Standards Comparison

    ISO 26000

    Voluntary
    2010

    International guidance standard for social responsibility

    VS

    ISO 27018

    Voluntary
    2019

    International code of practice for PII protection in public clouds.

    Quick Verdict

    ISO 26000 offers voluntary guidance on broad social responsibility for all organizations, while ISO 27018 provides certifiable controls for PII protection in public clouds. Companies adopt ISO 26000 for ethical governance and ISO 27018 for cloud privacy compliance and trust.

    Social Responsibility

    ISO 26000

    ISO 26000:2010 Guidance on social responsibility

    Cost
    €€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    12-18 months

    Key Features

    • Non-certifiable guidance explicitly rejecting certification
    • Seven principles underpinning all SR decisions
    • Seven interconnected core subjects for holistic coverage
    • Stakeholder engagement for issue prioritization
    • Multi-stakeholder consensus from 500+ global experts
    Cloud Privacy

    ISO 27018

    ISO/IEC 27018 Code of practice for cloud PII protection

    Cost
    €€€
    Complexity
    Medium
    Implementation Time
    6-12 months

    Key Features

    • Privacy controls for public cloud PII processors
    • Subprocessor transparency and location disclosure
    • Breach notification to customers without delay
    • Support for data subject rights fulfillment
    • Prohibits PII use for marketing without consent

    Detailed Analysis

    A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

    ISO 26000 Details

    What It Is

    ISO 26000:2010 is a non-certifiable international guidance standard providing a framework for social responsibility (SR). Its primary purpose is to help organizations integrate SR into governance, strategy, and operations across all sectors, sizes, and locations. It uses a principles-based, holistic approach emphasizing context, stakeholder engagement, and life-cycle impacts.

    Key Components

    • Seven core principles: accountability, transparency, ethical behavior, respect for stakeholder interests, rule of law, international norms, human rights.
    • Seven core subjects: organizational governance, human rights, labor practices, environment, fair operating practices, consumer issues, community involvement.
    • Built on multi-stakeholder consensus from 500+ experts across 80 countries; no requirements, thus no certification model—focuses on self-assessment and transparent reporting.

    Why Organizations Use It

    Enhances sustainability commitment, risk management, and stakeholder trust without certification burdens. Aligns with SDGs, OECD, GRI; reduces reputational/legal risks; supports ESG reporting and competitive differentiation via credible SR practices.

    Implementation Overview

    Phased approach: materiality assessment, stakeholder engagement, policy integration, training, supplier due diligence. Applicable universally; no audits required, but integrate with ISO 14001/45001; ongoing PDCA for continuous improvement.

    ISO 27018 Details

    What It Is

    ISO/IEC 27018:2025 is a code of practice extending ISO 27001 and ISO 27002 for protecting personally identifiable information (PII) in public clouds where providers act as PII processors. Its primary scope targets cloud-specific privacy risks like multi-tenancy and cross-border data flows, using a risk-based, control-oriented approach.

    Key Components

    • Privacy-specific controls (~25-30) mapped to ISO 27001 Annex A themes: organizational, people, physical, technological.
    • Core principles: consent, purpose limitation, data minimization, transparency, accountability.
    • Integrated with ISO 27001 ISMS; assessed during certification audits, not standalone.

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Builds customer trust, accelerates procurement via Statement of Applicability.
    • Aligns with GDPR Article 28, HIPAA; aids regulatory compliance.
    • Mitigates privacy risks, enhances cyber insurance terms.
    • Differentiates CSPs in competitive markets.

    Implementation Overview

    • Conduct gap analysis against existing ISMS.
    • Integrate controls, update policies/contracts, train staff.
    • Applicable to CSPs of all sizes; requires ISO 27001 prerequisite.
    • Third-party audits: stage 1/2, annual surveillance, 3-year recertification. (178 words)

    Key Differences

    Scope

    ISO 26000
    Social responsibility across 7 core subjects
    ISO 27018
    PII protection in public cloud services

    Industry

    ISO 26000
    All organizations, all sectors globally
    ISO 27018
    Cloud service providers worldwide

    Nature

    ISO 26000
    Non-certifiable guidance standard
    ISO 27018
    Certifiable code of practice extension

    Testing

    ISO 26000
    Self-assessment, stakeholder reporting
    ISO 27018
    ISO 27001 audits with added controls

    Penalties

    ISO 26000
    No penalties, reputational risks only
    ISO 27018
    Loss of certification, no legal fines

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Common questions about ISO 26000 and ISO 27018

    ISO 26000 FAQ

    ISO 27018 FAQ

    You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

    Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

    Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

    Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

    100+ Standards & Regulations
    AI-Powered Insights
    Collaborative Assessments
    Actionable Recommendations

    Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages