What is the primary objective of **COBIT**?

**COBIT's primary objective is to help organizations create value from I&T, manage risk, and optimize resources through enterprise governance and management (EGIT).** COBIT 2019 provides a core model of **40 governance and management objectives** across five domains (**EDM**, **APO**, **BAI**, **DSS**, **MEA**), supported by **six governance system principles** and **seven components** (processes, structures, information, etc.). It uses a **goals cascade** to translate stakeholder needs into enterprise goals and alignment goals, enabling tailored, dynamic governance systems via **11 design factors**.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **COBIT**?

**No organizations are legally required to comply with COBIT, as it is a voluntary framework developed by ISACA, not a regulation.** Professionally, it is recommended for enterprises relying on I&T for value creation, risk management, and resource optimization, particularly in regulated sectors like finance and utilities. Boards, executives, and GRC professionals use it to demonstrate EGIT maturity, often aligning with external obligations through its **MEA domain** and interoperability principles.

Does **COBIT** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**COBIT does not require external audits or third-party certification, as it is a framework, not a certifiable standard.** Organizations may conduct internal capability assessments using the **CMMI-based performance management model** (levels 0-5). ISACA offers individual certificates (**COBIT 2019 Foundation**, **Design & Implementation**), and **MEA04 Managed Assurance** supports voluntary assurance activities for evidence-driven monitoring.

How often should an assessment for **COBIT** be performed?

**COBIT assessments should be performed periodically based on organizational context, typically annually or aligned with business changes, using the CMMI-based capability levels (0-5).** The **dynamic governance system principle** requires ongoing monitoring via **MEA objectives**, with formal gap analyses (e.g., via design factors and goals cascade) during strategy reviews, risk updates, or post-implementation to track improvements in prioritized objectives.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **COBIT**?

**Non-compliance with COBIT carries no direct legal penalties, as it is a voluntary framework.** Indirect consequences include increased operational risks, poor I&T alignment with enterprise goals, audit deficiencies, and failure to optimize resources or manage threats. Weak EGIT may expose organizations to regulatory scrutiny in aligned areas, reputational damage, or suboptimal value from I&T investments.

An **COBIT** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, COBIT 2019 explicitly supports mapping to other international frameworks through its governance framework principles emphasizing alignment.** Its **openness and flexibility** principle, **40 objectives**, and components enable integration as an umbrella model, with ISACA resources providing crosswalks for standards, regulations, and methodologies.

What is the first step to begin implementing **COBIT**?

**The first step to implement COBIT is to evaluate stakeholder needs and enterprise context using the goals cascade and 11 design factors.** This initiates the **governance system design workflow** (per COBIT 2019 Design Guide), assessing current capabilities via **performance management** to define a tailored scope of objectives and target levels.

What is the primary objective of **AS9100**?

**AS9100's primary objective is to establish a quality management system (QMS) for aviation, space, and defense organizations that ensures product safety, configuration integrity, and supply chain reliability.** It builds on ISO 9001:2015 with over 100 aerospace-specific requirements, including Clause 8.1.2 configuration management, 8.1.3 product safety, and 8.1.4 counterfeit parts prevention, to mitigate risks in high-consequence environments.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **AS9100**?

**AS9100 applies to organizations that design, develop, manufacture, or service aviation, space, and defense products.** Major OEMs and primes require certification as a supplier qualification condition, listed in the IAQG OASIS database; it covers manufacturers, material suppliers, design centers, and excludes distributors (AS9120) or MRO (AS9110).

Does **AS9100** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**Yes, AS9100 requires accredited third-party certification via Stage 1 (readiness/documentation) and Stage 2 (implementation/effectiveness) audits.** Certification is maintained through annual surveillance audits and recertification every three years by IAQG-approved bodies, verifying process effectiveness with objective evidence.

How often should an assessment for **AS9100** be performed?

**AS9100 requires internal audits at planned intervals per Clause 9.2, typically risk-based and covering all processes annually.** External surveillance audits occur annually, with full recertification every three years; management reviews (Clause 9.3) evaluate performance periodically.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **AS9100**?

**Non-compliance with AS9100 risks certification suspension, loss of OASIS listing, and exclusion from OEM supply chains.** It leads to major nonconformities requiring corrective actions within 60–90 days, potential contract termination, and safety incidents from failures in configuration, product safety, or counterfeit controls.

An **AS9100** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, AS9100D aligns with ISO 9001:2015's Annex SL 10-clause structure, enabling integrated management systems.** It supports mapping to standards sharing this framework, with compatible processes for risk-based thinking, leadership, and performance evaluation.

What is the first step to begin implementing **AS9100**?

**The first step is to perform a gap analysis against AS9100D clauses, mapping current processes to requirements like Clause 4 context and aerospace additions in Clause 8.** Define QMS scope (Clause 4.3), identify gaps in configuration management and supplier controls, and develop a prioritized implementation plan.

COBIT vs AS9100

Standards Comparison

COBIT

Voluntary

2019

IT governance framework aligning strategy, risk, and value creation

AS9100

Mandatory

2016

International standard for aerospace quality management systems.

Quick Verdict

COBIT provides enterprise I&T governance frameworks for all industries, while AS9100 is a certification standard for aerospace quality management. Organizations adopt COBIT for risk-optimized IT value; AS9100 for safety-critical supply chain compliance and market access.

IT Governance

COBIT

COBIT 2019 Governance and Management Objectives

Cost

€€€€

Complexity

High

Implementation Time

12-18 months

Key Features

Tailored governance using 11 design factors and workflow
40 objectives across 5 domains separating governance-management
CMMI-based performance management with 0-5 capability levels
Goals cascade linking stakeholder needs to practices-metrics
Holistic 7 components including processes and organizational structures

Quality Management

AS9100

AS9100D Quality Management Systems Requirements

Cost

€€€€

Complexity

High

Implementation Time

12-18 months

Key Features

Configuration management for product integrity
Product safety planning across lifecycle
Counterfeit parts prevention controls
Operational risk management processes
Enhanced supplier evaluation and controls

Detailed Analysis

A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

COBIT Details

What It Is

COBIT 2019 is an ISACA framework for enterprise IT governance and management. It translates stakeholder needs into actionable objectives via a tailored, holistic approach focused on value creation, risk optimization, and resource use. Key methodology includes design factors and goals cascade.

Key Components

40 governance/management objectives in 5 domains: EDM, APO, BAI, DSS, MEA.
6 governance system principles and 3 framework principles.
7 components: processes, structures, information, culture, skills, policies, infrastructure.
CMMI-based performance management (levels 0-5); no formal certification but capability assessments.

Why Organizations Use It

Aligns IT with business strategy for value and agility.
Enhances compliance (SOX, GDPR mappings) and audit readiness via MEA.
Manages risks in digital transformation, cloud, AI.
Builds board trust through measurable outcomes and interoperability with ITIL, NIST.

Implementation Overview

Phased: assess gaps, design via 11 factors, pilot objectives, build capabilities, monitor via MEA. Suits enterprises any size/industry; voluntary with ISACA training (Foundation, Design & Implementation).

AS9100 Details

What It Is

AS9100D (AS9100:2016) is the international quality management system (QMS) standard for aviation, space, and defense organizations. It builds on ISO 9001:2015 with over 100 aerospace-specific requirements, using a process-based, risk-focused approach across 10 clauses.

Key Components

Core pillars: context, leadership, planning, support, operation, evaluation, improvement.
Aerospace additions: configuration management (8.1.2), product safety (8.1.3), counterfeit prevention (8.1.4), operational risks (8.1.1).
Built on Annex SL structure; requires certification via accredited third-party audits (Stage 1/2, surveillance).

