What is the primary objective of **COBIT**?

**COBIT's primary objective is to create value from I&T, manage risk, and optimize resources by translating stakeholder needs into actionable governance and management objectives.** COBIT 2019 defines a core model of **40 governance and management objectives** across five domains (**EDM**, **APO**, **BAI**, **DSS**, **MEA**), supported by six governance system principles and seven components (processes, structures, policies, information, culture, skills, infrastructure). It uses a goals cascade linking **13 enterprise goals** and **13 alignment goals** to ensure end-to-end EGIT.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **COBIT**?

**No organization is legally required to comply with COBIT, as it is a voluntary framework maintained by ISACA, not a regulation.** Professionally, it is adopted by enterprises reliant on I&T for value creation, particularly in regulated sectors like finance and public services needing EGIT, audit alignment, or capability assessments. Boards, executives, CIOs, and GRC professionals use it to demonstrate governance distinct from management.

Does **COBIT** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**COBIT does not require external audit or third-party certification, as it is a framework, not a certifiable standard.** Organizations perform internal capability assessments using the **CMMI-based performance management model** (levels 0-5). **MEA04 Managed Assurance** supports self-assurance, with optional ISACA-aligned audits via credentials like **CISA** or **CGEIT** for evidence in regulatory contexts.

How often should an assessment for **COBIT** be performed?

**COBIT assessments should be performed periodically, aligned with the dynamic governance principle and CMMI-based capability levels (0-5).** ISACA recommends baseline assessments during design, then regular reviews (e.g., annually or after changes in **11 design factors** like strategy or risk profile) to measure progress via **CPM** and update the governance system workflow.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **COBIT**?

**Non-compliance with COBIT carries no direct legal penalties, as it is a voluntary framework.** Indirect consequences include increased regulatory risks (e.g., weak EGIT exposing SOX/GDPR gaps), audit findings, operational failures, or lost stakeholder value, as it fails to provide structured evidence for I&T risk management and performance monitoring.

Can **COBIT** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, COBIT 2019 explicitly supports mapping to other international frameworks via its governance framework principles emphasizing alignment.** Its **40 objectives** and components integrate with standards through published ISACA mappings, enabling interoperability while using COBIT as an umbrella for tailored EGIT.

What is the first step to begin implementing **COBIT**?

**The first step to implement COBIT is to evaluate stakeholder needs and enterprise context using the goals cascade and **11 design factors**.** This initiates the governance system design workflow (per COBIT 2019 Design Guide), scoping the **40 objectives**, baselining capabilities (level 0-5), and prioritizing via the toolkit for a best-fit system.

What is the primary objective of **ISO 19600**?

**ISO 19600:2014 provides guidelines for establishing, developing, implementing, evaluating, maintaining, and improving an effective compliance management system (CMS).** It uses a Plan-Do-Check-Act (PDCA) cycle and high-level structure, emphasizing principles of good governance, proportionality, transparency, and sustainability for all organization types and sizes.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **ISO 19600**?

**No organization is legally required to comply with ISO 19600, as it offers non-mandatory guidelines rather than requirements.** It applies voluntarily to any public, private, or non-profit entity seeking a scalable CMS proportionate to its size, structure, nature, and complexity, aiding integration with other management processes while preserving compliance function independence.

Does **ISO 19600** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**ISO 19600 does not require external audits or third-party certification, being a guidance standard without mandatory requirements.** Organizations may conduct internal audits per Clause 9.2 and use it for self-benchmarking, but certification is unavailable; ISO 37301 provides a certifiable successor.

How often should an assessment for **ISO 19600** be performed?

**ISO 19600 recommends ongoing monitoring, measurement, analysis, and evaluation of CMS performance per Clause 9.1, with planned internal audits at intervals based on risk.** Reassessments of compliance obligations and risks (Clauses 4.5–4.6) occur when changes or issues arise, supported by regular management reviews (Clause 9.3).

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **ISO 19600**?

**There are no direct consequences for non-compliance with ISO 19600, as it imposes no legal or enforceable requirements.** However, lacking an effective CMS may increase exposure to regulatory penalties, fines, reputational damage, or operational disruptions from unmet obligations, with courts sometimes considering CMS evidence in penalty determinations.

Can **ISO 19600** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, ISO 19600’s high-level structure and PDCA cycle enable mapping to other ISO management system standards.** Its risk-based approach aligns with shared architectures for quality, environmental, and risk management, facilitating integrated systems while maintaining compliance function independence (Clause 4.4).

What is the first step to begin implementing **ISO 19600**?

**The first step is determining the organization’s context, scope, and compliance obligations per Clauses 4.1–4.5.** This involves documenting internal/external issues, interested parties, CMS boundaries as documented information (Clause 4.3), and systematically identifying obligations like laws, contracts, and voluntary commitments.

COBIT vs ISO 19600

Standards Comparison

COBIT

Voluntary

2019

Global framework for enterprise IT governance and management

ISO 19600

Voluntary

2014

International guidelines for compliance management systems.

Quick Verdict

COBIT provides I&T governance frameworks for enterprises optimizing value and risk, while ISO 19600 offers CMS guidelines for systematic compliance management. Organizations adopt COBIT for IT alignment, ISO 19600 for obligation handling.

IT Governance

COBIT

COBIT 2019: Governance and Management Objectives

Cost

€€€€

Complexity

High

Implementation Time

12-18 months

Key Features

Tailored governance system via 11 design factors
40 objectives across 5 domains (EDM, APO, BAI, DSS, MEA)
CMMI-based performance management with 0-5 capability levels
Goals cascade linking stakeholder needs to IT metrics
Explicit separation of governance from management

Compliance Management

ISO 19600

ISO 19600:2014 Compliance management systems — Guidelines

Cost

€€€

Complexity

Medium

Implementation Time

12-18 months

Key Features

Principles of good governance for compliance function
PDCA cycle aligned with high-level structure
Risk-based compliance obligations identification
Proportionality to organization size and complexity
Integration with other management systems

Detailed Analysis

A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

COBIT Details

What It Is

COBIT 2019 is ISACA's comprehensive framework for enterprise governance and management of information and technology (EGIT). It provides a tailored, holistic approach to align I&T with business goals, manage risks, and optimize resources through a customizable governance system.

Key Components

40 governance and management objectives grouped into 5 domains: EDM (governance), APO, BAI, DSS, MEA (monitoring/assurance).
6 governance system principles and 7 components (processes, structures, culture, etc.).
11 design factors for tailoring; goals cascade; CMMI-based capability levels (0-5) for performance management. No formal certification, but aligns with ISACA credentials like CGEIT, CISA.

Why Organizations Use It

Delivers value from I&T, risk optimization, compliance alignment (SOX, GDPR).
Enables board oversight, audit readiness, digital transformation.
Builds stakeholder trust via traceable metrics and assurance.

Implementation Overview

Phased design workflow: assess maturity, prioritize via design factors, pilot objectives, measure capabilities. Suited for large/medium enterprises across industries; voluntary with training via ISACA partners.

ISO 19600 Details

What It Is

ISO 19600:2014, Compliance management systems — Guidelines, is an international guideline standard (withdrawn 2021, replaced by certifiable ISO 37301). It provides scalable guidance for establishing, implementing, evaluating, and improving a CMS using a risk-based PDCA (Plan-Do-Check-Act) approach applicable to all organization types and sizes.

Key Components

10 clauses mirroring ISO high-level structure: context, leadership, planning, support, operation, performance evaluation, improvement.
Core principles: good governance (e.g., compliance function independence, board access), proportionality, transparency, sustainability.
Focus on obligations identification, risk assessment; no fixed controls.
Non-certifiable; benchmarking tool.

Why Organizations Use It

Demonstrates proactive compliance to regulators/courts, reducing penalties.
Integrates with risk/quality systems for efficiency.
Builds ethical culture, stakeholder trust; strategic risk mitigation.

Implementation Overview

Phased: context analysis, policy design, controls, training, monitoring.
Proportional to size/complexity; all industries/geographies.
Voluntary; internal audits, no external certification.

Key Differences

Aspect	COBIT	ISO 19600
Scope	Enterprise I&T governance and management	Compliance management systems guidelines
Industry	All industries, enterprise-wide IT	All organizations, any sector
Nature	Voluntary governance framework	Non-certifiable guidelines
Testing	Capability assessments (0-5 levels)	Internal audits and reviews
Penalties	No legal penalties	No legal penalties

Scope

COBIT

Enterprise I&T governance and management

ISO 19600

Compliance management systems guidelines

Industry

COBIT

All industries, enterprise-wide IT

ISO 19600

All organizations, any sector

Nature

COBIT

Voluntary governance framework

ISO 19600

Non-certifiable guidelines

Testing

COBIT

Capability assessments (0-5 levels)

ISO 19600

Internal audits and reviews

Penalties

COBIT

No legal penalties

ISO 19600

No legal penalties

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about COBIT and ISO 19600

COBIT FAQ

ISO 19600 FAQ

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

CMMC Level 3 Implementation Guide: Integrating NIST SP 800-172 Enhanced Controls for APT Defense

Step-by-step CMMC Level 3 guide for DIB contractors. Implement 24 NIST SP 800-172 controls on Level 2. Prep for DIBCAC, C3PAO scoping & 180-day POA&Ms. Boost cy

ISO 27701 2025 Update: Navigating Standalone Certification Myths, Audit Realities, and a 90-Day PIMS Launch Plan

Debunk ISO 27701 2025 standalone certification myths vs ISO 27001. Get a 90-day PIMS launch roadmap, checklists & audit prep to certify faster amid global priva

You Guide on how to Start Implementing NIST CSF in Your Organization

Master NIST CSF implementation in your organization with this detailed guide. Learn core functions, key steps, best practices, and tips for cybersecurity succes

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

100+ Standards & Regulations

AI-Powered Insights

Collaborative Assessments

Actionable Recommendations

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

Six Sigma vs AS9110C

Discover Six Sigma vs AS9110C: data-driven DMAIC methodology meets aerospace QMS standards for aviation maintenance. Compare belts, risks & compliance to optimize quality, safety & efficiency. Explore now!

CE Marking vs BRC

Unravel CE Marking vs BRC: EU self-declaration for product safety vs BRCGS food audits & HACCP. Key differences, strategies, and compliance guide for market success.

FSSC 22000 vs CMMI

Compare FSSC 22000 vs CMMI: Food safety certification scheme meets process maturity model. Uncover key differences in requirements, audits, scopes & benefits for peak compliance. Dive in now!

COBIT

ISO 19600

Quick Verdict

COBIT

Key Features

ISO 19600

Key Features

Detailed Analysis

COBIT Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

ISO 19600 Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

Key Differences

Scope

Industry

Nature

Testing

Penalties

Frequently Asked Questions

COBIT FAQ

What is the primary objective of COBIT?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with COBIT?

Does COBIT require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for COBIT be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with COBIT?

Can COBIT be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing COBIT?

ISO 19600 FAQ

What is the primary objective of ISO 19600?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with ISO 19600?

Does ISO 19600 require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for ISO 19600 be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with ISO 19600?

Can ISO 19600 be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing ISO 19600?

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

CMMC Level 3 Implementation Guide: Integrating NIST SP 800-172 Enhanced Controls for APT Defense

ISO 27701 2025 Update: Navigating Standalone Certification Myths, Audit Realities, and a 90-Day PIMS Launch Plan

You Guide on how to Start Implementing NIST CSF in Your Organization

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

Six Sigma vs AS9110C

CE Marking vs BRC

FSSC 22000 vs CMMI