What is the primary objective of **MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)**?

**MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme) establishes a graded cybersecurity framework to protect information systems based on potential harm to national security, social order, and public interests.** It classifies systems into five levels (1-5), with controls scaling by impact severity—from minimal harm at Level 1 to grave national security threats at Level 5. Objectives include consistent nationwide baselines, risk-commensurate protections, and law enforcement oversight via MPS and PSBs.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)**?

**All network operators in mainland China must comply with MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme), including domestic firms, foreign-invested enterprises, and multinationals with local systems.** This covers operators of IT networks, cloud services, IoT, big data, and industrial controls, especially in critical sectors like energy, finance, telecom. Virtually all entities with networks qualify; Levels 2+ require PSB filing.

Does **MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**Yes, MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme) mandates external security reviews by licensed Chinese firms for Level 2+ systems, with PSB approval.** Reviews score controls (minimum 75/100) across technical, management, and physical domains, including documentation, testing, and on-site inspections. Certification is ongoing, not one-time.

How often should an assessment for **MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)** be performed?

**MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme) requires periodic re-evaluations: biennially for Level 2, annually for Level 3, semi-annually for Level 4, and as mandated for Level 5.** Reassessments are also triggered by major changes (e.g., cloud migration). Internal self-inspections are continuous.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)**?

**Non-compliance with MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme) results in fines up to 100,000 yuan, operational suspensions, system shutdowns, and intensified PSB inspections.** Enforcement links to license renewals; severe cases involve blacklisting or criminal liability, as seen in financial fines exceeding RMB 200 million.

An **MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme) maps to frameworks like ISO 27001 and NIST CSF via shared domains (organizational, physical, technical controls).** Operators leverage existing ISMS Statements of Applicability for gap analysis, though MLPS adds prescriptive grading, PSB oversight, and data localization not in voluntary standards.

What is the first step to begin implementing **MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)**?

**The first step for MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme) implementation is conducting an impact-based self-classification of systems into Levels 1-5.** Inventory assets, assess harm to national security/social order, document rationale, then file with PSB (Level 2+ within 30 days). Engage cross-functional teams early.

What is the primary objective of **NERC CIP**?

**NERC CIP standards protect the Bulk Electric System (BES) against cyber and physical threats that could cause misoperation or instability.** They mandate risk-based controls for BES Cyber Systems categorized as High, Medium, or Low Impact under CIP-002, spanning governance (CIP-003), perimeters (CIP-005/006), system security (CIP-007), and incident response (CIP-008).

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **NERC CIP**?

**NERC CIP applies to registered entities owning or operating BES Cyber Systems, including Balancing Authorities, Generator Owners/Operators, Transmission Owners/Operators, and limited Distribution Providers.** Scope covers facilities like those with ≥300 MW UFLS/UVLS or Special Protection Systems; exemptions include nuclear-regulated assets.

Oes **NERC CIP** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**NERC CIP requires compliance audits by NERC and Regional Entities, typically annual offsite reviews with 3-5 day on-site inspections.** No third-party certification is mandated; enforcement uses self-certifications, spot checks, and evidence retention for three years per standard.

How often should an assessment for **NERC CIP** be performed?

**NERC CIP mandates recurring assessments: vulnerability assessments every 15 months (paper) or 36 months (active) for High Impact under CIP-010; patch evaluations every 35 days under CIP-007.** Log reviews occur every 15 days with 90-day retention; policy/training reviews every 15 months.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **NERC CIP**?

**Non-compliance with NERC CIP incurs fines up to $1 million per violation per day, enforced by FERC via NERC's CMEP.** Penalties factor Violation Risk Factors, Severity Levels, duration, and base on 2021 Sanction Guidelines; repeat issues escalate to mitigation plans or operating restrictions.

An **NERC CIP** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**NERC CIP-013 supply chain controls and CIP-007 monitoring align with broader cyber standards, enabling mapping.** However, NERC CIP remains BES-specific; no formal mappings are required, but convergences exist in risk-based approaches like asset classification and incident reporting.

What is the first step to begin implementing **NERC CIP**?

**The first step is CIP-002 asset identification: catalog and categorize BES Cyber Systems into High, Medium, or Low Impact using bright-line criteria.** Approve via CIP Senior Manager, review every 15 months, and document to define program scope.

MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme) vs NERC CIP

Standards Comparison

MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)

Mandatory

2019

China's mandatory graded cybersecurity protection scheme

NERC CIP

Mandatory

2006

Mandatory standards for BES cybersecurity and reliability

Quick Verdict

MLPS 2.0 mandates 5-level protection for China's networks via PSB oversight, while NERC CIP enforces tiered cyber/physical controls for North American grid reliability through FERC audits. Organizations adopt them for legal compliance and critical infrastructure resilience.

Cybersecurity

MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)

Multi-Level Protection Scheme 2.0 (MLPS 2.0)

Cost

€€€€

Complexity

Medium

Implementation Time

12-18 months

Key Features

Five-level impact-based classification system
Mandatory PSB registration for Level 2+ systems
Third-party audits with 75/100 pass score
Extended controls for cloud, IoT, ICS
Law enforcement oversight and re-evaluations

Critical Infrastructure Protection

NERC CIP

NERC Critical Infrastructure Protection Standards

Cost

€€€

Complexity

Medium

Implementation Time

18-24 months

Key Features

Risk-based BES Cyber System impact categorization
Mandatory FERC-enforced annual audits and penalties
35-day patch evaluation and monitoring cadence
Electronic/physical security perimeters with logging
Incident response, recovery, and supply chain controls

Detailed Analysis

A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme) Details

What It Is

MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme 2.0) is China's mandatory cybersecurity regulation under the 2017 Cybersecurity Law (Article 21). It classifies information systems into five levels based on compromise impact to national security, social order, and public interests, using a risk-based, graded protection approach.

Key Components

Core domains: physical security, network protection, data security, access control, monitoring, governance.
Standards: GB/T 22239-2019 (basics), GB/T 25070-2019 (technical), GB/T 28448-2019 (evaluation).
Common controls for all levels; extended for cloud, IoT, big data, ICS.
Compliance via self-classification, third-party audits (Level 2+), PSB approval.

Why Organizations Use It

Legal mandate for all China network operators; avoids fines, suspensions.
Enhances resilience, aligns with data laws (DSL, PIPL).
Builds regulator trust, enables market access.

Implementation Overview

Phased: classify systems, gap analysis, remediate, audit, file with PSBs. Applies to all sizes in China; Level 3+ needs annual re-evaluations. Costs tens of thousands USD yearly for audits.

NERC CIP Details

What It Is

NERC Critical Infrastructure Protection (CIP) standards are mandatory reliability regulations developed by the North American Electric Reliability Corporation. They protect the Bulk Electric System (BES) from cyber and physical threats that could cause misoperation or instability. The approach is risk-based, tiering controls by High, Medium, or Low impact BES Cyber Systems.

Key Components

Core standards: CIP-002 (scoping) to CIP-014 (supply chain/physical security)
Pillars: governance (CIP-003), personnel/training (CIP-004), perimeters (CIP-005/006), system security (CIP-007), response/recovery (CIP-008/009), configuration (CIP-010)
Recurring cycles: 15/35-day reviews, annual audits
Compliance via documented evidence, enforced by FERC penalties

Why Organizations Use It

Legal mandate for BES owners/operators in US/Canada/Mexico
Mitigates grid instability risks, reduces outages
Builds resilience, lowers insurance costs
Enhances stakeholder trust, market access

Implementation Overview

Phased: scoping, gap analysis, controls, audits
Applies to utilities/transmission entities
Multi-year roadmaps, ongoing monitoring/audits (180 words)