What is the primary objective of BRC?

The primary objective of BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety is to ensure manufacturers produce safe, legal, and authentic food products meeting customer quality requirements through a structured management system. It combines senior management commitment with a Codex HACCP-based food safety plan and prerequisite programs (GMP/GHP) to control contamination, mislabelling, fraud, and operational risks. Issue 9 emphasizes environmental monitoring, food defence, and labelling controls to address recall drivers.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with BRC?

BRC compliance is professionally required for food manufacturers, processors, and packers supplying major retailers, as it is a GFSI-benchmarked standard mandated by many global buyers. It targets sites producing processed foods, ingredients, primary products like fruit/vegetables, and domestic pet foods under direct management control. Retailers like Tesco and Walmart require certification for supply chain access; non-compliance risks contract loss.

Does BRC require an external audit or third-party certification?

Yes, BRC requires mandatory external audits by accredited certification bodies, leading to third-party certification valid for one year. Audits are announced or unannounced, covering nine Issue 9 clauses with grading (AA/A/B/C/D, "+" for unannounced). Fundamental requirements like HACCP and internal audits must be met; critical non-conformities prevent certification.

How often should an assessment for BRC be performed?

BRC requires annual external certification audits with internal audits at least four times yearly across all clauses. Internal audits must cover full scope annually, with risk-based frequency; seasonal sites audit pre-startup. Management reviews occur annually, objectives reported quarterly, and non-conformities closed via root cause analysis before recertification.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with BRC?

Non-compliance with BRC results in audit grading downgrade, certification suspension/denial, or withdrawal, blocking retailer supply chains. Major non-conformities in fundamentals (e.g., HACCP, traceability) require full re-audit; critical issues trigger immediate action. Commercial impacts include delisting, lost revenue, and heightened recall risks from failures in allergens, pathogens, or labelling.

Can BRC be mapped to other international frameworks?

Yes, BRC maps effectively to GFSI-benchmarked frameworks, providing a strong foundation for regulatory alignment like US FSMA Preventive Controls. Issue 9's HACCP, PRPs, and governance exceed many FSMA elements, though PCQI designation and preventive control terminology need adaptation. It harmonizes with schemes via shared audit protocols and continuous improvement.

What is the first step to begin implementing BRC?

The first step for BRC implementation is securing senior management commitment via a signed food safety policy and defining audit scope. Assemble a multidisciplinary team, conduct gap analysis against Issue 9 clauses using BRC tools, and prioritize fundamentals like HACCP development and site standards remediation.

What is the primary objective of ISO 27018?

ISO 27018 provides a code of practice for protecting personally identifiable information (PII) in public clouds acting as PII processors. It extends ISO 27001 and ISO 27002 with ~25–30 privacy-specific controls addressing cloud risks like multi-tenancy, subprocessors, consent, purpose limitation, data minimization, breach notification, and restrictions on secondary PII use (e.g., no marketing without consent). The 2019 edition aligns with ISO 27002:2013, emphasizing transparency, accountability, and PII lifecycle management from collection to deletion.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with ISO 27018?

ISO 27018 targets public cloud service providers (CSPs) acting as PII processors for customers. It applies to hyperscalers, regional platforms, and sector-specific clouds (e.g., health, finance) processing PII under contract, regardless of organization size. Controllers use it for vendor due diligence, but it excludes controller-specific obligations and private/on-premises environments.

Does ISO 27018 require an external audit or third-party certification?

No, ISO 27018 is not a standalone certifiable standard; controls are assessed during ISO 27001 audits by accredited bodies under ISO/IEC 17021 and 27006. Organizations include ISO 27018 controls in their Statement of Applicability (SoA); "certification" references validation within ISO 27001 scope, with certificates valid for three years supported by annual surveillance.

How often should an assessment for ISO 27018 be performed?

ISO 27018 assessments occur via annual surveillance audits and full recertification every three years as part of the ISO 27001 cycle. Internal risk assessments and gap analyses should be conducted continually, with updates to the SoA for changes in cloud services, subprocessors, or regulations.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with ISO 27018?

