What is the primary objective of **SOC 2**?

**The primary objective of SOC 2 is to provide independent attestation that a service organization's controls meet the Trust Services Criteria (TSC) for security, availability, processing integrity, confidentiality, and privacy.** Developed by the AICPA, SOC 2 evaluates systems handling customer data, with Security (CC1-CC9) as the mandatory common criteria. Type 2 reports assess design and operating effectiveness over 3-12 months, delivering assurance to stakeholders like enterprise clients.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **SOC 2**?

**No organization is legally required to comply with SOC 2, as it is a voluntary AICPA framework, but service organizations are professionally compelled by enterprise customer demands.** It targets SaaS, cloud, fintech, and data processors of any size storing, processing, or transmitting customer data. Enterprises mandate Type 2 reports in RFPs and MSAs, disqualifying non-compliant vendors and extending sales cycles by 3-6 months.

Does **SOC 2** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**Yes, SOC 2 requires an external audit by an independent AICPA-accredited CPA firm to issue Type 1 or Type 2 attestation reports.** Type 1 validates control design at a point in time; Type 2 tests operating effectiveness over a minimum 3-month period via sampling, walkthroughs, and evidence review. No formal certification exists—reports provide the assurance.

How often should an assessment for **SOC 2** be performed?

**SOC 2 Type 2 assessments should be performed annually to capture a full 12-month control period, with bridge letters extending validity up to 3 months.** This ensures continuous evidence of operating effectiveness, including quarterly access reviews and annual penetration tests. Type 1 can bridge gaps but is insufficient for enterprise needs.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **SOC 2**?

**Non-compliance with SOC 2 results in lost enterprise deals, as 70-80% of SaaS contracts require Type 2 reports, inflating CAC by 20-50% and extending sales cycles.** Absent controls heighten breach liability under laws like CCPA, with damages over $1M per incident, reputational damage, and investor scrutiny during funding or M&A.

An **SOC 2** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, SOC 2 maps effectively to frameworks like ISO 27001 (80% control overlap), NIST CSF, and others via AICPA spreadsheets.** Common Criteria (CC1-CC9) align with ISO Annex A domains, enabling reuse of controls like IAM (CC6) and risk assessment (CC3) to streamline multi-framework compliance without dual audits.

What is the first step to begin implementing **SOC 2**?

**The first step to implement SOC 2 is a scoping exercise to define in-scope systems, data flows, and Trust Services Criteria, starting with mandatory Security (CC1-CC9).** Engage a CPA for readiness assessment, inventory assets, and map gaps against TSC using tools like Vanta, producing a prioritized remediation plan of 50-100 controls.

What is the primary objective of **APRA CPS 234**?

**APRA CPS 234 requires regulated entities to maintain an information security capability commensurate with vulnerabilities and threats to information assets.** This minimises the likelihood and impact of incidents on confidentiality, integrity, or availability (CIA) of information assets, including those managed by related parties or third parties (paragraphs 1, 15-16). Effective from 1 July 2019, it ensures continued sound operation by linking security to prudential outcomes for depositors, policyholders, and customers.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **APRA CPS 234**?

**APRA CPS 234 applies to all APRA-regulated entities, including authorised deposit-taking institutions (ADIs), general insurers, life companies, private health insurers, and RSE licensees.** It covers authorised non-operating holding companies (NOHCs) and, for Heads of groups, extends group-wide including non-regulated entities (paragraphs 2-4). Foreign ADIs, Category C insurers, and eligible foreign life insurance companies (EFLICs) comply for Australian branch operations only (paragraph 3).

Does **APRA CPS 234** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**APRA CPS 234 does not mandate external audits or third-party certifications.** It requires internal audit to review design and operating effectiveness of information security controls, including those of related parties and third parties, using appropriately skilled personnel (paragraphs 32-34). Entities may rely on third-party assurance if internal audit assesses its sufficiency for material-impact assets (paragraph 34); systematic testing must be by functionally independent specialists (paragraph 30).

How often should an assessment for **APRA CPS 234** be performed?

**APRA CPS 234 requires review of the systematic testing program at least annually or upon material change to information assets or the business environment.** Testing frequency and nature must be commensurate with vulnerability/threat change rate, asset criticality/sensitivity, incident consequences, untrusted environment exposure, and asset changes (paragraphs 27, 31). Internal audit provides ongoing assurance; incident response plans require annual review and testing (paragraph 26).

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **APRA CPS 234**?

