What is the primary objective of ISO 27018?

ISO 27018 provides a code of practice for protecting personally identifiable information (PII) in public clouds acting as PII processors. It extends ISO 27001 and ISO 27002 with ~25–30 privacy-specific controls addressing cloud risks like multi-tenancy, subprocessor transparency, consent, purpose limitation, data minimization, breach notification, and restrictions on secondary PII use (e.g., no marketing without consent). The 2019 edition aligns with ISO 27002:2013, emphasizing processor obligations across the PII lifecycle.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with ISO 27018?

ISO 27018 applies to public cloud service providers (CSPs) acting as PII processors, not controllers. Targeted at hyperscalers, regional platforms, and sector-specific clouds (e.g., health, finance), it is a professional best practice for demonstrating privacy stewardship amid regulatory pressures like GDPR Article 28. Controllers use it for vendor due diligence; no universal legal mandate exists, but it is expected for procurement in regulated sectors.

Does ISO 27018 require an external audit or third-party certification?

ISO 27018 does not offer standalone certification but is assessed via external audits within an ISO 27001 ISMS. Accredited bodies (under ISO/IEC 17021 and 27006) evaluate its controls during ISO 27001 Stage 1/2 audits, including the Statement of Applicability. Certificates reference both standards, valid for 3 years with annual surveillance.

How often should an assessment for ISO 27018 be performed?

ISO 27018 assessments occur through annual surveillance audits and full recertification every 3 years as part of ISO 27001 certification. Ongoing internal reviews via risk assessments and continual improvement plans ensure control effectiveness amid cloud changes like new services or subprocessors.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with ISO 27018?

Non-compliance with ISO 27018 risks loss of market trust, procurement delays, cyber insurance issues, and failure to meet processor obligations under laws like GDPR. As a code of practice, it incurs no direct fines, but weak PII controls can lead to regulatory penalties, contract breaches, or reputational damage from incidents.

Can ISO 27018 be mapped to other international frameworks?

Yes, ISO 27018 maps directly to ISO 27001 Annex A (93 controls), ISO 27002, ISO 27017 (cloud security), and ISO 27701 (PIMS). Its privacy principles (consent, transparency, data minimization) align with GDPR Article 28, OECD guidelines, and ISO/IEC 29100, enabling integrated ISMS implementation.

What is the first step to begin implementing ISO 27018?

Conduct a gap analysis against current ISMS practices and ISO 27018 controls. Engage stakeholders for discovery, review documentation/Statement of Applicability, identify deficiencies in areas like subprocessor transparency and breach notification, then develop a prioritized remediation roadmap.

What is the primary objective of MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)?

The primary objective of MLPS 2.0 is to establish a graded cybersecurity protection system ensuring security controls match the potential harm from system compromise to national security, social order, and public interests. It classifies information systems into five levels (1-5) based on impact severity, mandating commensurate technical, management, physical, and personnel controls per GB/T 22239-2019 and related standards. This framework, anchored in China's 2017 Cybersecurity Law Article 21, covers all network operators, integrating common baselines with extensions for cloud, IoT, big data, and industrial controls.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)?

All network operators in mainland China must comply with MLPS 2.0, including domestic firms, foreign-invested enterprises, and multinationals with local systems. Virtually every entity operating networks or information systems—such as IT, cloud platforms, IoT, or industrial controls—is subject, with critical sectors (energy, finance, telecom) often at Level 3+. Enforcement by Ministry of Public Security and local PSBs applies universally, regardless of size.

Does MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme) require an external audit or third-party certification?

Yes, MLPS 2.0 requires external security reviews by licensed Chinese firms for Level 2+ systems, with PSB approval and scoring of at least 75/100. Level 1 needs only self-assessment; higher levels demand invasive audits covering architecture, controls, policies, and documentation, followed by formal certification filing.

How often should an assessment for MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme) be performed?

Assessments under MLPS 2.0 must occur periodically: biennially for Level 2, annually for Level 3, semi-annually for Level 4, and as mandated for Level 5. Re-evaluations are also required after major changes (e.g., cloud migration), combining self-inspections, third-party audits, and PSB oversight.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)?

Non-compliance with MLPS 2.0 risks administrative fines up to 100,000 yuan, operational suspensions, system shutdowns, and intensified PSB inspections. Enforcement links to business license renewals; severe cases involve blacklisting or criminal liability, as seen in financial fines exceeding RMB 200 million.

Can MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme) be mapped to other international frameworks?

Yes, MLPS 2.0 control domains (governance, physical, technical) map to frameworks like ISO 27001 Annex A and NIST CSF. Organizations leverage existing ISMS Statements of Applicability for gap analysis, though MLPS adds prescriptive grading, PSB oversight, and data localization unique to China.

What is the first step to begin implementing MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)?

The first step is conducting a provisional self-assessment to classify systems into Levels 1-5 based on impact to national security, social order, and public interests. Inventory assets, evaluate harm severity per GB/T 22240-2020, document rationale, then file with local PSB for Level 2+ validation.

Standards Comparison

ISO 27018 vs MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)

ISO 27018

Voluntary

2019

International code for PII protection in public clouds

MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)

Mandatory

N/A

China's mandatory graded cybersecurity protection framework

Quick Verdict

ISO 27018 provides voluntary PII controls for global cloud processors within ISO 27001, building trust. MLPS 2.0 mandates graded cybersecurity for all China networks, enforced by PSBs. Companies adopt ISO 27018 for market edge; MLPS for legal compliance.

Cloud Privacy

ISO 27018

ISO/IEC 27018:2019 Code of practice for cloud PII protection

Cost

€€€

Complexity

Medium

Implementation Time

6-12 months

Key Features

Provides privacy-specific controls for public cloud PII processors
Mandates subprocessor transparency and customer notifications
Requires prompt PII breach notifications to controllers
Prohibits secondary PII use without explicit consent
Supports data subject rights like access and erasure

Standard

MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)

Multi-Level Protection Scheme 2.0

Cost

€€€€

Complexity

Medium

Implementation Time

12-18 months

Key Features

Five-level classification by compromise impact
Mandatory for China network operators
Graded technical controls for cloud IoT ICS
Governance personnel separation of duties
Third-party audits PSB approval Level 2+

Detailed Analysis

A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

ISO 27018 Details

What It Is

ISO/IEC 27018:2019 is a code of practice extending ISO 27001 and ISO 27002 for protecting personally identifiable information (PII) in public clouds where providers act as processors. Its primary scope targets cloud-specific privacy risks like multi-tenancy and cross-border flows, using a risk-based approach within an ISMS.

Key Components

~25-30 additional privacy controls mapped to ISO 27001 Annex A themes (organizational, people, physical, technological).
Core principles: consent/choice, purpose limitation, data minimization, transparency, accountability.
Integrated into Statement of Applicability; no standalone certification—assessed during ISO 27001 audits.

Why Organizations Use It

CSPs adopt it for customer trust, procurement acceleration via SoA, GDPR Article 28 alignment, cyber insurance benefits, and differentiation. It reduces security questionnaire friction and demonstrates processor diligence.

Implementation Overview

Start with gap analysis against existing ISMS, integrate controls, update contracts/DPAs. Applicable to CSPs of all sizes; requires third-party audits as ISO 27001 extension, with annual surveillance. (178 words)

MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme) Details

What It Is

MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme 2.0) is China's legally enforceable cybersecurity regulation operationalizing Article 21 of the 2016 Cybersecurity Law. It mandates classifying information systems into five protection levels based on potential harm to national security, social order, and public interests, with graded technical, governance, and organizational controls defined in standards like GB/T 22239-2019.

Key Components

Domains: physical security, network protection, data security, access control, monitoring, governance.
Common baseline controls plus level-specific extensions for cloud, IoT, ICS, big data.
Five levels (1-5) with escalating requirements.
Compliance via third-party audits (≥75/100 score) and PSB approval.