Why Organizations Use It

Mandated by OEMs for supply chain access.
Reduces defects, improves delivery, ensures safety.
Enhances risk management, supplier controls, market visibility via OASIS.
Builds stakeholder trust in high-consequence industries.

Implementation Overview

Phased: gap analysis, process design, training, internal audits, certification (6-18 months).
Applies to manufacturers, designers, MROs globally.
Involves documented processes, KPIs, continual improvement.

Key Differences

Aspect	COBIT	AS9100
Scope	Enterprise I&T governance and management	Aerospace quality management systems
Industry	All industries worldwide	Aviation, space, defense sectors
Nature	Voluntary governance framework	Certification quality standard
Testing	Capability assessments and audits	Stage 1/2 certification audits
Penalties	No legal penalties	Loss of certification and contracts

Scope

COBIT

Enterprise I&T governance and management

AS9100

Aerospace quality management systems

Industry

COBIT

All industries worldwide

AS9100

Aviation, space, defense sectors

Nature

COBIT

Voluntary governance framework

AS9100

Certification quality standard

Testing

COBIT

Capability assessments and audits

AS9100

Stage 1/2 certification audits

Penalties

COBIT

No legal penalties

AS9100

Loss of certification and contracts

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about COBIT and AS9100

COBIT FAQ

AS9100 FAQ

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

The Tool Landscape for Reaching and Maintaining ISO 27701 Compliance

Discover the top tools for ISO 27701 compliance. Compare functionality, complexity, costs, and benefits to choose the best solution for your privacy program. Ac

CIS Controls v8.1 Metrics That Matter: KPIs, KRIs, and Dashboards for Board-Ready Cyber Reporting

Quantify CIS Controls v8.1 success with KPIs, KRIs & dashboards. Learn what to measure, calculations, and executive presentations linking security to business r

Proving CIS Controls v8.1 Works: A KPI & Evidence Framework for Board Reporting, Audits, and Continuous Assurance

Prove CIS Controls v8.1 effectiveness with KPI catalog, evidence checklist & reporting cadence. Ideal for board reports, audits & cyber-insurance. Measure outco

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

100+ Standards & Regulations

AI-Powered Insights

Collaborative Assessments

Actionable Recommendations

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

REACH vs SAMA CSF

REACH vs SAMA CSF: EU chemicals regulation meets Saudi financial cybersecurity framework. Uncover key differences, compliance strategies, risks & best practices for global ops. Dive in!

J-SOX vs CSA

Compare J-SOX vs CSA: Japan's principles-based ICFR for 3,800+ listed firms vs structured standards. Unlock key diffs, COSO alignment, IT focus & compliance strategies. Boost reliability now!

Six Sigma vs BREEAM

Compare Six Sigma vs BREEAM: Data-driven DMAIC excellence meets sustainable building certification. Explore belts, eco-ratings & key diffs for peak performance. Discover now!

COBIT

AS9100

Quick Verdict

COBIT

Key Features

AS9100

Key Features

Detailed Analysis

COBIT Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

AS9100 Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

Key Differences

Scope

Industry

Nature

Testing

Penalties

Frequently Asked Questions

COBIT FAQ

What is the primary objective of COBIT?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with COBIT?

Does COBIT require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for COBIT be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with COBIT?

An COBIT be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing COBIT?

AS9100 FAQ

What is the primary objective of AS9100?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with AS9100?

Does AS9100 require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for AS9100 be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with AS9100?

An AS9100 be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing AS9100?

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

The Tool Landscape for Reaching and Maintaining ISO 27701 Compliance

CIS Controls v8.1 Metrics That Matter: KPIs, KRIs, and Dashboards for Board-Ready Cyber Reporting

Proving CIS Controls v8.1 Works: A KPI & Evidence Framework for Board Reporting, Audits, and Continuous Assurance

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

REACH vs SAMA CSF

J-SOX vs CSA

Six Sigma vs BREEAM