SAFe
Framework for scaling Lean-Agile practices enterprise-wide
APRA CPS 234
Australian prudential standard for information security resilience
Quick Verdict
SAFe scales Agile for enterprise software delivery worldwide, while APRA CPS 234 mandates information security resilience for Australian financial institutions. Companies adopt SAFe for agility gains; CPS 234 ensures regulatory compliance and cyber defense.
SAFe
Scaled Agile Framework (SAFe) 6.0
Key Features
- Agile Release Trains (ARTs) coordinate 50-125 members
- Program Increments (PIs) align 8-12 week cadences
- 10 immutable Lean-Agile principles foundationally guide scaling
- Seven core competencies drive Business Agility
- Four configurations scale from Essential to Full
APRA CPS 234
APRA Prudential Standard CPS 234 Information Security
Key Features
- Board ultimate responsibility for information security
- Extends to third-party managed information assets
- 72-hour notification for material security incidents
- Systematic independent testing of controls
- Asset classification by criticality and sensitivity
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
SAFe Details
What It Is
Scaled Agile Framework (SAFe) 6.0 is a comprehensive framework for scaling Lean-Agile practices across large enterprises. Its primary purpose is achieving Business Agility by aligning strategy, execution, and operations in complex software and IT environments. SAFe integrates Agile, Lean, DevOps, and systems thinking through configurable levels from Essential to Full.
Key Components
- Agile Release Trains (ARTs) (50-125 people), Program Increments (PIs) (8-12 weeks), and events like PI Planning and Inspect & Adapt.
- 10 immutable Lean-Agile principles (e.g., economic view, organize around value).
- Seven core competencies (e.g., Lean-Agile Leadership, Continuous Learning Culture).
- Four configurations; certifications via Scaled Agile Academy support knowledge-based adoption.
Why Organizations Use It
Drives faster time-to-market (20-50%), quality improvements, employee engagement; integrates compliance (GDPR, SOC 2). Builds competitive agility, risk-managed delivery; 30% market adoption reflects strategic value and stakeholder trust.
Implementation Overview
Follow **Implementation Roadmapvalue stream mapping, Lean-Agile training (e.g., SAFe Agilist), phased ART launches with RTEs. Suited for large software/IT firms; tools like Jira Align aid. No mandatory certification, but SPC-led rollouts recommended. (178 words)
APRA CPS 234 Details
What It Is
APRA Prudential Standard CPS 234 (Information Security) is a binding prudential regulation for Australian financial institutions regulated by APRA. Effective 1 July 2019, it requires entities to maintain information security capabilities commensurate with threats and vulnerabilities, minimizing impacts on confidentiality, integrity, and availability (CIA) of information assets, including those managed by third parties. It employs a risk-based, assurance-driven model emphasizing governance and evidence-based compliance.
Key Components
- Board ultimate responsibility (para 13) and defined roles (para 14)
- Asset classification by criticality and sensitivity (para 20)
- Commensurate controls across asset lifecycle (para 21)
- Systematic testing program (paras 27-31) and internal audit assurance (paras 32-34)
- Incident response plans with annual testing (paras 23-26) No fixed controls; proportional to risk; supported by PPG 234 guidance.
Why Organizations Use It
- Mandatory for APRA-regulated entities (ADIs, insurers, super funds) to avoid enforcement
- Enhances cyber resilience and operational continuity
- Manages third-party risks effectively
- Builds stakeholder trust and regulatory confidence
Implementation Overview
Phased approach: gap analysis, policy framework, asset inventory, controls, testing, third-party assessments. Applies Australia-wide to regulated sectors; ongoing APRA supervision, no formal certification.
Key Differences
| Aspect | SAFe | APRA CPS 234 |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Scaling Agile for enterprise software/IT | Information security governance and resilience |
| Industry | Software, IT operations, all industries globally | Australian financial services (banks, insurers) |
| Nature | Voluntary framework with certifications | Mandatory prudential regulation with enforcement |
| Testing | PI Planning, Inspect & Adapt workshops | Systematic independent control testing annually |
| Penalties | No legal penalties, certification loss | Regulatory sanctions, fines, license restrictions |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about SAFe and APRA CPS 234
SAFe FAQ
APRA CPS 234 FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

The Tool Landscape for Reaching and Maintaining ISO 27701 Compliance
Discover the top tools for ISO 27701 compliance. Compare functionality, complexity, costs, and benefits to choose the best solution for your privacy program. Ac

Scaling Compliance: How Modern Tools Transform Lean Teams into Regulatory Powerhouses
Discover how compliance monitoring tools empower lean teams to automate real-time checks, ensure GDPR/HIPAA/SOC 2 compliance, and scale oversight efficiently. T

Beyond the Burden: How Intuitive Compliance Software Transforms Daily Workflows
Explore intuitive compliance software that automates workflows, simplifies onboarding, and reduces stress. Cut non-compliance costs 3x and boost efficiency for
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
SAFe vs FISMA
Compare SAFe vs FISMA: Scale agile enterprises with SAFe's Lean-Agile framework while mastering FISMA's risk-based cybersecurity for federal compliance. Boost agility + security now!
ISO 20000 vs ISO 26000
Compare ISO 20000 vs ISO 26000: Certifiable ITSM excellence vs non-certifiable SR guidance. Align service mgmt with ethics for compliance, efficiency & trust. Discover key diffs now!
HIPAA vs GDPR UK
Unlock HIPAA vs GDPR UK: Key differences in privacy rules, security standards & breach notifications for healthcare. Master compliance strategies now!