LEED
Green building certification for sustainable design
APRA CPS 234
Australian prudential standard for information security resilience.
Quick Verdict
LEED offers voluntary green building certification for global projects, driving sustainability and market value. APRA CPS 234 mandates information security for Australian financial entities, ensuring cyber resilience via governance and testing. Organizations adopt LEED for prestige, CPS 234 for regulatory compliance.
LEED
Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design
Key Features
- Third-party GBCI verification ensures credible claims
- 110-point system with prerequisites and credits
- Four tiers: Certified, Silver, Gold, Platinum
- Tailored rating systems for project phases
- Recertification drives continuous performance improvement
APRA CPS 234
APRA Prudential Standard CPS 234 Information Security
Key Features
- Board ultimate responsibility for information security
- Commensurate capability with threats and vulnerabilities
- 72-hour APRA notification for material incidents
- Systematic independent testing and assurance
- Third-party capability assessments and controls
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
LEED Details
What It Is
LEED (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design) is a voluntary, third-party verified green building rating framework by USGBC. It provides a performance-based system for healthy, efficient buildings across design, construction, and operations. Scope covers all building types and phases, using prerequisites for baselines and credits for improvements via weighted points.
Key Components
- Core categories: Sustainable Sites, Water Efficiency, Energy & Atmosphere (highest weighted), Materials & Resources, Indoor Environmental Quality.
- Up to 110 points total, with Innovation and Regional Priority bonuses.
- Rating systems: BD+C, ID+C, O+M, ND, Residential, Cities.
- Certification model: GBCI reviews documentation for tiers Certified (40+), Silver, Gold, Platinum.
Why Organizations Use It
Drives energy savings, risk mitigation, ESG reporting, higher asset values, tenant appeal. Voluntary but incentivized by policies, markets; builds credibility via verification.
Implementation Overview
Phased: gap analysis, scorecard, design integration, commissioning, documentation submission. Applies globally to portfolios; requires multidisciplinary teams, LCCA, recertification for O+M.
APRA CPS 234 Details
What It Is
APRA Prudential Standard CPS 234 (Information Security) is a binding regulation from the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority, effective 1 July 2019. It requires APRA-regulated entities like banks, insurers, and super funds to maintain information security capabilities commensurate with threats and vulnerabilities to information assets. The risk-based approach emphasizes proportionality to asset criticality, sensitivity, and potential impacts on operations and stakeholders.
Key Components
- Board accountability and defined roles/responsibilities
- Information asset registers with classification by criticality/sensitivity
- Policy frameworks directing all parties including third parties
- Controls across asset lifecycle protecting CIA triad
- Incident response plans, systematic testing, internal audit assurance
- 72-hour APRA notification for material incidents; 10-day for control weaknesses No fixed controls; built on commensurate governance, testing, remediation.
Why Organizations Use It
- Mandatory compliance avoids enforcement, penalties, scrutiny
- Minimizes incident likelihood/impact, enhances resilience
- Builds trust, enables partnerships, reduces costs
- Manages third-party risks as own-accountability
Implementation Overview
Phased: gap analysis, governance/policy setup, asset/control implementation, testing/assurance, monitoring. Applies to all APRA entities/groups in Australia, scalable by size/threats. Ongoing APRA notifications, no certification but evidence-driven supervision.
Key Differences
| Aspect | LEED | APRA CPS 234 |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Sustainable building design, energy, water, IEQ across lifecycle | Information security governance, controls, incidents for financial entities |
| Industry | Global building, construction, operations all sectors | Australia financial services (banks, insurers, super funds) |
| Nature | Voluntary third-party certification rating system | Mandatory prudential regulation with enforcement powers |
| Testing | Commissioning, performance verification, GBCI review | Systematic independent control testing, annual reviews, internal audit |
| Penalties | Certification denial or revocation, no legal fines | Regulatory sanctions, remediation orders, potential fines |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about LEED and APRA CPS 234
LEED FAQ
APRA CPS 234 FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

The Tool Landscape for Reaching and Maintaining ISO 27701 Compliance
Discover the top tools for ISO 27701 compliance. Compare functionality, complexity, costs, and benefits to choose the best solution for your privacy program. Ac

Practical Implementation Blueprint for Regulation S-K Item 106: Cybersecurity Governance and Risk Management Disclosures in 10-Ks
Step-by-step guide for Item 106 cybersecurity disclosures in 10-Ks: risk management, board oversight, Inline XBRL templates (Dec 2024 compliance). Templates for

SOC 2 for Bootstrapped SaaS: Lazy Founder's Automation Roadmap with Vanta/Drata Templates
Bootstrapped SaaS founders: Achieve SOC 2 Type 2 in 3 months with Vanta automation (cuts 70% manual work). Free templates, workflows, screenshots, metrics & Sig
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
DORA vs NIST 800-171
Compare DORA vs NIST 800-171: EU finance resilience vs US DoD CUI controls. Uncover key diffs, implementation tips & strategies to align both for superior cyber posture now.
POPIA vs BRC
Compare POPIA vs BRC: Key differences between SA's privacy law & global food safety standards. Unlock compliance strategies, risk insights & implementation tips. Achieve mastery now!
GDPR vs IATF 16949
Explore GDPR vs IATF 16949: EU data privacy law vs automotive quality standard. Uncover key differences, synergies, compliance tips for manufacturers. Boost efficiency now!