**Non-compliance with APRA CPS 234 exposes entities to APRA's prudential powers, including directions, remediation requirements, and heightened supervision.** APRA may adjust or exclude requirements in writing (paragraphs 9, 11). Breaches trigger supervisory actions under enabling Acts (e.g., Banking Act 1959), potentially including enforcement notices, increased scrutiny, and impacts on licensing or operations due to failure to maintain sound operation.

An **APRA CPS 234** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, APRA CPS 234 can be mapped to international frameworks as it is outcomes-based, requiring commensurate controls rather than prescriptive technical measures.** Common mappings include ISO 27001 for governance and controls, and NIST Cybersecurity Framework for Identify-Protect-Detect-Respond-Recover functions. This supports operationalisation while meeting CPS 234's board accountability, testing, and notification requirements (paragraphs 13, 27-36).

What is the first step to begin implementing **APRA CPS 234**?

**The first step for implementing APRA CPS 234 is for the Board to assume ultimate responsibility and ensure defined roles and responsibilities for information security.** Per paragraph 13, the Board must oversee a capability commensurate with threats, enabling sound operation; paragraph 14 requires documenting accountabilities for Board, senior management, and others (paragraphs 13-14). This establishes governance before asset classification and controls.

SOC 2 vs APRA CPS 234

Standards Comparison

SOC 2

Voluntary

2010

AICPA framework for service organizations' security controls

APRA CPS 234

Mandatory

2019

Australian prudential standard for information security resilience

Quick Verdict

SOC 2 offers voluntary trust assurance for global service providers via TSC audits, while APRA CPS 234 mandates information security governance for Australian financial entities with strict Board accountability and 72-hour incident reporting. Companies adopt SOC 2 for market access; CPS 234 avoids regulatory penalties.

Cybersecurity / Trust

SOC 2

System and Organization Controls 2

Cost

€€€€

Complexity

High

Implementation Time

6-12 months

Key Features

Type 2 reports validate operating effectiveness over time
Trust Services Criteria with mandatory Security foundation
Flexible scoping for systems and third-party vendors
Independent CPA attestation accelerates enterprise due diligence
Overlaps 80% with ISO 27001 and HIPAA controls

Information Security

APRA CPS 234

APRA Prudential Standard CPS 234 Information Security

Cost

€€€€

Complexity

High

Implementation Time

12-18 months

Key Features

Board ultimate responsibility for information security
Extends to all third-party managed assets
72-hour APRA notification for material incidents
Risk-based asset classification by criticality
Systematic independent control testing program

Detailed Analysis

A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

SOC 2 Details

What It Is

SOC 2 (System and Organization Controls 2) is a voluntary audit framework from the AICPA evaluating service organizations' commitments to Trust Services Criteria (TSC)—security, availability, processing integrity, confidentiality, and privacy. It provides independent assurance on controls handling customer data via risk-based assessments, with Type 1 (design) and Type 2 (operating effectiveness over 3-12 months) reports.

Key Components

**Five TSCSecurity (mandatory, CC1-CC9 common criteria), plus optional Availability (A1), Confidentiality (C1), Processing Integrity (PI1), Privacy (P1-P11).
Typically 50-100 controls mapped to TSC.
Built on COSO principles for control environments.
CPA-attested certification model, annual recertification.

Why Organizations Use It

Market-driven for SaaS/cloud providers to win enterprise deals.
Reduces sales friction, answers 80-90% of security questionnaires.
Mitigates breach risks, enhances resilience (99.99% uptime).
Builds stakeholder trust, signals maturity to investors.
Overlaps ISO 27001/HIPAA for multi-framework efficiency.

Implementation Overview

Phased approach: gap analysis (2-4 weeks), control deployment (4-8 weeks), 3-6 month monitoring, CPA audit. Targets data-handling service orgs (startups to enterprises), any geography. Automation tools like Vanta streamline evidence.

APRA CPS 234 Details

What It Is

APRA Prudential Standard CPS 234 (Information Security) is a mandatory regulation for APRA-regulated financial institutions in Australia, effective 1 July 2019. It requires entities to maintain information security capabilities commensurate with threats and vulnerabilities, minimizing impacts on confidentiality, integrity, and availability (CIA) of information assets, including those managed by third parties. It employs a risk-based, assurance-driven approach with board accountability.

Key Components

Board ultimate responsibility and defined roles (paras 13-14)
Asset classification by criticality/sensitivity (para 20)
Lifecycle controls, testing, and internal audit assurance (paras 15-34)
Incident response plans with annual testing (paras 23-26)
APRA notifications: 72 hours for material incidents, 10 business days for weaknesses (paras 35-36) No fixed controls; focuses on commensurate effectiveness.

Why Organizations Use It

Mandatory for ADIs, insurers, super funds to avoid penalties
Enhances cyber resilience, protects customers/depositors
Manages third-party risks, ensures operational continuity
Builds regulatory trust, aligns with NIST/ISO frameworks

Implementation Overview

Phased: gap analysis, policy framework, asset inventory, controls/testing, third-party assessments. Applies cross-sector, all sizes; ongoing APRA supervision. Typically 12-18 months initial, with continuous maintenance.

Key Differences

Aspect	SOC 2	APRA CPS 234
Scope	Trust Services Criteria: security, availability, confidentiality, etc.	Information security governance, controls, third-party risk for financial entities
Industry	Service organizations (SaaS, cloud) globally, all sizes	Australian financial services (banks, insurers) only
Nature	Voluntary AICPA audit framework	Mandatory prudential regulation with enforcement
Testing	Type 2 audits over 3-12 months by CPA firms	Systematic, independent testing annually, internal audit
Penalties	Loss of attestation, market exclusion, no fines	Regulatory sanctions, fines, license restrictions

Scope

SOC 2

Trust Services Criteria: security, availability, confidentiality, etc.

APRA CPS 234

Information security governance, controls, third-party risk for financial entities

Industry

SOC 2

Service organizations (SaaS, cloud) globally, all sizes

APRA CPS 234

Australian financial services (banks, insurers) only

Nature

SOC 2

Voluntary AICPA audit framework

APRA CPS 234

Mandatory prudential regulation with enforcement

Testing

SOC 2

Type 2 audits over 3-12 months by CPA firms

APRA CPS 234

Systematic, independent testing annually, internal audit

Penalties

SOC 2

Loss of attestation, market exclusion, no fines

APRA CPS 234

Regulatory sanctions, fines, license restrictions

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about SOC 2 and APRA CPS 234

SOC 2 FAQ

APRA CPS 234 FAQ

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

SOC 2 Audit Survival Guide: Auditor Questions, Red Flags, and Evidence Prep for First-Time Pass

Ace your SOC 2 audit with predicted auditor questions, model answers, red flags, and evidence checklists from CPA best practices & SignWell's journey. Reduce st

The Panoramic View: How Integrated Compliance Monitoring Creates Unprecedented Organizational Visibility and Adaptability

Gain unprecedented organizational visibility with integrated compliance monitoring. Automate real-time alerts, ensure GDPR & SOC 2 adherence, reduce risks, and

You Guide on how to Start Implementing NIS2 in Your Organization

Master NIS2 implementation with our detailed guide. Learn requirements, risk assessment, supply chain security, and compliance steps for your organization. Star

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

100+ Standards & Regulations

AI-Powered Insights

Collaborative Assessments

Actionable Recommendations

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

ISO 9001 vs HITRUST CSF

ISO 9001 vs HITRUST CSF: Compare QMS gold standard (1M+ certs) with certifiable cybersecurity framework. Key diffs, benefits & when to choose—boost compliance now!

C-TPAT vs ISO 22301

Compare C-TPAT vs ISO 22301: CBP's trusted trader security vs ISO's BCM resilience. Key diffs in criteria, validation, supply chain benefits. Secure operations—discover the best fit now!

ISA 95 vs ISO 26000

Compare ISA 95 vs ISO 26000: ISA-95 powers enterprise-MES integration; ISO 26000 guides social responsibility. Unlock differences, benefits & strategies for manufacturing leaders now!

SOC 2

APRA CPS 234

Quick Verdict

SOC 2

Key Features

APRA CPS 234

Key Features

Detailed Analysis

SOC 2 Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

APRA CPS 234 Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

Key Differences

Scope

Industry

Nature

Testing

Penalties

Frequently Asked Questions

SOC 2 FAQ

What is the primary objective of SOC 2?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with SOC 2?

Does SOC 2 require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for SOC 2 be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with SOC 2?

An SOC 2 be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing SOC 2?

APRA CPS 234 FAQ

What is the primary objective of APRA CPS 234?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with APRA CPS 234?

Does APRA CPS 234 require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for APRA CPS 234 be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with APRA CPS 234?

An APRA CPS 234 be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing APRA CPS 234?

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

SOC 2 Audit Survival Guide: Auditor Questions, Red Flags, and Evidence Prep for First-Time Pass

The Panoramic View: How Integrated Compliance Monitoring Creates Unprecedented Organizational Visibility and Adaptability

You Guide on how to Start Implementing NIS2 in Your Organization

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

ISO 9001 vs HITRUST CSF

C-TPAT vs ISO 22301

ISA 95 vs ISO 26000