TOGAF
Vendor-neutral framework for enterprise architecture governance
IFS Food
Global standard for food safety and quality compliance.
Quick Verdict
TOGAF provides enterprise architecture methodology for aligning business and IT globally, while IFS Food mandates food safety certification for manufacturers. Enterprises adopt TOGAF for strategic governance; food producers choose IFS for retailer compliance and market access.
TOGAF
TOGAF Standard, 10th Edition
Key Features
- Iterative ADM lifecycle for architecture development
- Content Metamodel ensuring traceable architecture entities
- Enterprise Continuum classifying reusable assets
- Reference Models like TRM and III-RM
- Architecture Capability Framework for governance
IFS Food
IFS Food Version 8
Key Features
- Product and Process Approach with audit trails
- Minimum 50% on-site production evaluation time
- Risk-based traceability tests on sampled products
- Food fraud and defense vulnerability assessments
- Knock-Out requirements for critical controls
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
TOGAF Details
What It Is
TOGAF Standard, 10th Edition is a vendor-neutral enterprise architecture framework by The Open Group. It provides a proven methodology for designing, planning, implementing, and governing enterprise-wide change. Primary scope spans business, data, application, and technology domains via an iterative approach centered on the Architecture Development Method (ADM).
Key Components
- **ADM phasesPreliminary, Vision, Business/Information Systems/Technology Architectures, Opportunities/Solutions, Migration Planning, Implementation Governance, Change Management.
- **Content FrameworkDeliverables, artifacts (catalogs/matrices/diagrams), building blocks.
- Enterprise Continuum, Reference Models (TRM, SIB, III-RM), Architecture Capability Framework.
- Certification via Open Group portfolio; no formal audits but maturity assessments.
Why Organizations Use It
Aligns strategy with IT for efficiency, reuse, risk reduction. Enables governance, avoids vendor lock-in, supports transformations. Builds stakeholder trust through traceability and compliance.
Implementation Overview
Phased tailoring of **ADMmaturity assessment, pilot roadmaps, scale governance. Suits large enterprises across industries; requires repository, training, Architecture Board.
IFS Food Details
What It Is
IFS Food Version 8 is a GFSI-benchmarked certification framework for food manufacturers, auditing product and process compliance to ensure safe, legal, authentic products meeting customer specs. It employs a risk-based Product and Process Approach (PPA) with on-site verification and traceability tests.
Key Components
- Organized into governance, HACCP/PRPs, operational controls, performance monitoring (Sections 1-5).
- 10 Knock-Out (KO) requirements (e.g., traceability, CCP monitoring, hygiene).
- Built on HACCP principles, with annual full audits.
- Scoring yields Higher Level (≥95%) or Foundation Level (≥75%) certification.
Why Organizations Use It
- Driven by European retailer mandates for private-label supply.
- Reduces audit duplication, builds stakeholder trust.
- Mitigates risks like food fraud/defense, recalls.
- Enhances efficiency, market access, resilience.
Implementation Overview
- Phased: gap analysis, FSMS design, training, validation, internal audits.
- Site-specific for processors globally; requires ISO 17065-accredited bodies.
- Involves continuous readiness for announced/unannounced audits.
Key Differences
| Aspect | TOGAF | IFS Food |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Enterprise architecture across business/IT domains | Food manufacturing processes and safety/quality |
| Industry | All industries, global enterprises | Food processing/manufacturing, mainly Europe |
| Nature | Voluntary methodology/framework | GFSI-benchmarked certification standard |
| Testing | Internal ADM iterations, maturity assessments | Annual on-site audits with product sampling |
| Penalties | No formal penalties, lost governance benefits | Certification denial/withdrawal, market access loss |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about TOGAF and IFS Food
TOGAF FAQ
IFS Food FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...
ISO 27701 Implementation Roadmap: Extending Your ISMS to PIMS in 12 Months or Less
Extend ISO 27001 ISMS to ISO 27701 PIMS in 12 months with our phased roadmap. Templates, checklists & infographics for RoPA, DSARs & audit-ready privacy complia
CIS Controls v8.1 for Cloud & Kubernetes: A Practical Implementation Playbook (AWS/Azure/GCP + IaC)
Translate CIS Controls v8.1 to cloud-native: Kubernetes patterns for IAM, logging, vuln mgmt, hardening on AWS, Azure, GCP + IaC. Practical playbook for teams.
You Guide on how to Start Implementing NIST CSF in Your Organization
Master NIST CSF implementation in your organization with this detailed guide. Learn core functions, key steps, best practices, and tips for cybersecurity succes
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
GDPR vs IATF 16949
Explore GDPR vs IATF 16949: EU data privacy law vs automotive quality standard. Uncover key differences, synergies, compliance tips for manufacturers. Boost efficiency now!
ISO 37301 vs ISO 19600
ISO 37301 vs ISO 19600: Certifiable CMS requirements replace guidance-only standard. Discover leadership, risk-based planning, whistleblowing & integration benefits. Upgrade now!
EPA vs ISA 95
Discover EPA vs ISA 95: Compare environmental regs (CAA, CWA, RCRA) with manufacturing integration standards. Master compliance, strategy & implementation for peak efficiency. Dive in!