vs SOC 2: EU mandatory privacy law vs US voluntary security audit. Compare scopes, fines, controls & compliance for global data trust.