What is the primary objective of **NIST 800-53**?

**NIST SP 800-53 provides a catalog of security and privacy controls to protect organizational operations, assets, individuals, other organizations, and the Nation from diverse threats including hostile attacks, human errors, natural disasters, structural failures, foreign intelligence, and privacy risks.** Revision 5 organizes 20 control families (e.g., AC Access Control, AU Audit and Accountability, SR Supply Chain Risk Management) with over 1,100 base controls and enhancements, emphasizing **functionality** (safeguard strength) and **assurance** (effectiveness confidence). Controls are outcome-based, flexible, and integrated into the **Risk Management Framework (RMF)** per SP 800-37 for risk-managed selection, tailoring, implementation, assessment (SP 800-53A), authorization, and monitoring.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **NIST 800-53**?

**Federal agencies and contractors processing federal information or systems are legally required to implement NIST SP 800-53 controls under FISMA and OMB A-130.** SP 800-53B mandates minimum baselines (low/moderate/high per FIPS 199 impact levels) for federal systems. Contractors face contractual obligations; cloud providers seek **FedRAMP** authorization mapping to 800-53 subsets. Voluntary adoption applies to state/local governments, critical infrastructure, and private entities for robust programs, with SP 800-53B baselines usable by any organization.

Does **NIST 800-53** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**No, NIST SP 800-53 does not require external audits or third-party certification; it mandates internal control implementation, assessment, and authorization via RMF.** SP 800-53A provides assessment procedures for effectiveness verification by qualified assessors, who may be internal or independent. Authorizing Officials issue **Authorization to Operate (ATO)** based on **Security Assessment Reports (SAR)** and **POA&Ms**, supporting reciprocity without formal certification.

How often should an assessment for **NIST 800-53** be performed?

**NIST SP 800-53 requires continuous monitoring with periodic full assessments via RMF and SP 800-53A procedures.** **CA-7 (Continuous Monitoring)** mandates ongoing control effectiveness evaluation, with high-impact controls assessed near-real-time and others quarterly/annually based on risk. Reassessments occur post-changes, annually, or per **system categorization** (FIPS 199).

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **NIST 800-53**?

**Non-compliance with NIST SP 800-53 for federal entities risks FISMA violations, contract termination, fines ($10K–$50K per violation), audit findings, and loss of ATO.** Agencies face OMB oversight, IG audits, and funding cuts; contractors lose eligibility for federal work or **FedRAMP**. Operationally, it amplifies breach costs (avg. $4.45M per IBM), downtime, and reputational damage.

Can **NIST 800-53** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, NIST provides official mappings from SP 800-53 Rev. 5 to NIST CSF 2.0, NIST Privacy Framework, and ISO/IEC 27001:2022, indicating coverage relationships.** SP 800-53B and OLIR crosswalks support multi-framework alignment, but mappings show coverage, not strict equivalence; organizations must validate for specific requirements.

What is the first step to begin implementing **NIST 800-53**?

**The first step is system categorization per FIPS 199 to determine low/moderate/high impact levels for confidentiality, integrity, and availability.** This informs baseline selection from SP 800-53B, followed by tailoring, ODPs, and RMF Prepare step.

What is the primary objective of **BREEAM**?

**BREEAM's primary objective is to provide a science-based sustainability assessment and certification framework for the built environment.** Developed by BRE in 1990, it evaluates performance across 10 core categories—**Management, Health & Wellbeing, Energy, Transport, Water, Materials, Waste, Land Use & Ecology, Pollution, and Innovation**—using a weighted credit system that yields ratings from **Pass (≥30%)** to **Outstanding (≥85%)**. This converts sustainability ambitions into measurable, audited outcomes for new construction, in-use assets, infrastructure, and communities.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **BREEAM**?

**No organizations are legally required to comply with BREEAM, as it is a voluntary certification scheme.** Professionally, it applies to developers, owners, and operators of buildings, infrastructure, and communities seeking market differentiation, ESG credibility, or alignment with planning incentives. Licensed **BREEAM Assessors** and **Advisory Professionals (APs)** are mandatory for certification, with BRE Global providing quality audits under **ISO/IEC 17065** accreditation.

Does **BREEAM** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**Yes, BREEAM mandates third-party certification through licensed Assessors and BRE Global quality audits.** Assessors compile evidence against scheme-specific technical manuals and submit for BRE review, which includes sampling, potential site visits, and issuance of the rating certificate. This ensures impartiality and credibility.

