GRADUM
    FeaturesMaturity ModelsFor CreatorsPricingBlogCompareSupport
    DashboardSign Up Free
    Blog/Compare/WELL vs MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)
    Standards Comparison

    WELL vs MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)

    WELL

    Voluntary
    2014

    Certification for occupant health in built environments

    VS

    MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)

    Mandatory
    N/A

    China's regulation for graded cybersecurity protection of networks

    Quick Verdict

    WELL certifies healthy buildings globally via performance testing for occupant well-being; MLPS 2.0 mandates cybersecurity grading in China with audits and fines. Companies adopt WELL for ESG/branding, MLPS for legal compliance.

    Building Health & Wellness

    WELL

    WELL Building Standard v2

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    12-18 months

    Key Features

    • Mandatory on-site performance verification testing
    • 10 core concepts with preconditions and optimizations
    • People-first focus on occupant health outcomes
    • Tiered certification Bronze to Platinum via points
    • Continuous monitoring pathways for compliance
    Standard

    MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)

    Multi-Level Protection Scheme 2.0

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    Medium
    Implementation Time
    12-18 months

    Key Features

    • Five impact-based protection levels for systems
    • Mandatory PSB registration and approval Level 2+
    • Technical controls for cloud, IoT, big data, ICS
    • Law enforcement oversight by Public Security Bureaus
    • Periodic third-party audits scoring 70/100 minimum

    Detailed Analysis

    A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

    WELL Details

    What It Is

    WELL Building Standard v2 is a performance-based certification framework administered by the International WELL Building Institute (IWBI). It focuses on designing, operating, and verifying buildings to advance human health and well-being through evidence-based strategies. Its concept-based approach organizes requirements into 10 core areas like Air, Water, and Mind, using mandatory Preconditions and optional Optimizations.

    Key Components

    • **10 conceptsAir, Water, Nourishment, Light, Movement, Thermal Comfort, Sound, Materials, Mind, Community (plus Innovation).
    • 24 Preconditions (pass/fail) and 102 Optimizations (points-earning).
    • Built on public health research; certification via tiers (Bronze 40 points to Platinum 80 points) with concept minimums.

    Why Organizations Use It

    Drives occupant productivity, reduces absenteeism, enhances ESG reporting, and boosts rents/asset value. Voluntary but complements LEED for dual benefits; manages health risks via verified IEQ.

    Implementation Overview

    Phased: gap analysis, scorecard, documentation, on-site verification, recertification every 3 years. Applies to new/existing buildings, all sizes/industries; requires third-party testing.

    MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme) Details

    What It Is

    MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme 2.0) is China's mandatory regulatory framework for graded cybersecurity protection of information systems and networks. Enforced under the 2017 Cybersecurity Law (Article 21), it requires classification into five levels based on potential harm to national security, social order, and public interests using an impact-based risk methodology.

    Key Components

    • Core domains: physical security, network protection, data security, access control, monitoring, governance.
    • Standards: GB/T 22239-2019 (baseline), GB/T 25070-2019 (technical), GB/T 28448-2019 (evaluation).
    • Built on common controls plus level-specific and technology extensions (cloud, IoT, ICS).
    • Compliance model: self-classification, third-party audits (Level 2+), PSB approval, periodic re-evaluations.

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Legal mandate for all China network operators; non-compliance risks fines, suspensions.
    • Enhances resilience, aligns with data laws (DSL, PIPL).
    • Builds regulator trust, enables market access, reduces breach risks.

    Implementation Overview

    Phased: scoping, classification, gap analysis, remediation, audits, ongoing monitoring. Applies to all sizes in China; Level 2+ needs licensed audits. (178 words)

    Key Differences

    AspectWELLMLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)
    ScopeOccupant health, 10 concepts (air, water, mind)Cybersecurity, 5 levels for networks/systems
    IndustryAll buildings globally (offices, residential)All network operators in China
    NatureVoluntary certification, performance-basedMandatory regulation, law enforcement
    TestingOn-site performance verification, 3-year recertThird-party audits, annual for Level 3+
    PenaltiesLoss of certification, no legal finesFines, operational suspension, inspections

    Scope

    WELL
    Occupant health, 10 concepts (air, water, mind)
    MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)
    Cybersecurity, 5 levels for networks/systems

    Industry

    WELL
    All buildings globally (offices, residential)
    MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)
    All network operators in China

    Nature

    WELL
    Voluntary certification, performance-based
    MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)
    Mandatory regulation, law enforcement

    Testing

    WELL
    On-site performance verification, 3-year recert
    MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)
    Third-party audits, annual for Level 3+

    Penalties

    WELL
    Loss of certification, no legal fines
    MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)
    Fines, operational suspension, inspections

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Common questions about WELL and MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)

    WELL FAQ

    MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme) FAQ

    You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

    Real-World ISO 27701 Success: Synthesized Case Studies, Metrics, and Lessons for Privacy Resilience

    Real-World ISO 27701 Success: Synthesized Case Studies, Metrics, and Lessons for Privacy Resilience

    Real-world ISO 27701 success from Tribeca, Kocho: DSAR efficiency gains, risk score reductions, certification ROI. Synthesized metrics prove privacy resilience

    From SOC to AI-Native CDC: Redefining Triage and Response in 2026

    From SOC to AI-Native CDC: Redefining Triage and Response in 2026

    Explore the shift from SOCs to AI-Native CDCs. Autonomous agents handle Tier 1 triage in 2026, empowering analysts for complex threats. Discover the future of c

    2026 GDPR Data Processing Blueprint: Implementing Consent Management in Semrush and Ahrefs Workflows

    2026 GDPR Data Processing Blueprint: Implementing Consent Management in Semrush and Ahrefs Workflows

    Implement GDPR Articles 6 & 7 in Semrush and Ahrefs workflows with our 2026 blueprint. Get checklists for audit-proof keyword tracking, backlinks, and data resi

    Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

    Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

    Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

    100+ Standards & Regulations
    AI-Powered Insights
    Collaborative Assessments
    Actionable Recommendations

    Explore More Comparisons

    See how WELL and MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme) compare against other standards

    Other WELL Comparisons

    • WELL vs U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules
    • WELL vs ISO/IEC 42001:2023
    • ITIL vs WELL
    • AEO vs WELL
    • NIST CSF vs WELL

    Other MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme) Comparisons

    • MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme) vs U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules
    • ISO 31000 vs MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)
    • HIPAA vs MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)
    • MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme) vs ISO 28000
    • MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme) vs ISO 30301
    GRADUM

    Transform your assessment process with collaborative, AI-powered maturity evaluations that deliver actionable insights.

    Navigation

    FeaturesMaturity ModelsFor CreatorsPricing

    Legal

    Terms and ConditionsPrivacy PolicyImprintCopyright PolicyCookie Policy

    © 2026 Gradum. All Rights Reserved