HITRUST CSF vs MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)
HITRUST CSF
Certifiable framework harmonizing 60+ security standards
MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)
China's regulation for graded cybersecurity protection of networks
Quick Verdict
HITRUST CSF offers voluntary, certifiable assurance harmonizing 60+ standards for global healthcare and beyond, while MLPS 2.0 mandates graded protection for all China networks with PSB enforcement. Companies adopt HITRUST for market trust; MLPS to avoid fines and suspensions.
HITRUST CSF
HITRUST Common Security Framework
Key Features
- Harmonizes 60+ standards into certifiable framework
- Risk-based tailoring via structured factors
- Five-level maturity model (Policy-Managed)
- MyCSF platform enables inheritance and scoping
- e1/i1/r2 tiered certification pathways
MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)
Multi-Level Protection Scheme 2.0
Key Features
- Five impact-based protection levels (1-5)
- Mandatory PSB filing and approval for Level 2+
- Third-party audits scoring 75/100 minimum
- Extended controls for cloud, IoT, ICS
- Governance, personnel, supply chain requirements
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
HITRUST CSF Details
What It Is
HITRUST Common Security Framework (CSF) is a certifiable, risk-based control framework harmonizing over 60 standards like HIPAA, NIST, ISO 27001, PCI DSS, and GDPR. It provides threat-adaptive, prescriptive requirements for security and privacy in regulated sectors.
Key Components
- 19 assessment domains and hierarchical taxonomy (14 categories, 49 objectives, ~156 specifications).
- Five-level maturity model: Policy, Procedure, Implemented, Measured, Managed.
- Tiered assessments: e1 (44 controls), i1 (182 requirements), r2 (tailored).
- MyCSF platform for scoping, inheritance, and certification.
Why Organizations Use It
- Demonstrates multi-framework compliance via 'assess once, report many'.
- Builds stakeholder trust with centralized validation.
- Reduces third-party risk, audit fatigue, insurance costs.
- Enables market differentiation in healthcare, finance.
Implementation Overview
Multi-phase: scoping, readiness, remediation, validated assessment by external assessors, continuous monitoring. Suited for regulated industries; requires policies, evidence, ~12-18 months for certification.
MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme) Details
What It Is
MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme) is China's mandatory cybersecurity regulation under the 2016 Cybersecurity Law, requiring network operators to classify systems into five protection levels based on compromise impact to national security and public interests. It uses an impact-based, graded approach with technical, governance, and physical controls.
Key Components
- Core domains: physical security, network protection, data security, access control, monitoring, governance.
- Standards like GB/T 22239-2019, GB/T 25070-2019 define baselines and extensions for cloud, IoT, ICS.
- Compliance via self-classification, third-party audits (75/100 score), PSB approval for Level 2+.
Why Organizations Use It
- Legal mandate enforced by Public Security Bureaus with fines, inspections.
- Enhances resilience, supports market access in China.
- Builds trust with regulators, reduces breach risks.
Implementation Overview
- Phased: scoping, classification, gap analysis, remediation, audits, ongoing re-evaluations.
- Applies to all China-based network operators; higher costs for Level 3+.
- Mandatory external reviews, periodic reassessments (annual for Level 3).
Key Differences
| Aspect | HITRUST CSF | MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme) |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | 19 domains, 60+ harmonized frameworks, maturity-scored controls | 5 protection levels, technical/management/physical controls for networks |
| Industry | Healthcare primary, industry-agnostic, global adoption | All network operators in China, critical infrastructure focus |
| Nature | Voluntary certifiable framework with centralized assurance | Mandatory legal regime enforced by public security bureaus |
| Testing | Authorized assessors, MyCSF platform, annual/biennial validated assessments | Licensed third-party audits, PSB approval, annual re-evaluations Level 3+ |
| Penalties | Loss of certification, no legal penalties | Fines, operational suspension, license revocation |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about HITRUST CSF and MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)
HITRUST CSF FAQ
MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme) FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...
CMMC Cost Calculator: Realistic Budgets for Levels 1-3, C3PAO Fees, and ROI for Small DIB Suppliers
Calculate realistic CMMC costs for Levels 1-3: self-assessments, C3PAO fees, tooling, remediation & ROI. Interactive tool for small DIB suppliers. Get benchmark
Thailand PDPA Enforcement Trends 2025: Analyzing 1,048 Complaints, Breach Volumes, and Hidden Lessons for Proactive Compliance
Decode PDPC Thailand's 1,048 complaints & 610 breaches. Uncover consent/security violations, project 2025 enforcement. Risk heatmap, self-assessment & playbook
DORA Third-Party Risk Management: A Consultant’s Guide to Mapping Critical ICT Service Providers in 2026
Navigate DORA's complex third-party risk pillar. Step-by-step consultant guide to identify critical ICT providers, remediate Article 30 contracts, and build the
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Explore More Comparisons
See how HITRUST CSF and MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme) compare against other standards