What is the primary objective of **SAFe**?

**The primary objective of SAFe is to scale Lean-Agile practices across large enterprises to achieve Business Agility by aligning strategy, execution, and operations.** SAFe, originating from Dean Leffingwell's 2007 book and publicly released in 2011, integrates 10 immutable Lean-Agile principles (e.g., economic view, systems thinking, organize around value) and seven core competencies (e.g., Lean-Agile Leadership, Team and Technical Agility, Continuous Learning Culture) to enable faster time-to-market, improved quality, and employee engagement through structures like Agile Release Trains (ARTs) of 50-125 people and Program Increments (PIs) of 8-12 weeks.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **SAFe**?

**No organizations are legally required to comply with SAFe, as it is a voluntary framework for enterprise agility.** Professionally, large enterprises scaling Agile beyond single teams—particularly in software, IT operations, and regulated sectors like finance or healthcare with hundreds of practitioners—adopt SAFe for alignment, with over 20,000 enterprises and 1 million certified professionals using its configurations from Essential SAFe (single ARTs) to Full SAFe (portfolio-level governance).

Does **SAFe** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**SAFe does not require external audits or third-party certification for core implementation.** Success relies on internal practices like PI Planning, Inspect and Adapt workshops, and Scaled Agile Inc. certifications (e.g., SAFe Agilist, RTE, SPC) via academy training, with phased rollouts assessed through maturity models and metrics like velocity and flow, though regulated industries embed compliance via 'trust but verify' roles.

How often should an assessment for **SAFe** be performed?

**SAFe assessments should be performed continuously via Inspect and Adapt workshops at the end of each 8-12 week Program Increment (PI).** Additional maturity assessments occur pre-implementation (e.g., value stream mapping) and ongoing through PI metrics (e.g., PI Objectives, flow measures), with leadership reviews aligning to PI cadence for relentless improvement across ARTs and portfolios.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **SAFe**?

**Non-compliance with SAFe results in business risks like strategy misalignment, delayed time-to-market, and reduced productivity, with no legal penalties.** Poor implementation leads to pitfalls such as 'SAFe washing,' dependency chaos, or 30-70% failure rates from inadequate training, yielding losses in flow efficiency and quality versus reported gains of 30-75% productivity and 20-50% faster delivery in successful adoptions.

An **SAFe** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, SAFe can be mapped to other frameworks like Scrum, Kanban, LeSS, and DevOps for hybrid implementations.** Its Essential configuration preserves team-level Scrum (2-week iterations) within ARTs, while Large Solution and Portfolio levels extend to DevOps pipelines (e.g., CI/CD via Atlassian Jira) and compliance adaptations (e.g., Lean QMS for GDPR/SOC 2), enabling tailored scaling without prescriptive conflicts.

What is the first step to begin implementing **SAFe**?

**The first step to implement SAFe is to train executives in Lean-Agile Leadership via Leading SAFe (SAFe Agilist) certification.** Follow the Implementation Roadmap: conduct value stream identification and maturity assessments, then launch Essential SAFe with an ART, supported by SPC coaching for PI Planning and role definitions like RTE.

What is the primary objective of **ISO 27018**?

**ISO 27018's primary objective is to provide a code of practice for protecting **Personally Identifiable Information (PII)** in public clouds where the cloud service provider (CSP) acts as a PII processor.** It extends **ISO 27001** and **ISO 27002** with ~25–30 privacy-specific controls addressing cloud risks like multi-tenancy, subprocessor transparency, consent, purpose limitation, data minimization, breach notification, and restrictions on secondary PII use (e.g., no marketing without consent). The 2025 edition aligns with **ISO 27002:2022**, emphasizing processor obligations across the PII lifecycle.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **ISO 27018**?

**ISO 27018 applies to public **CSPs** acting as **PII processors** for customers, with no universal legal mandate but strong professional expectations in regulated sectors.** Targeted at hyperscalers, regional providers, and sector-specific clouds (e.g., healthcare, finance), it enables compliance with processor duties under laws like GDPR Article 28. Controllers use it for vendor due diligence; implementation is risk-based, scalable by organization size.

Does **ISO 27018** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**ISO 27018 does not support standalone certification; controls are assessed via external audits as part of an **ISO 27001** certification by accredited bodies under **ISO/IEC 17021** and **ISO/IEC 27006*.** Auditors review integration into the **ISMS** and **Statement of Applicability (SoA)** during Stage 1 (documents) and Stage 2 (effectiveness) audits, with certificates referencing both standards.

How often should an assessment for **ISO 27018** be performed?

