GRADUM
    FeaturesMaturity ModelsFor CreatorsPricingBlogCompareSupport
    DashboardSign Up Free
    Blog/Compare/AS9120B vs ISO 56002
    Standards Comparison

    AS9120B vs ISO 56002

    AS9120B

    Mandatory
    2016

    Aerospace QMS standard for distributors and stockists

    VS

    ISO 56002

    Voluntary
    2019

    International guidance for innovation management systems

    Quick Verdict

    AS9120B ensures quality in aerospace distribution via rigorous traceability and audits for supply chain approval. ISO 56002 guides innovation systems for value creation across industries. Distributors adopt AS9120B for market access; others use ISO 56002 for strategic capability.

    Quality Management

    AS9120B

    AS9120B:2016 Quality Management Systems for Distributors

    Cost
    €€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    6-12 months

    Key Features

    • Prevents counterfeit and suspected unapproved parts
    • Ensures traceability for split lots and inventory
    • Mandates approved external provider controls
    • Implements configuration management in distribution
    • Requires product safety and ethics awareness
    Innovation Management

    ISO 56002

    ISO 56002:2019 Innovation management system guidance

    Cost
    €€€
    Complexity
    Medium
    Implementation Time
    12-18 months

    Key Features

    • PDCA cycle aligned management system structure
    • Top management leadership commitment requirements
    • Portfolio governance and uncertainty management
    • Performance evaluation with KPIs and audits
    • Integration with HLS/HS ISO standards

    Detailed Analysis

    A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

    AS9120B Details

    What It Is

    AS9120B:2016 is a certification standard for quality management systems (QMS) tailored to aerospace distributors that procure, store, split, and resell parts without alteration. Built on ISO 9001:2015's high-level structure, it adds over 100 distributor-specific requirements using a risk-based thinking approach to address supply chain vulnerabilities.

    Key Components

    • Core clauses: context, leadership, planning, support, operation, evaluation, improvement.
    • Pillars: traceability, counterfeit prevention, external provider controls, configuration management, preservation.
    • Over 100 aerospace additions beyond ISO 9001.
    • Certification via IAQG-accredited bodies with OASIS registration.

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Enables market access to OEMs and primes.
    • Mitigates risks like traceability loss and counterfeits.
    • Builds customer trust through auditable chain-of-custody.
    • Drives efficiency, reduces nonconformities, enhances competitiveness.

    Implementation Overview

    • Phased: gap analysis, process design, training, audits (6-12 months).
    • Applies to aviation/space/defense distributors globally.
    • Requires internal audits, management reviews, Stage 1/2 certification.

    ISO 56002 Details

    What It Is

    ISO 56002:2019 is an international guidance standard titled Innovation management — Innovation management system — Guidance. It provides a framework for organizations to establish, implement, maintain, and improve an Innovation Management System (IMS). The primary purpose is to enable systematic value creation through innovation, applicable to all organization types, sizes, and sectors. It follows a PDCA (Plan-Do-Check-Act) cycle and High-Level Structure (HLS) for integration with other ISO standards.

    Key Components

    • Seven core clauses: context, leadership, planning, support, operation, performance evaluation, improvement.
    • Eight principles: value realization, future-focused leadership, strategic direction, culture, portfolio thinking, uncertainty management, learning, stakeholder engagement.
    • Non-prescriptive; no fixed controls, emphasizes tailored processes.
    • Conformity via self-assessment or third-party audits; not formally certifiable like requirements standards.

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Drives strategic innovation governance and portfolio discipline.
    • Reduces 'innovation theater' and zombie projects.
    • Enhances competitiveness, risk management, stakeholder trust.
    • Integrates with ISO 9001, 27001 for efficiency.
    • Voluntary, but boosts credibility for partnerships, investors.

    Implementation Overview

    • Phased: awareness, gap analysis, design, pilot, scale, sustain.
    • Involves leadership policy, processes, KPIs, audits.
    • Suited for established organizations; scalable for SMEs.
    • No mandatory certification; optional external assurance.

    Key Differences

    AspectAS9120BISO 56002
    ScopeAerospace distribution QMS, traceability, counterfeit preventionGeneric innovation management system guidance, value creation
    IndustryAerospace distributors globally, all sizesAll industries/sectors worldwide, established organizations
    NatureCertification quality standard based on ISO 9001Voluntary guidance, non-certifiable framework
    TestingIAQG audits, internal audits, certification surveillanceInternal audits, management reviews, maturity assessments
    PenaltiesLoss of certification, market exclusionNo formal penalties, internal performance risks

    Scope

    AS9120B
    Aerospace distribution QMS, traceability, counterfeit prevention
    ISO 56002
    Generic innovation management system guidance, value creation

    Industry

    AS9120B
    Aerospace distributors globally, all sizes
    ISO 56002
    All industries/sectors worldwide, established organizations

    Nature

    AS9120B
    Certification quality standard based on ISO 9001
    ISO 56002
    Voluntary guidance, non-certifiable framework

    Testing

    AS9120B
    IAQG audits, internal audits, certification surveillance
    ISO 56002
    Internal audits, management reviews, maturity assessments

    Penalties

    AS9120B
    Loss of certification, market exclusion
    ISO 56002
    No formal penalties, internal performance risks

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Common questions about AS9120B and ISO 56002

    AS9120B FAQ

    ISO 56002 FAQ

    You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

    HITRUST CSF MyCSF Platform Mastery: Infograph of Evidence Tagging Workflows and Top 5 Maturity Tier Acceleration Takeaways

    HITRUST CSF MyCSF Platform Mastery: Infograph of Evidence Tagging Workflows and Top 5 Maturity Tier Acceleration Takeaways

    Master MyCSF platform with infographics on evidence tagging for 1,400+ HITRUST controls across 19 domains. Cut documentation by 30%, boost Measured/Managed tier

    The Tool Landscape for Reaching and Maintaining ISO 27001 Compliance

    The Tool Landscape for Reaching and Maintaining ISO 27001 Compliance

    Discover top ISO 27001 compliance tools, their pros/cons, implementation steps, costs, and benefits. Streamline your path to certification and ongoing complianc

    NIST CSF 2.0: Key Enhancements and How They Address Evolving Cyber Threats

    NIST CSF 2.0: Key Enhancements and How They Address Evolving Cyber Threats

    Explore NIST CSF 2.0 updates: Govern function, supply chain security, SME playbooks for ransomware & AI threats. Boost your cyber defenses now!

    Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

    Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

    Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

    100+ Standards & Regulations
    AI-Powered Insights
    Collaborative Assessments
    Actionable Recommendations

    Explore More Comparisons

    See how AS9120B and ISO 56002 compare against other standards

    Other AS9120B Comparisons

    • ISO 55001 vs AS9120B
    • J-SOX vs AS9120B
    • AS9120B vs AS9110C
    • AS9120B vs ISO 21001
    • Six Sigma vs AS9120B

    Other ISO 56002 Comparisons

    • PMBOK vs ISO 56002
    • ISO 56002 vs ISO 28000
    • ISO 56002 vs Basel III
    • C-TPAT vs ISO 56002
    • ISO 56002 vs ISO 30301
    GRADUM

    Transform your assessment process with collaborative, AI-powered maturity evaluations that deliver actionable insights.

    Navigation

    FeaturesMaturity ModelsFor CreatorsPricing

    Legal

    Terms and ConditionsPrivacy PolicyImprintCopyright PolicyCookie Policy

    © 2026 Gradum. All Rights Reserved