What is the primary objective of **ISO 14064**?

**ISO 14064 provides requirements and guidance for quantifying, reporting, and verifying greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and removals.** The standard family—**ISO 14064-1:2018** for organizational inventories, **ISO 14064-2:2019** for project-level reductions/removals, and **ISO 14064-3:2019** for validation/verification—ensures GHG statements are credible, comparable, and auditable. It enforces five principles: **relevance**, **completeness**, **consistency**, **transparency**, and **accuracy**, supporting regulatory reporting, investor disclosures, and carbon markets.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **ISO 14064**?

**No organization is universally legally required to comply with ISO 14064, as it is a voluntary international standard.** However, organizations, project developers, governments, NGOs, and universities professionally adopt it for credible GHG inventories, especially in emissions trading, green finance, or stakeholder demands like CDP. Verification bodies must follow **ISO 14064-3** for assurance engagements, often under **ISO 14065:2020** accreditation.

Does **ISO 14064** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**ISO 14064 does not require external audit or third-party certification.** Parts 1 and 2 provide self-implemented requirements for inventories and projects, with verification under **ISO 14064-3** optional but recommended for credibility. Organizations produce verified statements via competent, impartial verifiers at limited or reasonable assurance levels, elevating claims for markets and regulators.

How often should an assessment for **ISO 14064** be performed?

**ISO 14064 requires annual GHG inventory assessments aligned with the organization's reporting period.** Organizational boundaries, **Scopes 1-3** emissions, and base-year adjustments must be reassessed yearly for consistency, with recalculations for structural changes like acquisitions. Project monitoring under **Part 2** follows defined plans, typically continuous or periodic.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **ISO 14064**?

**Non-compliance with ISO 14064 carries no direct penalties, as it is voluntary.** Indirect risks include invalidated GHG claims, rejected participation in emissions trading or green finance, reputational damage from greenwashing accusations, and regulatory scrutiny in disclosure regimes expecting verifiable data. Poor inventories fail **ISO 14064-3** assurance, eroding stakeholder trust.

Can **ISO 14064** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, ISO 14064 aligns closely with the GHG Protocol Corporate Standard's principles and Scope categories.** Its five principles (**relevance, completeness, consistency, transparency, accuracy**) mirror GHG Protocol requirements, enabling interoperable inventories. **Part 1** supports Scope 1-3 classification; **Part 2** aids project baselines/additionality; **Part 3** complements assurance standards, facilitating multi-framework reporting.

What is the first step to begin implementing **ISO 14064**?

**The first step is defining organizational and operational boundaries per ISO 14064-1.** Select consolidation approach (**equity share** or **control**—financial/operational), identify emission sources/sinks across **Scopes 1-3**, and document relevance to decision-making needs. This governance decision ensures completeness and sets the foundation for data collection, quantification, and reporting.

What is the primary objective of **ISO 56002**?

**ISO 56002 provides guidance for establishing, implementing, maintaining, and continually improving an Innovation Management System (IMS).** The standard structures the IMS around the PDCA cycle across Clauses 4–10: context of the organization, leadership, planning, support, operation, performance evaluation, and improvement. It emphasizes eight principles including value realization, future-focused leadership, strategic direction, and managing uncertainty, enabling organizations to systematically convert opportunities into value without prescribing specific tools or methods.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **ISO 56002**?

**No organization is legally required to comply with ISO 56002, as it is a voluntary guidance standard.** It applies generically to all organizations regardless of size, sector, or type—including SMEs, established firms, and startups—seeking to manage innovation as a strategic capability. Professionals such as C-suite executives, Chief Innovation Officers, R&D heads, and quality managers adopt it to align innovation with governance, demonstrate capability to stakeholders, or integrate with existing management systems.

Does **ISO 56002** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**ISO 56002 does not require external audits or third-party certification, being a guidance standard without normative requirements.** Organizations may conduct internal audits (Clause 9.2) and management reviews (Clause 9.3) for self-conformity. Optional third-party conformity assessments are available via some certification bodies using ISO 56004 assessment guidance, but formal certification aligns more with ISO 56001 requirements.

How often should an assessment for **ISO 56002** be performed?

**ISO 56002 requires regular performance evaluations including monitoring, measurement, internal audits, and management reviews, with frequency determined by organizational context.** Clause 9 mandates periodic internal audits (typically annually or semi-annually) and management reviews at planned intervals to assess IMS effectiveness, feeding into Clause 10 continual improvement. Maturity diagnostics like the Potential Innovation Index (PII) are recommended initially and periodically for gap analysis.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **ISO 56002**?