**ISO 27018 assessments occur through **ISO 27001** audits: annual surveillance audits post-certification and full recertification every three years.** Organizations conduct internal risk assessments and gap analyses continually, updating the **SoA** for changes in cloud services, subprocessors, or regulations to ensure ongoing control effectiveness.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **ISO 27018**?

**Non-compliance with ISO 27018 risks loss of market trust, procurement delays, cyber insurance issues, and failure to meet processor obligations under privacy laws like GDPR.** As a voluntary code, direct penalties are absent, but misalignment exposes CSPs to contractual breaches, regulatory fines via underlying laws, and competitive disadvantage without audited **SoA** transparency.

Can **ISO 27018** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, ISO 27018 maps directly to **ISO 27001 Annex A** (93 controls), **ISO 27002:2022**, **ISO 27017** (cloud security), and **ISO 27701** (PIMS for controllers/processors).** It aligns with GDPR Article 28, OECD guidelines, and **ISO/IEC 29100** privacy principles, enabling unified **ISMS** integration and regulatory demonstrations without standalone certification.

What is the first step to begin implementing **ISO 27018**?

**The first step is conducting a gap analysis of existing **ISO 27001 ISMS** against ISO 27018 controls, documenting findings in a **Statement of Applicability (SoA)**.** Engage stakeholders for risk assessment, prioritize privacy controls (e.g., subprocessor disclosure, breach notification), and develop a roadmap assuming **ISO 27001** prerequisite.

SAFe vs ISO 27018

Standards Comparison

SAFe

Voluntary

2023

Enterprise framework scaling Lean-Agile across large organizations

ISO 27018

Voluntary

2019

International code of practice for cloud PII protection

Quick Verdict

SAFe scales Agile for enterprise software delivery, enabling business agility in IT ops. ISO 27018 protects PII in public clouds via audited controls. Companies adopt SAFe for faster time-to-market; ISO 27018 for privacy compliance and customer trust.

Agile Scaling

SAFe

Scaled Agile Framework (SAFe 6.0)

Cost

€€€€

Complexity

Medium

Implementation Time

18-24 months

Key Features

Agile Release Trains synchronize 50-125 members for value delivery
Program Increments enable 8-12 week predictable planning cycles
Four scalable configurations from Essential to Full SAFe
10 immutable Lean-Agile principles guide economic decision-making
Seven core competencies foster enterprise Business Agility

Cloud Privacy

ISO 27018

ISO/IEC 27018:2025 Code of practice for cloud PII processors

Cost

€€€

Complexity

High

Implementation Time

6-12 months

Key Features

PII protection controls for public cloud processors
Subprocessor transparency and location disclosure
Breach notification obligations to customers
Prohibits PII use for advertising without consent
Supports data subject rights like erasure and access

Detailed Analysis

A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

SAFe Details

What It Is

Scaled Agile Framework (SAFe 6.0) is a comprehensive knowledge base of organizational patterns for scaling Lean-Agile practices across enterprises. It integrates Agile, Lean, and systems thinking to achieve Business Agility, focusing on aligning strategy, execution, and operations in large-scale software and IT environments through configurable levels from Essential to Full SAFe.

Key Components

**Agile Release Trains (ARTs)50-125 cross-functional teams delivering value in Program Increments (PIs).
**10 Lean-Agile PrinciplesImmutable foundation like economic view and value flow.
**Seven Core CompetenciesIncluding Lean-Agile Leadership, Team Agility, and Continuous Learning Culture.
**Roles and EventsRTEs, PI Planning, Inspect & Adapt; no formal certification but extensive training ecosystem.

Why Organizations Use It

Drives faster time-to-market (20-50%), quality improvements, and employee engagement. Enables compliance in regulated industries via embedded governance. Reduces silos, enhances flow, builds stakeholder trust through predictable delivery and metrics.

Implementation Overview

Phased roadmap: value stream mapping, leadership training (SAFe Agilist), ART launches. Applies to large enterprises in software/IT; tools like Jira Align. Success via SPC coaching, ongoing Inspect & Adapt; 30% adoption reflects enterprise-scale benefits.

ISO 27018 Details

What It Is

ISO/IEC 27018:2025 is an international code of practice extending ISO/IEC 27001 and ISO/IEC 27002 specifically for protecting personally identifiable information (PII) processed by public cloud service providers acting as PII processors. Its scope targets cloud-specific privacy risks like multi-tenancy and cross-border flows, using a risk-based control implementation within an Information Security Management System (ISMS).

Key Components

Adds ~25–30 privacy-specific controls to ISO 27001 Annex A (Organizational, People, Physical, Technological themes)
Core principles: consent/choice, purpose limitation, data minimization, accuracy, retention limits, transparency, accountability, security safeguards
Integrated into ISO 27001 audits; no standalone certification—via Statement of Applicability

Why Organizations Use It

Accelerates procurement, builds customer trust, differentiates CSPs
Aligns with GDPR Article 28, HIPAA processor duties
Reduces risks, supports cyber insurance, enhances reputation

Implementation Overview

Gap analysis, ISMS integration, policy/training updates, technical safeguards
Applies to CSPs all sizes/industries; third-party audits in ISO 27001 cycles
Focus: subprocessors, breaches, data rights support

Key Differences

Aspect	SAFe	ISO 27018
Scope	Scaling Agile for enterprise software/IT delivery	PII protection in public cloud processing
Industry	Software, IT ops, regulated sectors worldwide	Cloud providers, all sectors handling PII globally
Nature	Voluntary agile scaling framework	Voluntary code of practice for certification
Testing	PI planning, Inspect & Adapt workshops	ISO 27001 audits with annual surveillance
Penalties	No legal penalties, implementation failure risks	No legal penalties, loss of certification

Scope

SAFe

Scaling Agile for enterprise software/IT delivery

ISO 27018

PII protection in public cloud processing

Industry

SAFe

Software, IT ops, regulated sectors worldwide

ISO 27018

Cloud providers, all sectors handling PII globally

Nature

SAFe

Voluntary agile scaling framework

ISO 27018

Voluntary code of practice for certification

Testing

SAFe

PI planning, Inspect & Adapt workshops

ISO 27018

ISO 27001 audits with annual surveillance

Penalties

SAFe

No legal penalties, implementation failure risks

ISO 27018

No legal penalties, loss of certification

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about SAFe and ISO 27018

SAFe FAQ

ISO 27018 FAQ

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

Top 10 SOC 2 Mistakes Startups Make (and Fixes with Automation)

Avoid top 10 SOC 2 mistakes like scope creep & evidence gaps. See fail/pass visuals, client quotes, Vanta/Drata automation fixes for bootstrapped startups. Quic

The CIS Controls v8.1 Evidence Pack: What Auditors Ask For (and How to Produce Proof Fast)

Fail CIS Controls v8.1 audits due to missing evidence? Get the blueprint: exact artifacts auditors want, repository structure, and automation from security tool

CIS Controls v8.1 for Cloud & SaaS: A Practical Safeguard Playbook for AWS/Azure/GCP and Microsoft 365

Turn CIS Controls v8.1 into a cloud-first playbook for AWS, Azure, GCP & Microsoft 365. Get actionable IaaS/PaaS/SaaS safeguards, automation patterns, evidence

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

100+ Standards & Regulations

AI-Powered Insights

Collaborative Assessments

Actionable Recommendations

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

ISO 37301 vs ISO 21001

ISO 37301 vs ISO 21001: Compliance CMS (risk, ethics, certifiable) meets learner-centric EOMS (PDCA, equity). Uncover differences, benefits & integration for your org now!

ISO 27001 vs PRINCE2

Compare ISO 27001 vs PRINCE2: ISO 27001 delivers resilient ISMS for security compliance; PRINCE2 structures projects for controlled success. Optimize your strategy now!

WEEE vs WCAG

Discover WEEE vs WCAG: EU e-waste Directive (2012/19/EU) meets web accessibility gold standard. Compare scopes, compliance & strategies for circular economy success. Dive in!

SAFe

ISO 27018

Quick Verdict

SAFe

Key Features

ISO 27018

Key Features

Detailed Analysis

SAFe Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

ISO 27018 Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

Key Differences

Scope

Industry

Nature

Testing

Penalties

Frequently Asked Questions

SAFe FAQ

What is the primary objective of SAFe?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with SAFe?

Does SAFe require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for SAFe be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with SAFe?

An SAFe be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing SAFe?

ISO 27018 FAQ

What is the primary objective of ISO 27018?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with ISO 27018?

Does ISO 27018 require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for ISO 27018 be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with ISO 27018?

Can ISO 27018 be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing ISO 27018?

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

Top 10 SOC 2 Mistakes Startups Make (and Fixes with Automation)

The CIS Controls v8.1 Evidence Pack: What Auditors Ask For (and How to Produce Proof Fast)

CIS Controls v8.1 for Cloud & SaaS: A Practical Safeguard Playbook for AWS/Azure/GCP and Microsoft 365

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

ISO 37301 vs ISO 21001

ISO 27001 vs PRINCE2

WEEE vs WCAG