WELL
Performance-based certification for occupant health in buildings
EMAS
EU voluntary scheme for environmental management and audit
Quick Verdict
WELL certifies buildings for occupant health via performance testing, while EMAS is an EU voluntary scheme for environmental management with verified public statements. Companies adopt WELL for wellness differentiation; EMAS for compliance credibility and efficiency gains.
WELL
WELL Building Standard v2
Key Features
- Mandatory on-site performance verification testing
- 10 concept-based framework for occupant health
- Preconditions plus point-earning optimizations
- Certification tiers with concept minimums
- Continuous monitoring compliance pathways
EMAS
Eco-Management and Audit Scheme Regulation (EC) No 1221/2009
Key Features
- Validated public environmental statements
- Independent verifier legal compliance checks
- Core performance indicators for comparability
- Initial environmental review of aspects
- Continuous improvement via PDCA cycle
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
WELL Details
What It Is
WELL Building Standard v2 is a performance-based certification framework administered by the International WELL Building Institute (IWBI). It focuses on designing, operating, and verifying buildings to advance human health and well-being through evidence-based strategies. Its people-first approach emphasizes measurable indoor environmental quality outcomes via 10 core concepts like Air, Water, and Mind, using mandatory Preconditions and optional Optimizations.
Key Components
- **10 conceptsAir, Water, Nourishment, Light, Movement, Thermal Comfort, Sound, Materials, Mind, Community (plus Innovation).
- 24 Preconditions and 102 Optimizations totaling up to 110 points.
- Built on public health research and building science.
- **Tiered certificationBronze (40 points), Silver (50), Gold (60), Platinum (80), with concept minimums at higher levels.
Why Organizations Use It
Enhances occupant health, productivity, and ESG reporting; complements LEED for dual benefits. Drives talent retention, higher rents, reduced absenteeism. Builds stakeholder trust via verified performance; voluntary but strategically vital for competitive differentiation.
Implementation Overview
Phased approach: gap analysis, scorecard development, documentation, on-site verification, recertification every 3 years. Applies to new/existing buildings across sectors; requires cross-functional teams, third-party testing, continuous monitoring.
EMAS Details
What It Is
EMAS (Eco-Management and Audit Scheme) is the EU's flagship voluntary environmental management regulation under Regulation (EC) No 1221/2009. It helps organizations evaluate, report, and improve environmental performance through a structured EMS aligned with ISO 14001 plus added transparency and verification.
Key Components
- **PillarsPerformance (core indicators), Transparency (public statements), Credibility (independent verification).
- **Core elementsInitial environmental review, EMS (Annex II), internal audits (Annex III), validated environmental statement (Annex IV).
- Built on PDCA cycle; requires legal compliance proof and employee involvement.
- **Registration modelSite-based via national Competent Bodies after verifier validation.
Why Organizations Use It
- Drives resource efficiency and cost savings.
- Ensures verified legal compliance reducing risks.
- Boosts procurement advantages and ESG reporting.
- Builds stakeholder trust via public transparency.
Implementation Overview
- Phased: Review, EMS design, audits, verification (12-18 months typical).
- Applies to all sizes/sectors in EU; SME derogations available.
- Requires accredited verifier audits and annual statements.
Key Differences
| Aspect | WELL | EMAS |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Occupant health across 10 concepts (air, water, mind) | Environmental management, performance indicators, legal compliance |
| Industry | Buildings, all types globally (offices, residential) | All sectors, EU-focused (manufacturing, services, public) |
| Nature | Voluntary performance-based certification | Voluntary EU Regulation with verified reporting |
| Testing | On-site performance verification, continuous monitoring | Internal audits, external verifier validation annually |
| Penalties | Loss of certification, no legal penalties | Registration suspension/deletion, no direct fines |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about WELL and EMAS
WELL FAQ
EMAS FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...
CMMC Level 3 Implementation Guide: Integrating NIST SP 800-172 Enhanced Controls for APT Defense
Step-by-step CMMC Level 3 guide for DIB contractors. Implement 24 NIST SP 800-172 controls on Level 2. Prep for DIBCAC, C3PAO scoping & 180-day POA&Ms. Boost cy
NIST CSF 2.0 Deep Dive: Mastering the Updated Framework Core Functions
Unpack NIST CSF 2.0's enhanced Core Functions: Govern, Identify, Protect, Detect, Respond, Recover. Get SME playbooks, governance shifts & strategies for cyber
Beyond the Burden: How Intuitive Compliance Software Transforms Daily Workflows
Explore intuitive compliance software that automates workflows, simplifies onboarding, and reduces stress. Cut non-compliance costs 3x and boost efficiency for
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
IEC 62443 vs Australian Privacy Act
Compare IEC 62443 vs Australian Privacy Act: Align industrial cybersecurity standards with privacy laws for OT resilience. Key insights on zones, SLs, APP 11 security. Boost compliance now!
AEO vs SOX
Compare AEO vs SOX: Customs security certification vs financial controls law. Slash inspections, audits & costs for trade efficiency. Unlock expert strategies today.
TOGAF vs HITRUST CSF
Compare TOGAF vs HITRUST CSF: EA framework for strategy-IT alignment meets certifiable security controls. Boost compliance, reuse, and ROI. Discover the best fit now!