**Non-compliance with ISO 56002 carries no legal penalties, as it imposes no mandatory requirements.** Business risks include resource waste on unmanaged "zombie projects," strategic obsolescence, high project failure rates (70-80%), IP leakage, and lost stakeholder confidence. Effective IMS adoption mitigates these by improving portfolio governance, decision traceability, and value realization.

Can **ISO 56002** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, ISO 56002 maps seamlessly to other ISO management system standards via its High-Level Structure (HLS) and PDCA alignment.** Clauses 4–10 integrate with frameworks like ISO 9001 (quality) and ISO 27001 (security), sharing leadership reviews, audits, and documented information. It complements ISO 56000 family standards (e.g., ISO 56003 for partnerships, ISO 56004 for assessments) for cohesive innovation governance.

What is the first step to begin implementing **ISO 56002**?

**The first step is conducting a readiness diagnostic and gap analysis against ISO 56002 clauses using tools like the Potential Innovation Index (PII) or InnoSurvey.** This establishes baseline maturity across leadership, strategy, processes, and resources (Clauses 4–7), informing a prioritized roadmap: align leadership (Clause 5), define policy and scope (Clauses 4–6), then pilot on a representative portfolio.

ISO 14064 vs ISO 56002

Standards Comparison

ISO 14064

Voluntary

2018

International standards for GHG quantification, reporting, verification

ISO 56002

Voluntary

2019

International guidance standard for innovation management systems.

Quick Verdict

ISO 14064 provides GHG measurement, reporting, and assurance frameworks for climate compliance, while ISO 56002 offers guidance for building systematic innovation capabilities. Companies adopt 14064 for credible emissions data and regulatory readiness; 56002 for governed, repeatable innovation value creation.

Greenhouse Gas Accounting

ISO 14064

ISO 14064 Greenhouse gases quantification standards

Cost

€€€

Complexity

High

Implementation Time

6-12 months

Key Features

Modular three-part structure for inventories, projects, verification
Five core principles: relevance, completeness, consistency, transparency, accuracy
Defines Scope 1-3 boundaries and consolidation approaches
Risk-based validation/verification with assurance levels
Aligns with GHG Protocol for global interoperability

Innovation Management

ISO 56002

ISO 56002:2019 Innovation management system guidance

Cost

€€€

Complexity

Medium

Implementation Time

12-18 months

Key Features

PDCA cycle for continual IMS improvement
Leadership accountability and future-focused governance
Portfolio balancing across risk and horizons
Balanced KPIs for input, throughput, outcomes
Integration with existing ISO management systems

Detailed Analysis

A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

ISO 14064 Details

What It Is

ISO 14064 is an international standard family (Parts 1:2018, 2:2019, 3:2019) for greenhouse gas (GHG) quantification, reporting, and verification. It provides a modular framework for organizations and projects, emphasizing principle-based approaches like relevance and transparency.

Key Components

**Three partsOrganizational inventories (Part 1), project reductions/removals (Part 2), validation/verification (Part 3).
**Five principlesRelevance, completeness, consistency, transparency, accuracy.
Scopes 1-3 emissions classification and boundary consolidation (equity/operational control).
Voluntary third-party assurance with limited/reasonable levels.

Why Organizations Use It

Drives regulatory compliance (e.g., CSRD, SB-253), investor trust, carbon market access, and decarbonization insights. Mitigates greenwashing risks, enables benchmarking, and supports Scope 3 supply-chain management for competitive advantage.

Implementation Overview

Phased approach: governance, boundary setting, data collection, verification. Applies to all sizes/industries globally; 6-12 months typical, with software/tools and verifier engagement for audit-ready inventories. (178 words)

ISO 56002 Details

What It Is

ISO 56002:2019 is an international guidance standard for establishing, implementing, maintaining, and improving an Innovation Management System (IMS). It provides a generic, non-prescriptive framework applicable to all organizations, focusing on transforming innovation into a strategic capability via the PDCA cycle.

Key Components

Seven core clauses: context, leadership, planning, support, operation, performance evaluation, improvement.
Eight principles: value realization, future-focused leadership, strategic direction, culture, insights exploitation, uncertainty management, adaptability, systems thinking.
Built on ISO High-Level Structure for integration; no fixed controls, emphasizes tailoring.
Guidance only; pairs with certifiable ISO 56001.

Why Organizations Use It

Drives measurable innovation outcomes and ROI.
Enhances leadership commitment, portfolio governance, risk management.
Builds stakeholder confidence, competitiveness; voluntary but strategic for SMEs/enterprises.

Implementation Overview

Phased: diagnosis, design, pilot, scale, sustain (12-18 months typical).
Involves maturity assessments (e.g., PII), policy development, tooling, audits.
Universal applicability; optional conformity assessments.

Key Differences

Aspect	ISO 14064	ISO 56002
Scope	GHG quantification, reporting, verification	Innovation management system guidance
Industry	All sectors worldwide, any organization	All sectors worldwide, any organization
Nature	Modular standards family, voluntary	Guidance standard, voluntary non-certifiable
Testing	Third-party validation/verification optional	Internal audits, management reviews required
Penalties	No direct penalties, market credibility loss	No penalties, internal performance impacts

Scope

ISO 14064

GHG quantification, reporting, verification

ISO 56002

Innovation management system guidance

Industry

ISO 14064

All sectors worldwide, any organization

ISO 56002

All sectors worldwide, any organization

Nature

ISO 14064

Modular standards family, voluntary

ISO 56002

Guidance standard, voluntary non-certifiable

Testing

ISO 14064

Third-party validation/verification optional

ISO 56002

Internal audits, management reviews required

Penalties

ISO 14064

No direct penalties, market credibility loss

ISO 56002

No penalties, internal performance impacts

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about ISO 14064 and ISO 56002

ISO 14064 FAQ

ISO 56002 FAQ

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

The Reasons Why NIS2 is Fundamental for Cyber Resilience in Europe

Uncover why NIS2 transcends compliance burdens, delivering real cyber resilience value through enforced measurements and activities. Explore insights via our pa

Top 5 Reasons HITRUST CSF's MyCSF Platform Crushes Evidence Overload for R2 Assessments in Hybrid Cloud Environments

Explore top 5 advantages of HITRUST MyCSF for 1,400+ R2 controls in hybrid clouds. Slash docs by 30%, dodge under-scoping, achieve continuous compliance for hea

NIST CSF 2.0 Deep Dive: Mastering the Updated Framework Core Functions

Unpack NIST CSF 2.0's enhanced Core Functions: Govern, Identify, Protect, Detect, Respond, Recover. Get SME playbooks, governance shifts & strategies for cyber

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

100+ Standards & Regulations

AI-Powered Insights

Collaborative Assessments

Actionable Recommendations

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

GDPR vs UAE PDPL

GDPR vs UAE PDPL: EU gold standard meets UAE's bold privacy law. Uncover similarities in rights, principles & fines; key diffs in scope, free zones. Master dual compliance now!

NIS2 vs ISO 45001

Discover NIS2 vs ISO 45001: Contrast EU cybersecurity's strict reporting, fines up to 2% turnover with OH&S risk mgmt, leadership. Ensure compliance mastery now!

Australian Privacy Act vs ISO 27701

Compare Australian Privacy Act vs ISO 27701: Principles-based APPs & NDB meet certifiable PIMS. Master compliance, risks & cross-border flows. Elevate your strategy now!

ISO 14064

ISO 56002

Quick Verdict

ISO 14064

Key Features

ISO 56002

Key Features

Detailed Analysis

ISO 14064 Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

ISO 56002 Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

Key Differences

Scope

Industry

Nature

Testing

Penalties

Frequently Asked Questions

ISO 14064 FAQ

What is the primary objective of ISO 14064?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with ISO 14064?

Does ISO 14064 require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for ISO 14064 be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with ISO 14064?

Can ISO 14064 be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing ISO 14064?

ISO 56002 FAQ

What is the primary objective of ISO 56002?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with ISO 56002?

Does ISO 56002 require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for ISO 56002 be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with ISO 56002?

Can ISO 56002 be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing ISO 56002?

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

The Reasons Why NIS2 is Fundamental for Cyber Resilience in Europe

Top 5 Reasons HITRUST CSF's MyCSF Platform Crushes Evidence Overload for R2 Assessments in Hybrid Cloud Environments

NIST CSF 2.0 Deep Dive: Mastering the Updated Framework Core Functions

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

GDPR vs UAE PDPL

NIS2 vs ISO 45001

Australian Privacy Act vs ISO 27701