Standards Comparison

    DORA

    Mandatory
    2023

    EU regulation for digital operational resilience in financial sector

    VS

    ISO 27032

    Voluntary
    2012

    International guidelines for Internet cybersecurity collaboration.

    Quick Verdict

    DORA mandates ICT resilience for EU finance firms via testing and reporting, while ISO 27032 offers voluntary Internet security guidelines for all organizations. Finance adopts DORA for compliance; others use 27032 to enhance global cyberspace collaboration and risk management.

    Digital Operational Resilience

    DORA

    Regulation (EU) 2022/2554 - Digital Operational Resilience Act

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    Medium
    Implementation Time
    18-24 months

    Key Features

    • Mandates comprehensive ICT risk management frameworks
    • Requires 4-hour initial major incident reporting
    • Enforces risk-based resilience testing and TLPT
    • Supervises critical third-party ICT providers directly
    • Harmonizes resilience rules across EU finance
    Cybersecurity

    ISO 27032

    ISO/IEC 27032:2023 Cybersecurity – Guidelines for Internet Security

    Cost
    €€€
    Complexity
    Medium
    Implementation Time
    12-18 months

    Key Features

    • Multi-stakeholder collaboration for cyberspace security
    • Guidelines for Internet-specific risk assessment
    • Annex A mapping to ISO 27002 controls
    • Emphasis on incident detection and response
    • Integration with ISO 27001 ISMS frameworks

    Detailed Analysis

    A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

    DORA Details

    What It Is

    DORA, formally Regulation (EU) 2022/2554, is an EU-wide regulation mandating digital operational resilience for the financial sector against ICT disruptions like cyberattacks and third-party failures. It applies to 20 financial entity types and critical ICT third-party providers (CTPPs), using a risk-based, proportional approach to harmonize rules across 27 member states.

    Key Components

    Core pillars include ICT risk management frameworks with vulnerability assessments and continuity plans; incident reporting requiring 4-hour initial notifications for major events; resilience testing via annual scans and triennial threat-led penetration testing (TLPT); and third-party oversight with due diligence, monitoring, and ESAs supervision of CTPPs. No formal certification, but compliance enforced via penalties up to 2% global turnover.

    Why Organizations Use It

    Essential for legal compliance ahead of January 2025 deadline, DORA mitigates systemic risks amid 74% ransomware prevalence, enhances cyber defenses, fosters stakeholder trust, and drives €10-15B in resilience investments while addressing third-party vulnerabilities exposed by events like CrowdStrike outage.

    Implementation Overview

    Involves gap analyses, framework development, tool deployment for reporting/testing, and vendor contract updates. Targets ~22,000 EU entities proportionally by size/risk; requires ongoing authority reporting and remediation, with Batch 1/2 technical standards guiding rollout.

    ISO 27032 Details

    What It Is

    ISO/IEC 27032:2023, titled Cybersecurity – Guidelines for Internet Security, is an international guidance standard (not certifiable) providing high-level recommendations for managing Internet security risks in cyberspace. It adopts a risk-based, collaborative approach, linking information security, network security, Internet security, and critical infrastructure protection.

    Key Components

    • Multi-stakeholder roles and collaboration frameworks.
    • Annex A mapping Internet threats to ISO/IEC 27002 controls (93 total).
    • Core principles: risk assessment, incident management, awareness, technical controls.
    • Built on PDCA cycle; non-certifiable, integrates with ISO 27001 ISMS.

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Reduces ecosystem risks, improves resilience and incident response.
    • Aligns with regulations like NIS2, GDPR; enhances trust and market access.
    • Strategic benefits: efficiency, competitive edge, insurance savings.

    Implementation Overview

    • Phased: gap analysis, risk assessment, controls deployment, monitoring.
    • Applies to all sizes, especially online/networked ops; no certification, but audits recommended. (178 words)

    Key Differences

    Scope

    DORA
    Digital operational resilience in finance
    ISO 27032
    Guidelines for Internet/cyberspace security

    Industry

    DORA
    EU financial entities and CTPPs
    ISO 27032
    All organizations with online presence

    Nature

    DORA
    Mandatory EU regulation
    ISO 27032
    Voluntary international guidelines

    Testing

    DORA
    Annual basic, triennial TLPT
    ISO 27032
    Risk-based assessments, no mandates

    Penalties

    DORA
    Up to 2% global turnover fines
    ISO 27032
    No legal penalties

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Common questions about DORA and ISO 27032

    DORA FAQ

    ISO 27032 FAQ

    You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

    Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

    Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

    Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

    100+ Standards & Regulations
    AI-Powered Insights
    Collaborative Assessments
    Actionable Recommendations

    Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages