Standards Comparison

    ISO 31000

    Voluntary
    2018

    International guidelines for enterprise risk management

    VS

    BREEAM

    Voluntary
    1990

    Global sustainability certification framework for built environment

    Quick Verdict

    ISO 31000 provides voluntary risk management guidelines for all organizations worldwide, while BREEAM offers certifiable sustainability assessments for buildings. Companies adopt ISO 31000 for resilient decisions and BREEAM for verified green credentials and asset value.

    Risk Management

    ISO 31000

    ISO 31000:2018, Risk management — Guidelines

    Cost
    €€€
    Complexity
    Medium
    Implementation Time
    12-18 months

    Key Features

    • Eight principles for integrated risk management
    • Non-certifiable guidelines for flexibility
    • Framework embeds risk in governance
    • Iterative process identifies and treats risks
    • Universal applicability across organizations
    Building Sustainability

    BREEAM

    Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method

    Cost
    €€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    12-18 months

    Key Features

    • Credit-based scoring with category weightings
    • Third-party certification by licensed assessors and BRE
    • 10 core sustainability categories like Energy, Health
    • Scheme adaptations for new construction, in-use, infrastructure
    • Knowledge Base Compliance Notes for continuous updates

    Detailed Analysis

    A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

    ISO 31000 Details

    What It Is

    ISO 31000:2018, Risk management — Guidelines is a principles-based international standard providing flexible guidance for managing uncertainty's effect on objectives. It applies to any organization, focusing on creating and protecting value through systematic risk practices.

    Key Components

    • **Three pillars8 principles (e.g., integrated, customized, dynamic), framework (leadership, integration, evaluation), and process (communication, assessment, treatment, monitoring).
    • No fixed controls; emphasizes PDCA cycle.
    • Non-certifiable, guideline-only model.

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Enhances decision-making, resilience, and governance.
    • Drives value creation, opportunity capture, stakeholder trust.
    • Aligns with regulations, reduces losses, boosts efficiency.
    • Competitive edge via integrated risk culture.

    Implementation Overview

    • Phased: leadership commitment, framework design, process rollout, continual improvement.
    • Customizable for size/sector; involves policy, training, tools like registers/dashboards.
    • Universal applicability; no certification, internal audits suffice. (178 words)

    BREEAM Details

    What It Is

    BREEAM (Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method) is a science-led sustainability assessment and third-party certification framework for the built environment. Developed by BRE in 1990, it evaluates buildings, infrastructure, communities across lifecycles. Primary purpose: translate sustainability goals into measurable credits, weighted scores, and ratings (Pass to Outstanding) via category-based structure.

    Key Components

    • Core categories: Management, Health & Wellbeing, Energy, Transport, Water, Materials, Waste, Land Use & Ecology, Pollution, Innovation (10 main).
    • Credits for compliance, prerequisites, evidence requirements; weightings prioritize high-impact areas like energy.
    • Technical manuals, KBCNs for guidance; assessor-led process with BRE audits.
    • Certification: staged (design/post-construction), third-party verified.

    Why Organizations Use It

    • ESG alignment, net-zero strategies, value uplift (up to 12%).
    • Meets planning, investor, tenant demands; EU Taxonomy support.
    • Mitigates risks in operations, resilience, regulations.
    • Builds trust via credible ratings, market premiums, differentiation.

    Implementation Overview

    • Early assessor/AP appointment, integrate into project phases.
    • Evidence collection, modelling, verification; global applicability.
    • BRE certification required; suits all sizes/industries.

    Key Differences

    Scope

    ISO 31000
    Enterprise risk management across all objectives
    BREEAM
    Sustainability performance of built environment

    Industry

    ISO 31000
    All sectors, organizations worldwide
    BREEAM
    Construction, real estate, infrastructure globally

    Nature

    ISO 31000
    Voluntary guidelines, non-certifiable
    BREEAM
    Voluntary certification with third-party audits

    Testing

    ISO 31000
    Internal monitoring, reviews, no certification
    BREEAM
    Licensed assessors, BRE audits for certification

    Penalties

    ISO 31000
    No formal penalties, internal governance risks
    BREEAM
    No penalties, loss of certification/rating

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Common questions about ISO 31000 and BREEAM

    ISO 31000 FAQ

    BREEAM FAQ

    You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

    Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

    Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

    Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

    100+ Standards & Regulations
    AI-Powered Insights
    Collaborative Assessments
    Actionable Recommendations

    Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages