WELL vs ISO 22301
WELL
Certification standard for occupant health in buildings
ISO 22301
International standard for business continuity management systems
Quick Verdict
WELL certifies buildings for occupant health via 10 concepts and on-site testing, while ISO 22301 builds BCMS resilience against disruptions through BIA and audits. Companies adopt WELL for wellness differentiation and ISO 22301 for operational continuity and risk mitigation.
WELL
WELL Building Standard v2
ISO 22301
ISO 22301:2019 Business continuity management systems
Key Features
- PDCA cycle for continual BCMS improvement
- Business Impact Analysis (BIA) for prioritization
- Risk assessment and recovery strategies
- Leadership commitment and policy mandates
- Operational testing and exercise requirements
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
WELL Details
What It Is
WELL Building Standard v2 is a performance-based certification framework administered by the International WELL Building Institute (IWBI). It focuses on designing, operating, and verifying buildings to advance human health and well-being. Scope covers new/existing buildings across types like offices, residential, hospitality. Key approach: evidence-based, blending preconditions (mandatory pass/fail) and optimizations (points for extras).
Key Components
- **10 core conceptsAir, Water, Nourishment, Light, Movement, Thermal Comfort, Sound, Materials, Mind, Community (plus Innovation).
- 24 Preconditions, 102 Optimizations totaling up to 110 points.
- Built on public health/building science research.
- Certification model: tiers (Bronze 40pts, Silver 50, Gold 60, Platinum 80) with concept minimums.
Why Organizations Use It
Drives occupant health, productivity, ESG reporting; complements LEED. Mitigates risks like sick building syndrome. Boosts rents (up to 7.7%), retention, reputation via verified outcomes.
Implementation Overview
Phased: gap analysis, scorecard, documentation, on-site verification, recertification every 3 years. Cross-functional teams; applies globally to all sizes. Requires third-party testing, continuous monitoring optional.
ISO 22301 Details
What It Is
ISO 22301:2019 is the international standard specifying requirements for a Business Continuity Management System (BCMS). It provides a flexible, high-level framework using the PDCA (Plan-Do-Check-Act) cycle and risk-based approach to build organizational resilience against disruptions like cyberattacks, pandemics, and natural disasters.
Key Components
- 10 clauses (4-10 core): context of organization, leadership, planning (BIA, risk assessment), support, operation, performance evaluation, improvement.
- Built on Annex SL for integration with standards like ISO 27001.
- Certification: 3-year cycle with annual surveillance audits via accredited bodies.
Why Organizations Use It
- Minimizes downtime, financial losses, and reputational damage.
- Ensures compliance with regulations (e.g., NIS Directive).
- Enhances risk management and stakeholder trust.
- Delivers competitive edges like procurement advantages and lower insurance premiums.
Implementation Overview
- Phased approach: gap analysis, BIA, training, testing, audits.
- Suits all sizes/sectors globally; 60-day plans possible with tools.
- Two-stage certification (6-8 weeks readiness/effectiveness review).
Key Differences
| Aspect | WELL | ISO 22301 |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Occupant health, 10 concepts (Air, Water, etc.) | Business continuity, BCMS against disruptions |
| Industry | All buildings, global, all sizes | All sectors, global, all sizes |
| Nature | Voluntary performance certification | Voluntary BCMS certification standard |
| Testing | On-site performance verification, annual reporting | Internal audits, exercises, 3-year certification |
| Penalties | Loss of certification, no legal penalties | Loss of certification, no legal penalties |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about WELL and ISO 22301
WELL FAQ
ISO 22301 FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

Breaking Down NIST CSF 2.0 Structure: Core, Tiers, Profiles, and Real-World Application
Master NIST CSF 2.0 structure: Govern + 5 Core functions, Tiers (Partial-Adaptive), Profiles for gaps, and real-world apps. Build effective cyber risk strategie

The NIS2 "FTE Trap": Why 5 Analysts for 24/7 Security is Actually 8 (and Why the Board Needs to Know)
Exposed: NIS2 FTE Trap math shows 5 analysts fail 24/7 coverage due to sickness, training, leave & 2026 churn. Line-by-line breakdown for compliance. Alert your

SOC 2 Trust Services Criteria in Plain English: Side-by-Side Decoder for Security, Availability, and Beyond
Decode AICPA Trust Services Criteria from auditor jargon to plain English with side-by-side tables, analogies & TL;DRs. CISOs & founders: implement SOC 2 contro
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Explore More Comparisons
See how WELL and ISO 22301 compare against other standards