Standards Comparison

    SAFe

    Voluntary
    2023

    Framework for scaling Lean-Agile practices enterprise-wide

    VS

    APRA CPS 234

    Mandatory
    2019

    Australian prudential standard for information security resilience

    Quick Verdict

    SAFe scales Agile for enterprise software delivery worldwide, while APRA CPS 234 mandates information security resilience for Australian financial institutions. Companies adopt SAFe for agility gains; CPS 234 ensures regulatory compliance and cyber defense.

    Agile Scaling

    SAFe

    Scaled Agile Framework (SAFe) 6.0

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    12-18 months

    Key Features

    • Agile Release Trains (ARTs) coordinate 50-125 members
    • Program Increments (PIs) align 8-12 week cadences
    • 10 immutable Lean-Agile principles foundationally guide scaling
    • Seven core competencies drive Business Agility
    • Four configurations scale from Essential to Full
    Information Security

    APRA CPS 234

    APRA Prudential Standard CPS 234 Information Security

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    12-18 months

    Key Features

    • Board ultimate responsibility for information security
    • Extends to third-party managed information assets
    • 72-hour notification for material security incidents
    • Systematic independent testing of controls
    • Asset classification by criticality and sensitivity

    Detailed Analysis

    A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

    SAFe Details

    What It Is

    Scaled Agile Framework (SAFe) 6.0 is a comprehensive framework for scaling Lean-Agile practices across large enterprises. Its primary purpose is achieving Business Agility by aligning strategy, execution, and operations in complex software and IT environments. SAFe integrates Agile, Lean, DevOps, and systems thinking through configurable levels from Essential to Full.

    Key Components

    • Agile Release Trains (ARTs) (50-125 people), Program Increments (PIs) (8-12 weeks), and events like PI Planning and Inspect & Adapt.
    • 10 immutable Lean-Agile principles (e.g., economic view, organize around value).
    • Seven core competencies (e.g., Lean-Agile Leadership, Continuous Learning Culture).
    • Four configurations; certifications via Scaled Agile Academy support knowledge-based adoption.

    Why Organizations Use It

    Drives faster time-to-market (20-50%), quality improvements, employee engagement; integrates compliance (GDPR, SOC 2). Builds competitive agility, risk-managed delivery; 30% market adoption reflects strategic value and stakeholder trust.

    Implementation Overview

    Follow **Implementation Roadmapvalue stream mapping, Lean-Agile training (e.g., SAFe Agilist), phased ART launches with RTEs. Suited for large software/IT firms; tools like Jira Align aid. No mandatory certification, but SPC-led rollouts recommended. (178 words)

    APRA CPS 234 Details

    What It Is

    APRA Prudential Standard CPS 234 (Information Security) is a binding prudential regulation for Australian financial institutions regulated by APRA. Effective 1 July 2019, it requires entities to maintain information security capabilities commensurate with threats and vulnerabilities, minimizing impacts on confidentiality, integrity, and availability (CIA) of information assets, including those managed by third parties. It employs a risk-based, assurance-driven model emphasizing governance and evidence-based compliance.

    Key Components

    • Board ultimate responsibility (para 13) and defined roles (para 14)
    • Asset classification by criticality and sensitivity (para 20)
    • Commensurate controls across asset lifecycle (para 21)
    • Systematic testing program (paras 27-31) and internal audit assurance (paras 32-34)
    • Incident response plans with annual testing (paras 23-26) No fixed controls; proportional to risk; supported by PPG 234 guidance.

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Mandatory for APRA-regulated entities (ADIs, insurers, super funds) to avoid enforcement
    • Enhances cyber resilience and operational continuity
    • Manages third-party risks effectively
    • Builds stakeholder trust and regulatory confidence

    Implementation Overview

    Phased approach: gap analysis, policy framework, asset inventory, controls, testing, third-party assessments. Applies Australia-wide to regulated sectors; ongoing APRA supervision, no formal certification.

    Key Differences

    Scope

    SAFe
    Scaling Agile for enterprise software/IT
    APRA CPS 234
    Information security governance and resilience

    Industry

    SAFe
    Software, IT operations, all industries globally
    APRA CPS 234
    Australian financial services (banks, insurers)

    Nature

    SAFe
    Voluntary framework with certifications
    APRA CPS 234
    Mandatory prudential regulation with enforcement

    Testing

    SAFe
    PI Planning, Inspect & Adapt workshops
    APRA CPS 234
    Systematic independent control testing annually

    Penalties

    SAFe
    No legal penalties, certification loss
    APRA CPS 234
    Regulatory sanctions, fines, license restrictions

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Common questions about SAFe and APRA CPS 234

    SAFe FAQ

    APRA CPS 234 FAQ

    You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

    Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

    Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

    Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

    100+ Standards & Regulations
    AI-Powered Insights
    Collaborative Assessments
    Actionable Recommendations

    Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages