WELL
Certification standard for building occupant health and well-being
ISO 19600
International guidelines for compliance management systems
Quick Verdict
WELL certifies buildings for occupant health via performance testing, while ISO 19600 provides CMS guidelines for managing compliance risks. Companies adopt WELL for ESG/tenant appeal; ISO 19600 for governance frameworks.
WELL
WELL Building Standard v2
Key Features
- Mandatory on-site performance verification testing
- 24 preconditions and 102 point-based optimizations
- 10 core concepts like Air, Water, Mind
- Certification tiers from Bronze to Platinum
- Continuous monitoring pathways for compliance
ISO 19600
ISO 19600:2014 Compliance management systems — Guidelines
Key Features
- Risk-based CMS framework with PDCA cycle
- Principles of good governance and proportionality
- Annex SL structure for ISO integration
- Scalable guidelines for all organization sizes
- Compliance obligations and continual improvement focus
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
WELL Details
What It Is
WELL Building Standard v2 is a performance-based certification framework administered by the International WELL Building Institute (IWBI). It focuses on designing, operating, and verifying buildings to advance human health and well-being through evidence-based strategies. Its people-first approach emphasizes measurable indoor environmental quality and organizational policies across **10 core conceptsAir, Water, Nourishment, Light, Movement, Thermal Comfort, Sound, Materials, Mind, and Community.
Key Components
- 24 mandatory Preconditions and 102 optional Optimizations for scoring.
- Innovation category for novel strategies.
- Certification via documentation review and on-site performance verification.
- Tiers: Bronze (40 points), Silver (50), Gold (60), Platinum (80) with concept minimums.
Why Organizations Use It
Drives occupant health, productivity, and ESG reporting. Enhances tenant retention, rent premiums, and risk mitigation. Complements LEED for holistic sustainability. Builds stakeholder trust through verified outcomes.
Implementation Overview
Phased: gap analysis, scorecard development, design integration, verification testing, operations. Applies to new/existing buildings, all sizes/industries globally. Requires cross-functional teams, WELL APs, and recertification every 3 years.
ISO 19600 Details
What It Is
ISO 19600:2014, officially Compliance management systems — Guidelines, is a Type B guidance standard from the International Organization for Standardization. It provides recommendations for establishing, implementing, evaluating, maintaining, and improving a Compliance Management System (CMS). Applicable to all organizations, it adopts a risk-based approach with a PDCA (Plan-Do-Check-Act) cycle and Annex SL structure.
Key Components
- **10 clausesContext, leadership, planning, support, operation, performance evaluation, improvement.
- Core principles: good governance, proportionality, transparency, sustainability.
- Focus: compliance obligations identification, risk assessment, controls, training, monitoring.
- Non-certifiable benchmarking tool, predecessor to ISO 37301.
Why Organizations Use It
- Mitigates legal, regulatory, reputational risks; enables strategic decision-making.
- Enhances operational efficiency, market access, culture of integrity.
- Builds stakeholder trust, supports ESG, future-proofs for certification.
Implementation Overview
- **Phased roadmapLeadership commitment, gap analysis, design, rollout, continuous improvement.
- Scalable for SMEs to multinationals, all sectors/geographies.
- Involves policy development, risk registers, training, audits; no formal certification.
Key Differences
| Aspect | WELL | ISO 19600 |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Occupant health/well-being in buildings (10 concepts) | Compliance management systems (obligations, risks) |
| Industry | Real estate, offices, all building types globally | All industries/organizations worldwide |
| Nature | Voluntary performance certification standard | Non-certifiable guidelines (withdrawn, replaced) |
| Testing | Mandatory on-site performance verification/testing | Internal audits, management reviews, monitoring |
| Penalties | Certification denial/revocation, no legal fines | No direct penalties (guidance only) |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about WELL and ISO 19600
WELL FAQ
ISO 19600 FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

Top 10 SOC 2 Audit Pitfalls and Fixes: Real Auditor Red Flags from Type 2 Fieldwork with Evidence Checklists
Discover 10 common SOC 2 Type 2 audit pitfalls like evidence gaps, scope creep, vendor oversights. Get Fail/Pass visuals, client stories, checklists for 95% fir

Scaling Compliance: How Modern Tools Transform Lean Teams into Regulatory Powerhouses
Discover how compliance monitoring tools empower lean teams to automate real-time checks, ensure GDPR/HIPAA/SOC 2 compliance, and scale oversight efficiently. T

Unpacking the True Cost: A Guide to Calculating TCO for Modern Compliance Monitoring Software
Unpack the true Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) for compliance monitoring software. Factor in licenses, implementation, training, maintenance, and ROI savings for
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
PCI DSS vs SOX
Confused by PCI DSS vs SOX? Uncover key differences in payment security & financial controls. Align frameworks for streamlined compliance, risk reduction & audit success now.
GDPR vs IFS Food
Compare GDPR vs IFS Food: Master data privacy & food safety compliance for EU manufacturers. Uncover key differences, overlaps & strategies to dodge fines. Achieve seamless adherence now!
NIST CSF vs ISO 13485
NIST CSF vs ISO 13485: Flexible cyber risk framework meets med device QMS rigor. Compare governance, functions & clauses for compliance wins. Secure your path now!