WELL
Certification standard for building occupant health outcomes
ISO/IEC 42001:2023
International standard for AI management systems
Quick Verdict
WELL certifies buildings for occupant health via performance testing across 10 concepts, while ISO/IEC 42001:2023 governs AI systems through risk assessments and lifecycle controls. Companies adopt WELL for wellness differentiation; ISO 42001 for ethical AI compliance and trust.
WELL
WELL Building Standard v2
Key Features
- Requires mandatory on-site performance verification testing
- Organized around 10 core human health concepts
- 24 pass/fail Preconditions plus 102 Optimizations
- Tiered certifications Bronze to Platinum with balances
- Supports continuous monitoring compliance pathways
ISO/IEC 42001:2023
ISO/IEC 42001:2023 Artificial Intelligence Management Systems
Key Features
- PDCA framework for AI lifecycle governance
- Mandatory AI Impact Assessments for high-risk systems
- Annex A with 38 AI-specific controls
- HLS integration with ISO 27001 and 9001
- Third-party risk management and monitoring
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
WELL Details
What It Is
The WELL Building Standard v2, administered by the International WELL Building Institute (IWBI), is a performance-based certification framework. It advances human health and well-being in buildings via evidence-based design, operations, and policies. Scope includes new/existing buildings across offices, residential, hospitality. Key approach: mandatory Preconditions for baselines, optional Optimizations for points, enforced by on-site verification.
Key Components
- **10 core conceptsAir, Water, Nourishment, Light, Movement, Thermal Comfort, Sound, Materials, Mind, Community (plus Innovation)
- 24 Preconditions (pass/fail), 102 Optimizations (points), 6 Innovation options
- Grounded in health science and building research
- Tiers: Bronze (40 points), Silver (50, min 1/concept), Gold (60, min 2), Platinum (80, min 3)
Why Organizations Use It
- Boosts productivity, retention, ESG reporting
- Commands higher rents, asset values
- Complements LEED for holistic sustainability
- Mitigates health risks, builds trust
- Voluntary yet differentiates competitively
Implementation Overview
- Phased: gap analysis, scorecard, documentation, verification, recertification
- Cross-functional: design, ops, HR; third-party testing
- Global applicability, all sizes/types
- Enrollment, reviews, on-site PV every 3 years
ISO/IEC 42001:2023 Details
What It Is
ISO/IEC 42001:2023 is the world's first international standard for Artificial Intelligence Management Systems (AIMS). It specifies requirements to establish, implement, maintain, and improve responsible AI governance across the full lifecycle, using a PDCA (Plan-Do-Check-Act) methodology and risk-based approach applicable to any organization developing, providing, or using AI.
Key Components
- Clauses 4-10: Context, leadership, planning, support, operation, evaluation, improvement
- **Annex A38 AI-specific controls addressing bias, transparency, integrity, resiliency
- Built on High-Level Structure (HLS) for seamless integration with ISO 27001, 9001
- Third-party certification model with audits and surveillance
Why Organizations Use It
- Mitigates AI risks like algorithmic bias, model drift, ethical issues
- Aligns with EU AI Act, NIST AI RMF, global regulations
- Drives innovation, trust, reputation, competitive differentiation
- Enhances stakeholder confidence, supply chain resilience, SDG alignment
Implementation Overview
- Phased: Gap analysis, AIIAs, training, lifecycle controls, monitoring
- Typical 6-12 months; faster (4-6) with existing ISO systems
- Universal for all sizes, sectors, AI roles (providers/users)
- Requires accredited audits, continual KPIs, documented processes
Key Differences
| Aspect | WELL | ISO/IEC 42001:2023 |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Occupant health, 10 concepts (Air, Water, etc.) | AI management system, lifecycle risks/ethics |
| Industry | All buildings, global, new/existing | All AI users/providers, global, any sector |
| Nature | Voluntary performance certification | Voluntary AIMS certification standard |
| Testing | On-site performance verification, annual reporting | Third-party audits, AI impact assessments |
| Penalties | Loss of certification, no legal penalties | Loss of certification, no legal penalties |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about WELL and ISO/IEC 42001:2023
WELL FAQ
ISO/IEC 42001:2023 FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...
SOC 2 Trust Services Criteria in Plain English: Side-by-Side Decoder for Security, Availability, and Beyond
Decode AICPA Trust Services Criteria from auditor jargon to plain English with side-by-side tables, analogies & TL;DRs. CISOs & founders: implement SOC 2 contro
NIST CSF 2.0 Supply Chain Risk Management: Complete Playbook with Profiles, Tiers, and Vendor Assessment Templates
Master NIST CSF 2.0 ID.SC supply chain risk management with vendor assessment templates, profile gap analysis, and tier strategies. Mitigate third-party threats
CIS Controls v8.1, Operationalized: Top 10 Reasons Compliance Monitoring Software Accelerates Real-World Implementation
Operationalize CIS Controls v8.1 with compliance monitoring software. Turn checklists into dashboards, tickets, and audit-proof workflows. Top 10 reasons it acc
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
SOC 2 vs ISO 30301
Compare SOC 2 vs ISO 30301: SOC 2 audits secure data controls for SaaS trust; ISO 30301 builds records governance. Unlock key differences, benefits & choose wisely today!
ISO 27018 vs ISO 41001
Discover ISO 27018 vs ISO 41001: Cloud PII privacy meets FM excellence. Compare scopes, controls & benefits for compliance. Unlock insights now!
ISO 31000 vs LEED
Discover ISO 31000 vs LEED: Risk guidelines vs green building certification. Compare frameworks, integrate for resilient projects, and elevate compliance + sustainability now!