GRADUM
    FeaturesMaturity ModelsFor CreatorsPricingBlogCompareSupport
    DashboardSign Up Free
    Blog/Compare/MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme) vs NERC CIP
    Standards Comparison

    MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme) vs NERC CIP

    MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)

    Mandatory
    2019

    China's mandatory graded cybersecurity protection scheme

    VS

    NERC CIP

    Mandatory
    2006

    Mandatory standards for BES cybersecurity and reliability

    Quick Verdict

    MLPS 2.0 mandates 5-level protection for China's networks via PSB oversight, while NERC CIP enforces tiered cyber/physical controls for North American grid reliability through FERC audits. Organizations adopt them for legal compliance and critical infrastructure resilience.

    Cybersecurity

    MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)

    Multi-Level Protection Scheme 2.0 (MLPS 2.0)

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    Medium
    Implementation Time
    12-18 months

    Key Features

    • Five-level impact-based classification system
    • Mandatory PSB registration for Level 2+ systems
    • Third-party audits with 70/100 pass score
    • Extended controls for cloud, IoT, ICS
    • Law enforcement oversight and re-evaluations
    Critical Infrastructure Protection

    NERC CIP

    NERC Critical Infrastructure Protection Standards

    Cost
    €€€
    Complexity
    Medium
    Implementation Time
    18-24 months

    Key Features

    • Risk-based BES Cyber System impact categorization
    • Mandatory FERC-enforced annual audits and penalties
    • 35-day patch evaluation and monitoring cadence
    • Electronic/physical security perimeters with logging
    • Incident response, recovery, and supply chain controls

    Detailed Analysis

    A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

    MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme) Details

    What It Is

    MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme 2.0) is China's mandatory cybersecurity regulation under the 2017 Cybersecurity Law (Article 21). It classifies information systems into five levels based on compromise impact to national security, social order, and public interests, using a risk-based, graded protection approach.

    Key Components

    • Core domains: physical security, network protection, data security, access control, monitoring, governance.
    • Standards: GB/T 22239-2019 (basics), GB/T 25070-2019 (technical), GB/T 28448-2019 (evaluation).
    • Common controls for all levels; extended for cloud, IoT, big data, ICS.
    • Compliance via self-classification, third-party audits (Level 2+), PSB approval.

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Legal mandate for all China network operators; avoids fines, suspensions.
    • Enhances resilience, aligns with data laws (DSL, PIPL).
    • Builds regulator trust, enables market access.

    Implementation Overview

    Phased: classify systems, gap analysis, remediate, audit, file with PSBs. Applies to all sizes in China; Level 3+ needs annual re-evaluations. Costs tens of thousands USD yearly for audits.

    NERC CIP Details

    What It Is

    NERC Critical Infrastructure Protection (CIP) standards are mandatory reliability regulations developed by the North American Electric Reliability Corporation. They protect the Bulk Electric System (BES) from cyber and physical threats that could cause misoperation or instability. The approach is risk-based, tiering controls by High, Medium, or Low impact BES Cyber Systems.

    Key Components

    • Core standards: CIP-002 (scoping) to CIP-014 (supply chain/physical security)
    • Pillars: governance (CIP-003), personnel/training (CIP-004), perimeters (CIP-005/006), system security (CIP-007), response/recovery (CIP-008/009), configuration (CIP-010)
    • Recurring cycles: 15/35-day reviews, annual audits
    • Compliance via documented evidence, enforced by FERC penalties

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Legal mandate for BES owners/operators in US/Canada/Mexico
    • Mitigates grid instability risks, reduces outages
    • Builds resilience, lowers insurance costs
    • Enhances stakeholder trust, market access

    Implementation Overview

    • Phased: scoping, gap analysis, controls, audits
    • Applies to utilities/transmission entities
    • Multi-year roadmaps, ongoing monitoring/audits (180 words)

    Key Differences

    AspectMLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)NERC CIP
    ScopeAll network systems, 5 protection levels, technical/governance controlsBES Cyber Systems, high/medium/low impact, cyber/physical reliability controls
    IndustryAll sectors in mainland China, broad network operatorsElectric utilities, BES owners/operators in North America
    NatureMandatory Chinese regulation, PSB enforcementMandatory reliability standards, FERC/NERC enforcement
    TestingThird-party audits (75/100 score), periodic PSB reviewsAnnual audits, vulnerability assessments, self-certifications
    PenaltiesFines ~100k yuan, operational suspension, inspectionsCivil penalties up to $1M/day, mitigation plans, license risks

    Scope

    MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)
    All network systems, 5 protection levels, technical/governance controls
    NERC CIP
    BES Cyber Systems, high/medium/low impact, cyber/physical reliability controls

    Industry

    MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)
    All sectors in mainland China, broad network operators
    NERC CIP
    Electric utilities, BES owners/operators in North America

    Nature

    MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)
    Mandatory Chinese regulation, PSB enforcement
    NERC CIP
    Mandatory reliability standards, FERC/NERC enforcement

    Testing

    MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)
    Third-party audits (75/100 score), periodic PSB reviews
    NERC CIP
    Annual audits, vulnerability assessments, self-certifications

    Penalties

    MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)
    Fines ~100k yuan, operational suspension, inspections
    NERC CIP
    Civil penalties up to $1M/day, mitigation plans, license risks

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Common questions about MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme) and NERC CIP

    MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme) FAQ

    NERC CIP FAQ

    You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

    The Tool Landscape for Reaching and Maintaining ISO 27701 Compliance

    The Tool Landscape for Reaching and Maintaining ISO 27701 Compliance

    Discover the top tools for ISO 27701 compliance. Compare functionality, complexity, costs, and benefits to choose the best solution for your privacy program. Ac

    Top 5 Unseen Complexities Modern Compliance Software Effortlessly Manages

    Top 5 Unseen Complexities Modern Compliance Software Effortlessly Manages

    Uncover top 5 unseen complexities modern compliance software manages effortlessly—from sensitive data mapping to real-time regulatory shifts. Automate audits, i

    Proving CIS Controls v8.1 Works: A KPI & Evidence Framework for Board Reporting, Audits, and Continuous Assurance

    Proving CIS Controls v8.1 Works: A KPI & Evidence Framework for Board Reporting, Audits, and Continuous Assurance

    Prove CIS Controls v8.1 effectiveness with KPI catalog, evidence checklist & reporting cadence. Ideal for board reports, audits & cyber-insurance. Measure outco

    Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

    Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

    Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

    100+ Standards & Regulations
    AI-Powered Insights
    Collaborative Assessments
    Actionable Recommendations

    Explore More Comparisons

    See how MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme) and NERC CIP compare against other standards

    Other MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme) Comparisons

    • TISAX vs MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)
    • DORA vs MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)
    • PCI DSS vs MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)
    • CSL (Cyber Security Law of China) vs MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)
    • MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme) vs ISO 27018

    Other NERC CIP Comparisons

    • EN 1090 vs NERC CIP
    • ISO 26000 vs NERC CIP
    • GRI vs NERC CIP
    • EPA vs NERC CIP
    • WEEE vs NERC CIP
    GRADUM

    Transform your assessment process with collaborative, AI-powered maturity evaluations that deliver actionable insights.

    Navigation

    FeaturesMaturity ModelsFor CreatorsPricing

    Legal

    Terms and ConditionsPrivacy PolicyImprintCopyright PolicyCookie Policy

    © 2026 Gradum. All Rights Reserved