How often should an assessment for **BREEAM** be performed?

**BREEAM New Construction assessments occur at design and post-construction stages, while In-Use certifications require reassessment every 3 years.** Operational schemes like **BREEAM In-Use** demand periodic renewal to verify ongoing performance via post-occupancy evaluation and evidence updates.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **BREEAM**?

**Non-compliance with BREEAM results in no certification and missed market benefits, as it is voluntary with no legal penalties.** Consequences include forfeited ESG reporting value, reduced asset premiums (e.g., up to 30% sale uplift), higher operational costs, and planning delays where local authorities incentivize ratings.

Can **BREEAM** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**BREEAM does not officially map to other frameworks within its standalone schemes, though Version 7 aligns with EU Taxonomy for technical issues.** National Scheme Operators in **Austria, Germany, Netherlands, Norway, Spain, and Sweden** adapt schemes locally, maintaining core methodology for global comparability.

What is the first step to begin implementing **BREEAM**?

**The first step is to select the appropriate scheme (e.g., New Construction, In-Use) and appoint a licensed BREEAM Assessor early at project inception.** This enables pre-assessment, credit targeting, and integration into design, supported by BRE technical manuals and Knowledge Base Compliance Notes (KBCNs).

NIST 800-53 vs BREEAM

Standards Comparison

NIST 800-53

Mandatory

2020

U.S. catalog of security and privacy controls framework

BREEAM

Voluntary

1990

Global sustainability certification framework for built environment.

Quick Verdict

NIST 800-53 provides security/privacy controls for federal systems and adopters managing cyber risks, while BREEAM certifies sustainable building performance across design-to-operations. Organizations adopt NIST for compliance/resilience, BREEAM for ESG value, energy savings, and market premiums.

Security Controls

NIST 800-53

NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5: Security and Privacy Controls

Cost

€€€

Complexity

Medium

Implementation Time

18-24 months

Key Features

20 control families with 1,100+ outcome-based controls
Risk-based low/moderate/high baselines in SP 800-53B
Integrated privacy baseline regardless of impact level
Tailoring and overlays for customized risk management
OSCAL machine-readable formats enabling automation

Building Sustainability

BREEAM

Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method

Cost

€€€

Complexity

High

Implementation Time

12-18 months

Key Features

Credit-based scoring with weighted sustainability categories
Third-party certification via licensed assessors and BRE audits
Lifecycle schemes for new build, in-use, and infrastructure
Alignment with net zero, whole-life carbon, and EU Taxonomy
Knowledge Base Compliance Notes for continuous updates

Detailed Analysis

A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

NIST 800-53 Details

What It Is

NIST SP 800-53 Revision 5 is a comprehensive U.S. federal control catalog for security and privacy in information systems and organizations. Its primary purpose is to protect against diverse threats via risk-managed safeguards, using an outcome-based, flexible approach integrated with the Risk Management Framework (RMF).

Key Components

20 control families (e.g., AC, AU, PT, SR) with over 1,100 controls and enhancements.
Baselines (low/moderate/high/privacy) in SP 800-53B for FIPS 199 impact levels.
Tailoring, parameters, overlays; linked to SP 800-53A assessments.
OSCAL for machine-readable implementation; no formal certification, but RMF authorization.

Why Organizations Use It

Mandated by FISMA/OMB A-130 for federal systems/contractors.
Enables resilience, reciprocity, automation; voluntary for private sector.
Reduces risks, supports FedRAMP/cloud, builds trust via audit-ready evidence.

Implementation Overview

Follow **RMFcategorize, select/tailor baselines, implement, assess, authorize, monitor. Applies to federal/non-federal; high complexity needs phased rollout, automation, governance; audits via continuous monitoring.

BREEAM Details

What It Is

BREEAM (Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method) is a science-led sustainability certification framework for the built environment. It assesses environmental, social, and resilience performance across buildings, infrastructure, and communities using a credit-based, weighted scoring methodology that yields ratings from Pass to Outstanding.

Key Components

**10 core categoriesManagement, Health & Wellbeing, Energy, Transport, Water, Materials, Waste, Land Use & Ecology, Pollution, Innovation.
Credits awarded for compliance with evidence-based criteria; categories weighted by impact (e.g., high for Energy).
Built on technical manuals, KBCNs, and third-party assurance via licensed assessors and BRE audits.
Schemes for lifecycle stages: New Construction, In-Use, Refurbishment, Infrastructure.