Non-compliance with ISO 27018 risks loss of customer trust, procurement delays, cyber insurance issues, and failure to meet processor obligations under laws like GDPR Article 28. As a code of practice, it carries no direct fines, but weak PII controls can lead to regulatory penalties, contract breaches, and reputational damage in cloud markets.

Can ISO 27018 be mapped to other international frameworks?

Yes, ISO 27018 maps closely to frameworks like ISO 27017 (cloud security), ISO 27701 (PIMS), ISO 29100 (privacy framework), and regulations such as GDPR Article 28. Controls align on transparency, subprocessors, data subject rights, and breach notification, enabling integrated ISMS implementations.

What is the first step to begin implementing ISO 27018?

Conduct a gap analysis of current ISMS against ISO 27018 controls, assuming an existing ISO 27001 foundation. Review policies, SoA, contracts, subprocessors, and PII lifecycle processes; prioritize transparency, DPAs, and breach procedures to build a remediation roadmap.

Standards Comparison

BRC vs ISO 27018

BRC

Voluntary

2022

Global standard for food safety in manufacturing

ISO 27018

Voluntary

2019

International code for PII protection in public clouds.

Quick Verdict

BRC ensures food safety certification for manufacturers via HACCP and audits, securing retailer access. ISO 27018 extends ISO 27001 for cloud providers protecting PII with privacy controls, building customer trust in data handling.

Food Safety

BRC

BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety

Cost

€€€€

Complexity

High

Implementation Time

6-12 months

Cloud Privacy

ISO 27018

ISO/IEC 27018:2019 PII protection in public clouds

Cost

€€€

Complexity

Medium

Implementation Time

6-12 months

Key Features

Privacy controls for PII in public cloud processors
Transparent subprocessor and location disclosure
Mandatory breach notification to customers
Prohibits PII use for marketing without consent
Supports data subject rights fulfillment

Detailed Analysis

A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

BRC Details

What It Is

BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety (Issue 9) is a GFSI-benchmarked certification framework for food manufacturers, processors, and packers. It ensures product safety, legality, authenticity, and quality through a structured management system combining senior leadership commitment and a Codex HACCP-based food safety plan supported by prerequisite programs.

Key Components

Nine core clauses: senior management, HACCP, FSQMS, site standards, product/process control, personnel, risk zones, traded products.
Fundamental requirements (e.g., traceability, allergen management, CAPA) are non-negotiable for certification.
Built on HACCP principles with risk assessments for hazards including fraud and malicious contamination.
Grading (AA/A/B/C/D) via announced/unannounced audits.

Why Organizations Use It

Provides market access to global retailers mandating GFSI certification, reduces duplicative audits, demonstrates due diligence, mitigates recall risks from allergens/pathogens/labelling. Builds trust, supports FSMA compliance, drives continuous improvement.

Implementation Overview

Phased approach: gap analysis, documentation, training, internal audits, certification audit. Applies to manufacturers worldwide; requires 6-12 months, CAPEX for site upgrades, annual audits. Suited for all sizes targeting retail supply chains.

ISO 27018 Details

What It Is

ISO/IEC 27018 is a code of practice extending ISO/IEC 27001/27002 for protecting PII in public clouds where CSPs act as processors. Revised in 2019, it employs a risk-based approach with cloud-specific privacy controls addressing multi-tenancy, subprocessors, and data flows.

Key Components

~25-30 privacy controls on consent, minimization, transparency, retention.
Built on 8 principles (consent, purpose limitation, accuracy, safeguards, accountability).
Integrated into ISO 27001 ISMS; audited as extension, no standalone cert.

Why Organizations Use It

Builds trust, speeds procurement via SoA.
Aligns with GDPR Art. 28, HIPAA processor duties.
Reduces risks, aids insurance, differentiates CSPs.

Implementation Overview

Gap analysis on ISMS, update SoA/contracts/policies.
Training, technical measures like encryption/logging.
All CSP sizes; third-party audit within 27001 cycle. (178 words)

Key Differences

Aspect	BRC	ISO 27018
Scope	Food safety manufacturing, processing, packing	PII protection in public cloud services
Industry	Food, packaging, storage, global manufacturers	Cloud service providers, all sectors processing PII
Nature	Voluntary GFSI-benchmarked certification standard	Code of practice extending ISO 27001 voluntarily
Testing	Annual announced/unannounced third-party audits	Integrated into ISO 27001 audits, annual surveillance
Penalties	Certification loss, market access denial, no fines	No direct penalties, potential contract/regulatory issues

Scope

BRC

Food safety manufacturing, processing, packing

ISO 27018

PII protection in public cloud services

Industry

BRC

Food, packaging, storage, global manufacturers

ISO 27018

Cloud service providers, all sectors processing PII

Nature

BRC

Voluntary GFSI-benchmarked certification standard

ISO 27018

Code of practice extending ISO 27001 voluntarily

Testing

BRC

Annual announced/unannounced third-party audits

ISO 27018

Integrated into ISO 27001 audits, annual surveillance

Penalties

BRC

Certification loss, market access denial, no fines

ISO 27018

No direct penalties, potential contract/regulatory issues

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about BRC and ISO 27018

BRC FAQ

ISO 27018 FAQ

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

One Step at a Time - a 6 Month Plan to Live and Breath DORA

Achieve DORA compliance in 6 months with our detailed plan. Learn implementation sequence, starting steps, pitfalls to avoid, and accelerators for success. Toug

NIST CSF 2.0 Plain English Decoder: Translating Govern, Supply Chain, and Core Functions from Jargon to Actionable Insights

Demystify NIST CSF 2.0 jargon with plain English tables for Govern, Supply Chain & Core Functions. Actionable steps for risk oversight & vendor management. Empo

PDPA Cross-Border Transfer Rules Decoded: Singapore, Thailand, and Taiwan Mechanisms Compared with Practical Implementation Templates

Decode PDPA cross-border transfers for Singapore, Thailand, Taiwan. Statutory excerpts, approved mechanisms, SCC templates. Harmonize with GDPR, navigate exempt

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

100+ Standards & Regulations

AI-Powered Insights

Collaborative Assessments

Actionable Recommendations

Explore More Comparisons

See how BRC and ISO 27018 compare against other standards

Other BRC Comparisons

Other ISO 27018 Comparisons

What It Is

Key Components

Nine core clauses: senior management, HACCP, FSQMS, site standards, product/process control, personnel, risk zones, traded products.

Fundamental requirements (e.g., traceability, allergen management, CAPA) are non-negotiable for certification.

Built on HACCP principles with risk assessments for hazards including fraud and malicious contamination.

Grading (AA/A/B/C/D) via announced/unannounced audits.

What It Is

Key Components

~25-30 privacy controls on consent, minimization, transparency, retention.
Built on 8 principles (consent, purpose limitation, accuracy, safeguards, accountability).
Integrated into ISO 27001 ISMS; audited as extension, no standalone cert.

Why Organizations Use It

Builds trust, speeds procurement via SoA.
Aligns with GDPR Art. 28, HIPAA processor duties.
Reduces risks, aids insurance, differentiates CSPs.

Implementation Overview

Gap analysis on ISMS, update SoA/contracts/policies.
Training, technical measures like encryption/logging.
All CSP sizes; third-party audit within 27001 cycle. (178 words)

Aspect

BRC

ISO 27018

Scope

Food safety manufacturing, processing, packing

PII protection in public cloud services

Industry

Food, packaging, storage, global manufacturers

Cloud service providers, all sectors processing PII

Nature

Voluntary GFSI-benchmarked certification standard

Code of practice extending ISO 27001 voluntarily

Testing

Annual announced/unannounced third-party audits

Integrated into ISO 27001 audits, annual surveillance

Penalties

Certification loss, market access denial, no fines

No direct penalties, potential contract/regulatory issues