ITIL
Best-practices framework for IT service management alignment
SQF
GFSI-benchmarked certification for food safety management
Quick Verdict
ITIL provides flexible ITSM best practices for IT organizations worldwide, while SQF is a rigorous, GFSI-benchmarked certification for food safety in manufacturing and supply chains. Companies adopt ITIL for service efficiency and SQF for regulatory compliance and market access.
ITIL
ITIL 4 IT Service Management Framework
Key Features
- Service Value System (SVS) for end-to-end value co-creation
- 34 flexible practices across general, service, technical categories
- Seven guiding principles directing holistic decision-making
- Four dimensions balancing people, technology, partners, processes
- Continual improvement model embedded in all activities
SQF
Safe Quality Food (SQF) Code Edition 9
Key Features
- Modular: Module 2 system elements + sector GMPs
- HACCP-based Food Safety Plan with validation
- Mandatory full-time SQF Practitioner role
- Traceability, recall, and crisis management plans
- GFSI-benchmarked annual audits with scoring
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
ITIL Details
What It Is
ITIL 4 is a globally recognized best-practices framework for IT Service Management (ITSM), evolved from UK CCTA origins to align IT services with business objectives. It uses a flexible, value-driven Service Value System (SVS) covering strategy to continual improvement.
Key Components
- SVS elements: seven guiding principles (e.g., Focus on Value, Progress Iteratively), governance, Service Value Chain (six activities), 34 practices (14 general, 17 service, 3 technical), continual improvement.
- **Four dimensionsorganizations & people, information & technology, partners & suppliers, value streams & processes.
- Certification via PeopleCert: Foundation to Strategic Leader.
Why Organizations Use It
Drives cost savings, 87% adoption for quality/alignment, risk mitigation ($3M+ breaches), 20% faster resolutions. Enables DevOps/Agile integration, boosts ROI (up to 38:1), enhances satisfaction/reputation.
Implementation Overview
Phased ten-step roadmap: assessment, gap analysis, tailoring, tool integration (CMDB, service desk), training. Suits all sizes/industries; voluntary. Iterative for SMEs/enterprises; 12-18 months typical.
SQF Details
What It Is
Safe Quality Food (SQF) is a GFSI-benchmarked certification program and HACCP-based management system for food safety and quality. Administered by SQFI, it applies across the supply chain from farm to fork, using a risk-based, modular approach with universal Module 2 system elements paired with sector-specific Good Practices.
Key Components
- **Module 2Management commitment, HACCP Food Safety Plan, verification, traceability, food defense, allergens, training.
- Sector modules (e.g., Module 11 for manufacturing GMPs).
- Built on Codex HACCP principles; ~hundreds of auditable clauses.
- Annual third-party audits with scoring (E/G/C/F grades) and certification.
Why Organizations Use It
- Meets retailer/brand requirements as 'license to trade'.
- Reduces recalls, audits, and risks via preventive controls.
- Enhances efficiency, supplier management, resilience.
- Builds trust, aligns with FSMA/EU regs, boosts market access.
Implementation Overview
- Phased: gap analysis, documentation, training, internal audits, certification.
- Suits all sizes/industries; 6-12 months typical.
- Requires SQF Practitioner, records proving 'say-do-prove'.
Key Differences
| Aspect | ITIL | SQF |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | ITSM best practices, service lifecycle, 34 practices | Food safety/quality, HACCP, GMPs, traceability |
| Industry | All IT organizations worldwide, any size | Food manufacturing, supply chain, global sectors |
| Nature | Voluntary ITSM framework, certifications | GFSI-benchmarked certification standard |
| Testing | Certifications, internal practices, no audits | Annual third-party audits, unannounced checks |
| Penalties | No legal penalties, certification loss | Certification loss, market access denial |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about ITIL and SQF
ITIL FAQ
SQF FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...
SOC 2 Trust Services Criteria in Plain English: Side-by-Side Decoder for Security, Availability, and Beyond
Decode AICPA Trust Services Criteria from auditor jargon to plain English with side-by-side tables, analogies & TL;DRs. CISOs & founders: implement SOC 2 contro
Top 10 SOC 2 Audit Pitfalls and Fixes: Real Auditor Red Flags from Type 2 Fieldwork with Evidence Checklists
Discover 10 common SOC 2 Type 2 audit pitfalls like evidence gaps, scope creep, vendor oversights. Get Fail/Pass visuals, client stories, checklists for 95% fir
TISAX Tabletop Exercises for EV Battery Suppliers: Ransomware Drill Scripts and AAR Templates with 2025 ENX Podcast Breakdown
Practical TISAX tabletop scripts for EV battery suppliers facing 'Very High' ASLP. Download ransomware AAR templates, get 2024 ENX lessons & 2025 podcast on VDA
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
AEO vs SOC 2
Discover AEO vs SOC 2: AEO boosts trade facilitation via customs security; SOC 2 ensures data trust. Compare criteria, benefits & strategies for compliance success.
UL Certification vs FSSC 22000
UL Certification vs FSSC 22000: UL excels in product safety marks/testing (Listed/Recognized); FSSC in GFSI food FSMS (ISO 22000+PRPs). Compare for compliance wins!
SOC 2 vs ISO 14064
Compare SOC 2 vs ISO 14064: SOC 2 secures data via Trust Criteria for SaaS; ISO 14064 quantifies GHG emissions for sustainability. Unlock compliance insights—read now!