Standards Comparison

    WEEE

    Mandatory
    2012

    EU Directive for managing waste electrical and electronic equipment

    VS

    FISMA

    Mandatory
    2014

    U.S. federal law for risk-based cybersecurity management.

    Quick Verdict

    WEEE mandates EU e-waste management for electronics firms via EPR and collection targets, while FISMA requires US federal agencies to secure info systems through NIST RMF. Companies adopt WEEE for market access, FISMA for contracts and resilience.

    Waste Management

    WEEE

    Directive 2012/19/EU on waste electrical and electronic equipment

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    Medium
    Implementation Time
    12-18 months

    Key Features

    • Mandates Extended Producer Responsibility for end-of-life management
    • Applies open scope to all electrical equipment since 2018
    • Sets 65% collection targets from EEE placed on market
    • Requires selective depollution of hazardous components per Annex II
    • Enforces national registration and harmonized annual reporting
    Cybersecurity

    FISMA

    Federal Information Security Modernization Act (FISMA)

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    Medium
    Implementation Time
    18-24 months

    Key Features

    • NIST RMF 7-step lifecycle process
    • Continuous monitoring and diagnostics requirements
    • Risk-based system categorization via FIPS 199
    • NIST SP 800-53 security control baselines
    • Annual OMB/IG oversight and reporting

    Detailed Analysis

    A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

    WEEE Details

    What It Is

    Directive 2012/19/EU, the recast WEEE Directive, is a binding EU regulation implementing Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) for Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment (WEEE). It applies open-scope coverage to all EEE since 2018, prioritizing waste prevention, preparation for reuse, recycling, recovery, and risk reduction from hazardous substances.

    Key approach: data-driven targets, national transposition with harmonized methodologies.

    Key Components

    • Producer obligations: registration, POM reporting, financing via PROs
    • Collection targets: 65% average EEE POM or 85% generated
    • Treatment: selective depollution (Annex II), storage (Annex III)
    • 6 categories (Annex III); crossed-out wheelie bin labeling
    • Enforcement via national registers, Eurostat monitoring

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Mandatory for EU market access, avoids penalties/market bans
    • Recovers critical raw materials, supports Green Deal
    • Manages illegal export risks, enhances circular economy
    • Builds trust, provides competitive sustainability edge

    Implementation Overview

    Phased: gap analysis, multi-country registration/PRO joining, data integration, reverse logistics setup. Applies to producers/importers EU-wide; audits national. High complexity for multinationals.

    FISMA Details

    What It Is

    Federal Information Security Modernization Act (FISMA) is a U.S. federal law (2014) mandating risk-based information security programs for federal agencies and contractors. It establishes a comprehensive framework using NIST Risk Management Framework (RMF) to protect confidentiality, integrity, and availability of federal systems.

    Key Components

    • **7-step RMFPrepare, Categorize (FIPS 199), Select/Implement/Assess (NIST SP 800-53 controls, 20 families, ~1,000+ requirements), Authorize (ATO), Monitor.
    • Continuous diagnostics via CDM; annual IG maturity assessments (Levels 1-5).
    • Oversight by OMB, DHS/CISA; incident reporting.

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Mandatory for federal entities/contractors handling federal data; avoids penalties, debarment.
    • Enhances resilience, reduces breach risks/costs; enables market access.
    • Builds trust, aligns with FedRAMP; strategic efficiency via automation.

    Implementation Overview

    • Phased: governance/inventory, gap analysis, control deployment, continuous monitoring.
    • Applies to agencies/contractors all sizes/industries; resource-heavy for complex environments.
    • No central certification; requires ATOs, IG audits, POA&Ms. (178 words)

    Key Differences

    Scope

    WEEE
    EEE waste management, collection, recycling
    FISMA
    Federal info systems security, risk management

    Industry

    WEEE
    Electronics producers, EU-wide
    FISMA
    US federal agencies, contractors

    Nature

    WEEE
    Binding EU directive, national enforcement
    FISMA
    US federal law, NIST standards

    Testing

    WEEE
    Reporting, audits by national authorities
    FISMA
    Continuous monitoring, IG assessments

    Penalties

    WEEE
    National fines, market restrictions
    FISMA
    Contract loss, debarment, oversight

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Common questions about WEEE and FISMA

    WEEE FAQ

    FISMA FAQ

    You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

    Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

    Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

    Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

    100+ Standards & Regulations
    AI-Powered Insights
    Collaborative Assessments
    Actionable Recommendations

    Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages