COPPA
U.S. regulation requiring parental consent for children's online data collection
ISO 27017
International standard for cloud-specific information security controls.
Quick Verdict
COPPA mandates parental consent for kids' data on US websites/apps, enforced by FTC fines. ISO 27017 provides voluntary cloud security guidance within ISO 27001 for providers/customers. Companies adopt COPPA for legal compliance, ISO 27017 for cloud assurance.
COPPA
Children's Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA)
Key Features
- Mandates verifiable parental consent before collecting data from children under 13
- Broadly defines personal information including persistent IDs, geolocation, multimedia files
- Requires privacy notices, data security, minimization, and parental access rights
- Applies to commercial websites, apps, IoT targeting or knowingly collecting kids data
- FTC-enforced with civil penalties up to $43,792 per violation
ISO 27017
ISO/IEC 27017:2015 Code of practice for cloud security controls
Key Features
- Clarifies shared responsibilities between CSPs and CSCs
- Adds 7 cloud-specific controls for multi-tenancy risks
- Provides guidance on 37 ISO 27002 controls for cloud
- Addresses VM hardening and segregation in virtual environments
- Enables customer monitoring of cloud service activities
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
COPPA Details
What It Is
Children's Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA) is a U.S. federal regulation enacted in 1998 and effective 2000, administered by the FTC. It safeguards children under 13 from unauthorized personal data collection by commercial online operators. Adopts a strict parental consent model with verifiable mechanisms.
Key Components
- Verifiable parental consent (VPC) via 11+ methods like credit cards or video calls.
- Expansive personal information definition: names, persistent IDs, geolocation, audio/video files.
- Requirements for privacy notices, data minimization, security, parental review/deletion/revocation rights.
- Safe harbor self-regulatory programs for compliance.
Why Organizations Use It
Ensures legal compliance amid FTC enforcement and penalties up to $43,792 per violation (e.g., YouTube's $170M fine). Builds parental trust, mitigates risks from edtech/AI/IoT, enables child-directed services. Enhances reputation and avoids litigation.
Implementation Overview
Operators assess child-directed content or actual knowledge, deploy age screens, VPC, policies. Applies globally to U.S.-targeted services, all commercial sizes/industries. Ongoing audits, no formal certification but safe harbors; involves training, third-party audits.
ISO 27017 Details
What It Is
ISO/IEC 27017:2015 is a code of practice extending ISO/IEC 27002 with cloud-specific guidance. It provides implementation advice for information security controls in cloud services, focusing on public, private, hybrid models across IaaS, PaaS, SaaS. Its risk-based approach adapts generic controls to cloud risks like multi-tenancy.
Key Components
- Guidance on 37 ISO 27002 controls plus 7 new cloud-specific CLD controls (e.g., shared responsibilities, VM segregation, asset removal).
- Structured around 14 domains mirroring 27002.
- Built on ISO 27001 ISMS; not standalone certification.
Why Organizations Use It
- Addresses shared CSP-CSC responsibilities, reducing cloud incidents.
- Meets procurement demands, regulatory alignment (GDPR/CCPA).
- Enhances risk management, builds customer trust.
- Competitive edge for CSPs via audit-ready cloud controls.
Implementation Overview
- Integrate into existing ISO 27001 via risk assessment, control mapping.
- Key steps: define responsibilities, configure segregation/monitoring, update SoA.
- Suits CSPs, CSCs of all sizes; global applicability.
- Audited as 27001 extension; joint audits 9-12 months.
Key Differences
| Aspect | COPPA | ISO 27017 |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Children under 13 online privacy | Cloud information security controls |
| Industry | Websites/apps targeting kids, global | Cloud providers/customers, all industries |
| Nature | Mandatory US federal law, FTC enforced | Voluntary ISO guidance, ISO 27001 extension |
| Testing | FTC investigations, no certification | ISO 27001 audits include controls |
| Penalties | $43k per violation, $170M fines | No legal penalties, certification loss |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about COPPA and ISO 27017
COPPA FAQ
ISO 27017 FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

The Regulatory Radar: How Data-Driven Compliance Tools Provide Strategic Foresight
Unlock strategic foresight with data-driven compliance tools. Act as your regulatory radar: real-time monitoring, automated insights, and 3x cost cuts. Anticipa

CIS Controls v8.1 for Cloud & SaaS: A Practical Safeguard Playbook for AWS/Azure/GCP and Microsoft 365
Turn CIS Controls v8.1 into a cloud-first playbook for AWS, Azure, GCP & Microsoft 365. Get actionable IaaS/PaaS/SaaS safeguards, automation patterns, evidence

The Panoramic View: How Integrated Compliance Monitoring Creates Unprecedented Organizational Visibility and Adaptability
Gain unprecedented organizational visibility with integrated compliance monitoring. Automate real-time alerts, ensure GDPR & SOC 2 adherence, reduce risks, and
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
ISO 22000 vs ISO 41001
ISO 22000 vs ISO 41001: Food safety FSMS meets facility mgmt excellence. Both HLS/PDCA-alignedācompare hazard controls, risks, ops for seamless integration & compliance. Choose smart!
NIST 800-171 vs ISO 17025
Unlock NIST 800-171 vs ISO 17025: CUI cybersecurity for contractors vs lab competence standards. Key differences, gaps, compliance strategiesāmaster both for peak security & accreditation!
HITRUST CSF vs ISO 27701
HITRUST CSF vs ISO 27701: Certifiable threat-adaptive framework (19 domains, maturity scoring) vs privacy PIMS on ISO 27001. Tailor compliance for regulated needsādiscover key diffs now!