ISO 37301
International standard for compliance management systems
ISO 27017
International standard for cloud-specific information security controls
Quick Verdict
ISO 37301 establishes certifiable compliance management systems for all obligations and risks organization-wide, while ISO 27017 provides cloud-specific security guidance within ISO 27001 ISMS. Companies adopt 37301 for broad governance assurance and 27017 to address cloud shared responsibilities.
ISO 37301
ISO 37301:2021 Compliance management systems – Requirements
Key Features
- Certifiable requirements standard replacing guidance-only ISO 19600
- High-Level Structure enables IMS integration with ISO 9001/27001
- Risk-based compliance obligations identification and assessment
- Leadership commitment and compliance culture emphasis
- Robust whistleblowing channels with anti-retaliation protections
ISO 27017
ISO/IEC 27017:2015 Code of practice for cloud security controls
Key Features
- Clarifies shared responsibilities between CSPs and CSCs
- Adds 7 cloud-specific CLD controls for multi-tenancy
- Provides guidance for 37 ISO 27002 controls in clouds
- Addresses VM hardening and segregation in virtual environments
- Integrates into ISO 27001 audits without standalone certification
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
ISO 37301 Details
What It Is
ISO 37301:2021, titled Compliance management systems – Requirements with guidance for use, is a certifiable international standard for establishing, implementing, maintaining, and improving effective compliance management systems (CMS). It applies universally across organization sizes and sectors, using a risk-based, PDCA (Plan-Do-Check-Act) approach aligned with the ISO High-Level Structure (HLS).
Key Components
- Core clauses: context, leadership, planning, support, operation, performance evaluation, improvement.
- Emphasizes leadership commitment, risk assessment, whistleblowing protections, internal audits, and continual improvement.
- Built on HLS for integration; companion standards like ISO 37302 (effectiveness) and ISO 37303 (competence).
- Certification via accredited bodies like ANAB.
Why Organizations Use It
Drives regulatory compliance, reduces risks/fines, builds integrity culture, enhances stakeholder trust, supports ESG/SDGs, and provides competitive certification edge amid rising enforcement.
Implementation Overview
Phased: gap analysis, obligation register, controls/training, audits. Scalable for SMEs/enterprises; 3-year certification cycles. Involves resources, cultural change, tech platforms.
ISO 27017 Details
What It Is
ISO/IEC 27017:2015 is a code of practice extending ISO/IEC 27002 with cloud-specific guidance for information security controls. It adopts a control-based approach within an ISO 27001 ISMS, focusing on public, private, and hybrid clouds across IaaS, PaaS, and SaaS models. Its primary purpose is to address cloud-unique risks like shared responsibilities and multi-tenancy.
Key Components
- Guidance for 37 ISO 27002 controls adapted to cloud contexts.
- 7 additional CLD controls for shared roles, VM segregation, hardening, admin ops, monitoring, and asset removal.
- Built on ISO 27001 risk management; not standalone certification but integrated into ISO 27001 audits.
Why Organizations Use It
- Meets procurement demands and regulatory overlaps (e.g., GDPR).
- Clarifies CSP-CSC responsibilities, reducing risk gaps.
- Enhances trust, differentiates CSPs, supports multi-framework mapping.
Implementation Overview
- Extend existing ISO 27001 ISMS via risk assessment and control mapping.
- Key activities: document shared responsibilities, configure logging/segregation, audit integration.
- Suited for CSPs, cloud users; global applicability; joint audits in 9-12 months.
Key Differences
| Aspect | ISO 37301 | ISO 27017 |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Compliance obligations, risks, culture across all operations | Cloud-specific information security controls |
| Industry | All sectors, sizes, global applicability | Cloud providers/customers, IT-heavy sectors, global |
| Nature | Certifiable CMS requirements standard, voluntary | Guidance code for 27001, not independently certifiable |
| Testing | ISO 27001-style audits, 3-year certification cycle | Assessed within ISO 27001 audits, no standalone |
| Penalties | Loss of certification, no legal penalties | No certification penalties, implementation gaps |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about ISO 37301 and ISO 27017
ISO 37301 FAQ
ISO 27017 FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

SOC 2 Trust Services Criteria in Plain English: Side-by-Side Decoder for Security, Availability, and Beyond
Decode AICPA Trust Services Criteria from auditor jargon to plain English with side-by-side tables, analogies & TL;DRs. CISOs & founders: implement SOC 2 contro

The 'Black Box' Risk: Why Human-in-the-Loop is the Ultimate Fail-Safe for 2026 Security Operations
Uncover the black box AI risk in security ops. Learn why human-in-the-loop auditing is crucial for 2026. Upskill analysts to ensure data privacy and robust secu

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5.1 Private Sector Tailoring Blueprint: First 5 Steps to Overlay-Driven Compliance with Infographic
Step-by-step blueprint for private sector NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5.1 tailoring using overlays for AI & supply chain risks. Infographic + first 5 steps for ROI-drive
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
NIS2 vs SQF
Compare NIS2 vs SQF: Cyber resilience directive vs GFSI food safety cert. Master scope, reporting, fines & HACCP for food sectors—boost compliance now!
PRINCE2 vs MAS TRM
Compare PRINCE2 vs MAS TRM: project governance powerhouse meets tech risk mastery. Discover differences, strengths & ideal use cases for compliance-driven success. Choose wisely now!
K-PIPA vs Australian Privacy Act
K-PIPA vs Australian Privacy Act: Compare Korea's consent rules, 72h breaches & CPOs with Australia's APPs & NDB scheme. Master APAC compliance gaps now!