Why Organizations Use It

Drives ESG compliance, net zero alignment, and EU Taxonomy readiness.
Delivers energy savings (22-33%), asset value uplift (up to 30%), and risk mitigation.
Enhances market differentiation, tenant appeal, and regulatory planning advantages.

Implementation Overview

Phased approach: early assessor appointment, credit targeting, evidence gathering, BRE certification.
Applies globally with local adaptations; suits all sizes via assessors and training.

Key Differences

Aspect	NIST 800-53	BREEAM
Scope	Security/privacy controls for info systems	Sustainability assessment for built environment
Industry	Federal/contractors, all sectors globally voluntary	Construction/real estate, global buildings/infrastructure
Nature	Voluntary control catalog/framework	Voluntary third-party certification scheme
Testing	SP 800-53A procedures, continuous monitoring	Licensed assessors, BRE quality audits
Penalties	No legal penalties, FISMA/contractual risks	No penalties, loss of certification/rating

Scope

NIST 800-53

Security/privacy controls for info systems

BREEAM

Sustainability assessment for built environment

Industry

NIST 800-53

Federal/contractors, all sectors globally voluntary

BREEAM

Construction/real estate, global buildings/infrastructure

Nature

NIST 800-53

Voluntary control catalog/framework

BREEAM

Voluntary third-party certification scheme

Testing

NIST 800-53

SP 800-53A procedures, continuous monitoring

BREEAM

Licensed assessors, BRE quality audits

Penalties

NIST 800-53

No legal penalties, FISMA/contractual risks

BREEAM

No penalties, loss of certification/rating

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about NIST 800-53 and BREEAM

NIST 800-53 FAQ

BREEAM FAQ

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

NIST CSF 2.0 Govern Function Deep Dive: Building Executive Cybersecurity Governance from Scratch

Step-by-step blueprint for NIST CSF 2.0 Govern function: templates, RACI matrices, metrics to elevate cybersecurity governance to boardroom level. Reduce breach

Decoding Tomorrow's Regulations: How Advanced Compliance Tools Predict and Prepare for Future Shifts

Advanced compliance tools use AI, analytics & real-time monitoring to predict regulatory shifts, cut non-compliance costs 3x, and ensure audit readiness. Stay p

From Reactive Gatekeeper to Proactive Strategist: How Compliance Software Reshapes the Compliance Professional's Day

Discover how compliance software automates monitoring, delivers real-time insights, and transforms compliance pros from reactive gatekeepers to proactive strate

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

100+ Standards & Regulations

AI-Powered Insights

Collaborative Assessments

Actionable Recommendations

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

K-PIPA vs AS9110C

Explore K-PIPA vs AS9110C: Korea's strict data privacy law meets aerospace quality standards. Uncover compliance gaps, breach rules, CPO roles & aviation risks. Essential guide—read now!

LGPD vs ISO 13485

Compare LGPD vs ISO 13485: Crucial insights for medtech firms in Brazil. Align data privacy with quality management to dodge fines, boost compliance, and seize market opportunities. Explore now!

K-PIPA vs IATF 16949

Compare K-PIPA vs IATF 16949: Korea's strict privacy law meets automotive quality standards. Master compliance gaps, risks & synergies for global supply chains. Dive in now!

NIST 800-53

BREEAM

Quick Verdict

NIST 800-53

Key Features

BREEAM

Key Features

Detailed Analysis

NIST 800-53 Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

BREEAM Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

Key Differences

Scope

Industry

Nature

Testing

Penalties

Frequently Asked Questions

NIST 800-53 FAQ

What is the primary objective of NIST 800-53?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with NIST 800-53?

Does NIST 800-53 require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for NIST 800-53 be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with NIST 800-53?

Can NIST 800-53 be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing NIST 800-53?

BREEAM FAQ

What is the primary objective of BREEAM?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with BREEAM?

Does BREEAM require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for BREEAM be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with BREEAM?

Can BREEAM be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing BREEAM?

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

NIST CSF 2.0 Govern Function Deep Dive: Building Executive Cybersecurity Governance from Scratch

Decoding Tomorrow's Regulations: How Advanced Compliance Tools Predict and Prepare for Future Shifts

From Reactive Gatekeeper to Proactive Strategist: How Compliance Software Reshapes the Compliance Professional's Day

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

K-PIPA vs AS9110C

LGPD vs ISO 13485

K-PIPA vs IATF 16949