REACH
EU regulation for chemicals registration, evaluation, authorisation, restriction
CIS Controls
Prioritized framework for cybersecurity best practices
Quick Verdict
REACH mandates chemical safety registration and risk management for EU manufacturers and importers, ensuring market access. CIS Controls provide voluntary cybersecurity best practices for all organizations, prioritizing asset hygiene to reduce breach risks.
REACH
Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (REACH)
Key Features
- Shifts chemical risk responsibility to industry
- Requires registration above 1 tonne per year
- Authorises SVHCs via substitution-driven permissions
- Imposes EU-wide restrictions on unacceptable risks
- Mandates supply-chain SDS and SVHC communication
CIS Controls
CIS Critical Security Controls v8.1
Key Features
- 18 prioritized controls with 153 actionable safeguards
- Implementation Groups IG1-IG3 for scalable adoption
- Foundational asset and software inventory mandates
- Mappings to NIST CSF, ISO 27001, PCI DSS
- Free Benchmarks, Navigator, and assessment tools
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
REACH Details
What It Is
REACH (Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006) is a directly applicable EU regulation establishing a comprehensive framework for managing chemical risks. Its primary purpose is protecting human health and the environment through industry-led identification, assessment, and control of chemical substances, mixtures, and articles. It employs a responsibility-shift approach, requiring manufacturers and importers to generate and submit data.
Key Components
- Four pillars: Registration (>1 tonne/year dossiers), Evaluation (dossier/substance checks), Authorisation (SVHC permissions via Annex XIV), Restriction (bans/limits via Annex XVII).
- 17 technical annexes detailing data requirements, SDS rules, exemptions.
- Built on precautionary principles, tonnage-based scaling, and supply-chain communication.
- Compliance model: continuous obligations, no central certification, national enforcement.
Why Organizations Use It
Legal mandate for EU market access; avoids fines, seizures, market bans. Enhances risk management, supply-chain transparency, substitution innovation. Builds stakeholder trust, supports ESG, ensures competitiveness in chemicals-intensive sectors.
Implementation Overview
Phased: gap analysis, substance inventory, dossier preparation (IUCLID), SDS/comms setup, monitoring. Applies to manufacturers/importers/downstream users across industries, EU/EEA. Requires cross-functional teams, tools like REACH-IT; audit readiness via self-assessments.
CIS Controls Details
What It Is
CIS Critical Security Controls v8.1 is a community-driven, prioritized cybersecurity framework from the Center for Internet Security. It offers prescriptive best practices via 18 controls and 153 safeguards to mitigate common attacks, emphasizing asset management, governance, and hybrid/cloud resilience using a risk-based, phased approach.
Key Components
- 18 Controls spanning hygiene (1-6), organizational (7-16), advanced (17-18)
- **Implementation Groups (IG1-IG3)56 essential safeguards (IG1), scaling to full suite
- Derived from attack data; maps to NIST CSF, ISO 27001, PCI DSS
- No certification; self-assessment with Navigator tool
Why Organizations Use It
- Reduces breach risk by 85%, cuts recovery time
- Eases multi-framework compliance, lowers insurance costs
- Boosts efficiency, vendor trust, market differentiation
Implementation Overview
- Phased roadmap: IG1 foundations (3-9 months), expand IG2/3 (6-18 months)
- Asset inventory, automation, training key activities
- All sizes/industries globally; no mandatory audits
Key Differences
| Aspect | REACH | CIS Controls |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Chemicals registration, evaluation, authorisation, restriction | Cybersecurity asset inventory, access, vulnerability management |
| Industry | Chemicals, manufacturing, importers EU-wide | All industries worldwide, any digital assets |
| Nature | Mandatory EU regulation, legally binding | Voluntary cybersecurity framework, best practices |
| Testing | Dossier evaluation by ECHA, substance checks | Penetration testing, vulnerability scans, self-assessments |
| Penalties | National fines, product seizures, market bans | No legal penalties, reputational/operational risks |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about REACH and CIS Controls
REACH FAQ
CIS Controls FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...
The Panoramic View: How Integrated Compliance Monitoring Creates Unprecedented Organizational Visibility and Adaptability
Gain unprecedented organizational visibility with integrated compliance monitoring. Automate real-time alerts, ensure GDPR & SOC 2 adherence, reduce risks, and
The DORA 'Hot Seat' Blueprint: Preparing Leadership and the Management Body for Regulatory Interviews
Prepare your Board & Management Body for DORA audits. Master the human element: demonstrate active oversight & accountability in regulatory interviews. Get the
ISO 27701 Implementation Roadmap: Extending Your ISMS to PIMS in 12 Months or Less
Extend ISO 27001 ISMS to ISO 27701 PIMS in 12 months with our phased roadmap. Templates, checklists & infographics for RoPA, DSARs & audit-ready privacy complia
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
ISO 26000 vs MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)
Discover ISO 26000 vs MLPS 2.0: Compare global SR guidance with China's cybersecurity scheme. Unlock compliance strategies, key differences & implementation tips for success. Align today!
Six Sigma vs BREEAM
Compare Six Sigma vs BREEAM: Data-driven DMAIC excellence meets sustainable building certification. Explore belts, eco-ratings & key diffs for peak performance. Discover now!
AEO vs PRINCE2
Compare AEO vs PRINCE2: Explore customs compliance & supply chain security (AEO) against structured project governance (PRINCE2). Unlock ROI insights, certification strategies & tailored implementation for efficiency.