Why Organizations Use It

Mandatory for all mainland China network operators to avoid fines, suspensions.
Enhances resilience, integrates with ISO 27001/NIST.
Builds PSB trust, supports license renewals, market access.

Implementation Overview

Phased: inventory, classify, gap analysis, remediate, audit, re-evaluate.
Targets enterprises in China; complex for multinationals.
Level 3+ needs annual audits, tens of thousands USD yearly.

Key Differences

Aspect	ISO 27018	MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)
Scope	PII protection in public clouds for processors	Graded protection of all networks/systems in China
Industry	Cloud service providers globally, all industries	All network operators in China, all sectors
Nature	Voluntary code of practice, ISO 27001 extension	Mandatory regulation enforced by public security
Testing	Assessed in ISO 27001 audits, no standalone cert	Third-party evaluations, PSB approval for Level 2+
Penalties	Loss of certification, market disadvantage	Fines, operational suspension, law enforcement actions

Scope

ISO 27018

PII protection in public clouds for processors

MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)

Graded protection of all networks/systems in China

Industry

ISO 27018

Cloud service providers globally, all industries

MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)

All network operators in China, all sectors

Nature

ISO 27018

Voluntary code of practice, ISO 27001 extension

MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)

Mandatory regulation enforced by public security

Testing

ISO 27018

Assessed in ISO 27001 audits, no standalone cert

MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)

Third-party evaluations, PSB approval for Level 2+

Penalties

ISO 27018

Loss of certification, market disadvantage

MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)

Fines, operational suspension, law enforcement actions

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about ISO 27018 and MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)

ISO 27018 FAQ

MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme) FAQ

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

5 Ways Modern Compliance Software Makes Evolving Regulations Your Strategic Advantage

Discover 5 ways modern compliance software turns evolving regulations into strategic advantage. Automate monitoring, cut 3x non-compliance costs, stay audit-rea

How to Implement CIS Controls v8.1 as a ‘Control Backbone’ for NIS2 & DORA (Step-by-Step Implementation Guide)

Deploy CIS Controls v8.1 as a control backbone for NIS2 & DORA compliance. Step-by-step roadmap (IG1→IG2), deliverables, metrics & evidence model for hybrid/clo

NIST 800-53 Private Sector ROI Uncovered: 2025 Podcast Deep Dive into Control Family Impact on $10M+ Breach Aversions

Uncover NIST 800-53 ROI in healthcare & finance: RA, SI, IR controls break even after 1-2 incidents ($100K-$10M savings). Podcast deep dive with CISO metrics fo

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

100+ Standards & Regulations

AI-Powered Insights

Collaborative Assessments

Actionable Recommendations

Explore More Comparisons

See how ISO 27018 and MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme) compare against other standards

Other ISO 27018 Comparisons

Other MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme) Comparisons

What It Is

Key Components

~25-30 additional privacy controls mapped to ISO 27001 Annex A themes (organizational, people, physical, technological).

Core principles: consent/choice, purpose limitation, data minimization, transparency, accountability.

Integrated into Statement of Applicability; no standalone certification—assessed during ISO 27001 audits.

What It Is

Key Components

Domains: physical security, network protection, data security, access control, monitoring, governance.

Common baseline controls plus level-specific extensions for cloud, IoT, ICS, big data.

Five levels (1-5) with escalating requirements.

Compliance via third-party audits (≥75/100 score) and PSB approval.

Aspect

ISO 27018

MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)

Scope

PII protection in public clouds for processors

Graded protection of all networks/systems in China

Industry

Cloud service providers globally, all industries

All network operators in China, all sectors

Nature

Voluntary code of practice, ISO 27001 extension

Mandatory regulation enforced by public security

Testing

Assessed in ISO 27001 audits, no standalone cert

Third-party evaluations, PSB approval for Level 2+

Penalties

Loss of certification, market disadvantage

Fines, operational suspension, law enforcement actions