GRADUM
    FeaturesMaturity ModelsFor CreatorsPricingBlogCompareSupport
    DashboardSign Up Free
    Blog/Compare/TISAX vs MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)
    Standards Comparison

    TISAX vs MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)

    TISAX

    Mandatory
    2017

    Automotive standard for information security assessments and exchange

    VS

    MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)

    Mandatory
    2019

    China's mandatory graded cybersecurity protection framework.

    Quick Verdict

    TISAX provides voluntary automotive supply chain security certification via ENX audits, while MLPS 2.0 mandates graded network protection in China enforced by PSBs. Companies adopt TISAX for OEM contracts; MLPS for legal compliance and operations.

    Cybersecurity

    TISAX

    Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange (TISAX)

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    6-12 months

    Key Features

    • Shareable labels via ENX Portal eliminate duplicate audits
    • Automotive-specific prototype protection for parts and vehicles
    • Three risk-based assessment levels AL1 to AL3
    • VDA ISA catalog extends ISO 27001 controls
    • Three-year validity with maturity-based evaluations
    Cybersecurity

    MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)

    Multi-Level Protection Scheme 2.0 (MLPS 2.0)

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    Medium
    Implementation Time
    12-18 months

    Key Features

    • Five-level impact-based system classification
    • Mandatory PSB registration and approval (Level 2+)
    • Graded technical controls for cloud, IoT, ICS
    • Third-party audits with 75/100 pass score
    • Ongoing governance and incident reporting obligations

    Detailed Analysis

    A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

    TISAX Details

    What It Is

    TISAX (Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange) is a certification framework developed by the ENX Association for the automotive industry, based on the VDA ISA catalog (version 5.0.4/6.0). It standardizes assessments to protect sensitive data like IP, prototypes, and personal information across global supply chains. Employs a risk-based approach with CIA triad focus and three maturity levels.

    Key Components

    • Seven control groups: policy, organization, personnel, physical security, access, cryptography, operations (70+ items).
    • Built on ISO 27001 with automotive extensions like prototype protection.
    • Assessment levels: AL1 (self-assessment), AL2 (remote check), AL3 (on-site audit).
    • Shareable TISAX labels valid 3 years via ENX Portal.

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Contractual mandates from OEMs (e.g., BMW, VW) prevent revenue loss.
    • Reduces duplicate audits by 70-90%, enables market access.
    • Mitigates risks, enhances resilience, builds supplier trust.
    • Delivers ROI through efficiency and IP protection.

    Implementation Overview

    • Phased: scoping/gap analysis, remediation/tabletops, audit, sustainment (6-18 months).
    • Targets OEMs, Tier 1/2 suppliers, service providers; scalable for SMEs/multinationals.
    • Accredited providers (e.g., DQS, TÜV) conduct AL2/AL3 audits.

    MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme) Details

    What It Is

    MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme 2.0) is China's legally mandated cybersecurity framework under the 2017 Cybersecurity Law (Article 21). It requires network operators to classify systems into five protection levels based on potential impact to national security, social order, and public interests, implementing graded technical, organizational, and governance controls.

    Key Components

    • Core domains: physical security, network protection, data security, access control, monitoring, governance.
    • Standards: GB/T 22239-2019 (basics), GB/T 25070-2019 (technical), GB/T 28448-2019 (evaluation).
    • Common controls for all levels; extended for cloud, IoT, big data, ICS.
    • Compliance via self-classification, third-party audits (Level 2+), PSB approval.

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Mandatory for China operations; non-compliance risks fines, suspensions.
    • Enhances resilience, supports market access, aligns with data laws.
    • Builds regulator trust, reduces breach risks.

    Implementation Overview

    • Phased: scoping, classification, gap analysis, remediation, audits, ongoing monitoring.
    • Applies to all network operators in China; higher costs for Level 3+.
    • Requires local PSB filing, periodic re-evaluations.

    Key Differences

    AspectTISAXMLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)
    ScopeAutomotive info security, prototypes, CIA triadAll networks, graded by national impact, tech-specific
    IndustryAutomotive supply chain, global participantsAll sectors in China, mandatory for operators
    NatureVoluntary industry certification, ENX-managedMandatory regulation, PSB-enforced law
    TestingAL1-3 audits by accredited providers, 3-year validityLevel 2+ third-party audits, PSB approval, periodic re-evals
    PenaltiesContract loss, no legal finesFines, suspensions, operational shutdowns

    Scope

    TISAX
    Automotive info security, prototypes, CIA triad
    MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)
    All networks, graded by national impact, tech-specific

    Industry

    TISAX
    Automotive supply chain, global participants
    MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)
    All sectors in China, mandatory for operators

    Nature

    TISAX
    Voluntary industry certification, ENX-managed
    MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)
    Mandatory regulation, PSB-enforced law

    Testing

    TISAX
    AL1-3 audits by accredited providers, 3-year validity
    MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)
    Level 2+ third-party audits, PSB approval, periodic re-evals

    Penalties

    TISAX
    Contract loss, no legal fines
    MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)
    Fines, suspensions, operational shutdowns

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Common questions about TISAX and MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)

    TISAX FAQ

    MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme) FAQ

    You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

    CIS Controls v8.1 for Cloud & Kubernetes: A Practical Implementation Playbook (AWS/Azure/GCP + IaC)

    CIS Controls v8.1 for Cloud & Kubernetes: A Practical Implementation Playbook (AWS/Azure/GCP + IaC)

    Translate CIS Controls v8.1 to cloud-native: Kubernetes patterns for IAM, logging, vuln mgmt, hardening on AWS, Azure, GCP + IaC. Practical playbook for teams.

    The NIS2 "FTE Trap": Why 5 Analysts for 24/7 Security is Actually 8 (and Why the Board Needs to Know)

    The NIS2 "FTE Trap": Why 5 Analysts for 24/7 Security is Actually 8 (and Why the Board Needs to Know)

    Exposed: NIS2 FTE Trap math shows 5 analysts fail 24/7 coverage due to sickness, training, leave & 2026 churn. Line-by-line breakdown for compliance. Alert your

    NIST CSF 2.0 Govern Function Deep Dive: Building Executive Cybersecurity Governance from Scratch

    NIST CSF 2.0 Govern Function Deep Dive: Building Executive Cybersecurity Governance from Scratch

    Step-by-step blueprint for NIST CSF 2.0 Govern function: templates, RACI matrices, metrics to elevate cybersecurity governance to boardroom level. Reduce breach

    Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

    Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

    Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

    100+ Standards & Regulations
    AI-Powered Insights
    Collaborative Assessments
    Actionable Recommendations

    Explore More Comparisons

    See how TISAX and MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme) compare against other standards

    Other TISAX Comparisons

    • ITIL vs TISAX
    • GDPR vs TISAX
    • SAFe vs TISAX
    • ISO 27001 vs TISAX
    • PIPL vs TISAX

    Other MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme) Comparisons

    • DORA vs MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)
    • PCI DSS vs MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)
    • CSL (Cyber Security Law of China) vs MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)
    • MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme) vs ISO 27018
    • NIS2 vs MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)
    GRADUM

    Transform your assessment process with collaborative, AI-powered maturity evaluations that deliver actionable insights.

    Navigation

    FeaturesMaturity ModelsFor CreatorsPricing

    Legal

    Terms and ConditionsPrivacy PolicyImprintCopyright PolicyCookie Policy

    © 2026 Gradum. All Rights Reserved