What is the primary objective of **COBIT**?

**COBIT's primary objective is to help organizations create value from I&T, manage risk, and optimize resources through a tailored governance system.** COBIT 2019 defines 40 governance and management objectives across five domains—**EDM** (Evaluate, Direct, Monitor), **APO** (Align, Plan, Organize), **BAI** (Build, Acquire, Implement), **DSS** (Deliver, Service, Support), and **MEA** (Monitor, Evaluate, Assess)—translating stakeholder needs via the goals cascade into practices, components, and **CMMI-based performance management** (levels 0-5).

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **COBIT**?

**No organizations are legally required to comply with COBIT, as it is a voluntary framework maintained by ISACA.** Professionally, it applies to enterprises relying on I&T for value creation, particularly in regulated sectors like finance and utilities, where boards and executives use its **six governance system principles** and **11 design factors** (e.g., enterprise strategy, risk profile, compliance requirements) to demonstrate EGIT maturity to auditors and stakeholders.

Does **COBIT** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**COBIT does not require external audit or third-party certification.** It supports internal assurance via **MEA04 Managed Assurance** and capability assessments (0-5 levels), with ISACA offering individual certificates like **COBIT 2019 Foundation** and **Design & Implementation**; organizations demonstrate conformance through self-assessments, internal audits, and evidence aligned to the **core model of 40 objectives**.

How often should an assessment for **COBIT** be performed?

**COBIT assessments should be performed periodically based on organizational needs, typically annually or tied to capability improvement cycles.** The **CMMI-based performance management** in COBIT 2019 recommends regular reviews of process capabilities (levels 0-5), with **MEA** domain practices enabling ongoing monitoring via metrics and gap analyses, adjusted by **design factors** like threat landscape changes.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **COBIT**?

**Non-compliance with COBIT carries no direct legal penalties, as it is a non-regulatory framework.** Indirect consequences include increased enterprise risk, suboptimal I&T value delivery, audit findings in regulated environments, and failure to meet stakeholder expectations for EGIT, potentially leading to operational disruptions or weakened assurance under **EDM** and **MEA** objectives.

Can **COBIT** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, COBIT 2019 explicitly supports mapping to other international frameworks via its governance framework principles.** It includes **alignment** as a core principle, enabling integration of its 40 objectives and seven components (e.g., processes, organizational structures) with standards through published ISACA resources, design workflows, and the goals cascade for consistent EGIT.

What is the first step to begin implementing **COBIT**?

**The first step to implement COBIT is to evaluate enterprise context using design factors and conduct a current-state capability assessment.** Per the **COBIT 2019 Design Guide**, apply the **11 design factors** (e.g., strategy, risk profile) and **goals cascade** (13 enterprise goals, 13 alignment goals) to scope objectives, baseline performance (0-5 levels), and produce a tailored roadmap starting with high-priority processes like **APO02 Managed Strategy**.

What is the primary objective of **APRA CPS 234**?

**APRA CPS 234 requires regulated entities to maintain an information security capability commensurate with vulnerabilities and threats to information assets.** This minimizes the likelihood and impact of incidents on confidentiality, integrity, or availability (**CIA**) of information assets, including those managed by related parties or third parties (paragraphs 1, 15–16). The standard ensures continued sound operation of the entity, effective from 1 July 2019.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **APRA CPS 234**?

**APRA CPS 234 applies to all APRA-regulated entities, including authorised deposit-taking institutions (ADIs), general insurers, life companies, private health insurers, and RSE licensees.** It covers authorised non-operating holding companies (**NOHCs**) and requires group-wide application where an entity is the Head of a group, extending to non-regulated group entities (paragraphs 2–4). Foreign ADIs, Category C insurers, and eligible foreign life insurance companies (**EFLICs**) comply for Australian branch operations only (paragraph 3).

Does **APRA CPS 234** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**APRA CPS 234 does not mandate external audits or third-party certifications.** It requires internal audit to review design and operating effectiveness of information security controls, including those maintained by related parties and third parties, using appropriately skilled personnel (paragraphs 32–34). Where relying on third-party assurance for material-impact assets, internal audit must assess its adequacy (paragraph 34); systematic testing must be performed by functionally independent, skilled specialists (paragraphs 27–31).

How often should an assessment for **APRA CPS 234** be performed?

**APRA CPS 234 requires the testing program to be reviewed at least annually, or upon material changes to information assets or the business environment.** Testing frequency and nature must be commensurate with the rate of change in vulnerabilities/threats, asset criticality/sensitivity, incident consequences, exposure to untrusted environments, and asset changes (paragraphs 27, 31). Information security response plans must be reviewed and tested annually (paragraph 26).

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **APRA CPS 234**?

**Non-compliance with APRA CPS 234 exposes entities to APRA's prudential enforcement powers under relevant Acts.** These include directions for remediation, increased supervisory scrutiny, and potential penalties; APRA may adjust or exclude requirements in writing (paragraphs 9, 11). Entities must notify APRA within **72 hours** of material incidents or **10 business days** of material control weaknesses not remediable timely (paragraphs 35–36), triggering further oversight.

Can **APRA CPS 234** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, APRA CPS 234's outcomes-based requirements can be mapped to frameworks like ISO 27001 and NIST Cybersecurity Framework.** Its focus on governance, commensurate controls, systematic testing, and third-party oversight aligns with ISO 27001's ISMS structure and NIST's Identify-Protect-Detect-Respond-Recover functions, enabling operationalization without prescriptive controls (paragraphs 15, 18, 27).

What is the first step to begin implementing **APRA CPS 234**?

**The first step is for the Board to assume ultimate responsibility and define information security roles and responsibilities (paragraphs 13–14).** This establishes governance, followed by classifying information assets by criticality and sensitivity to drive commensurate capability, policies, and controls (paragraphs 20–21).

COBIT vs APRA CPS 234

Standards Comparison

COBIT

Voluntary

2019

Global framework for enterprise IT governance and management

APRA CPS 234

Mandatory

2019

Australian prudential standard for information security resilience.

Quick Verdict

COBIT offers flexible I&T governance for global enterprises, while APRA CPS 234 mandates information security resilience for Australian financial firms with strict testing and notifications. Organizations use COBIT for best-practice alignment; CPS 234 ensures regulatory compliance.

IT Governance

COBIT

COBIT 2019 Governance and Management Objectives

Cost

€€€€

Complexity

High

Implementation Time

12-18 months

Key Features

11 design factors enable tailored governance system
40 objectives across 5 domains (EDM, APO, BAI, DSS, MEA)
CMMI-based capability levels 0-5 for performance management
Explicit separation of governance from management
Goals cascade links stakeholder needs to metrics

Information Security

APRA CPS 234

APRA Prudential Standard CPS 234 Information Security

Cost

€€€€

Complexity

High

Implementation Time

12-18 months

Key Features

Board ultimate responsibility for information security
72-hour APRA notification for material incidents
Systematic risk-based testing of controls
Third-party managed assets fully in scope
Internal audit assurance including vendors

Detailed Analysis

A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

COBIT Details

What It Is

COBIT 2019 is ISACA's comprehensive framework for enterprise governance and management of information and technology (EGIT). It helps organizations create value from IT, manage risks, and optimize resources through a tailored governance system. Primary approach uses design factors and goals cascade for context-specific implementation.

Key Components

40 governance and management objectives grouped in 5 domains: EDM (governance), APO (align/plan), BAI (build/implement), DSS (deliver/support), MEA (monitor/assess).
6 governance system principles and 7 components (processes, structures, policies, etc.).
CMMI-based performance management with capability levels 0-5.
No formal certification; relies on assessments and assurance.

Why Organizations Use It

Aligns IT with business strategy via goals cascade.
Supports compliance (SOX, GDPR) and risk optimization.
Enhances auditability, stakeholder trust, and digital transformation.
Provides competitive edge through measurable IT value.

Implementation Overview

Phased: assess gaps, design via 11 factors, pilot objectives, measure capabilities.
Applies to all sizes/industries; training via ISACA certificates essential.
Focuses on tailoring, not full adoption; internal/external audits for assurance.

APRA CPS 234 Details

What It Is

APRA Prudential Standard CPS 234 (Information Security) is a binding regulation issued by the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority. Effective from 1 July 2019, it mandates APRA-regulated entities like banks, insurers, and superannuation funds to maintain information security capabilities commensurate with threats and vulnerabilities. Its risk-based approach emphasizes governance, controls, testing, and rapid incident notification to protect confidentiality, integrity, and availability (CIA) of information assets, including those managed by third parties.

Key Components

11 core requirements spanning board accountability, role definitions, policy frameworks, asset classification, lifecycle controls, incident response, systematic testing, and internal audit assurance.
Built on CIA triad principles with commensurability based on asset criticality/sensitivity.
No fixed controls; compliance via evidence-driven assurance, with 72-hour incident and 10-business-day weakness notifications to APRA.

Why Organizations Use It

Mandatory compliance avoids penalties, enforcement, and supervisory actions.
Enhances cyber resilience, third-party risk management, and operational continuity.
Builds stakeholder trust, reduces incident impacts, and supports prudential outcomes.

Implementation Overview

Phased: gap analysis, governance/policy setup, asset classification, controls/testing, incident planning.
Applies to all sizes of APRA entities in Australia; group-wide for Heads.
Requires ongoing internal audit; no formal certification but APRA scrutiny.

Key Differences

Aspect	COBIT	APRA CPS 234
Scope	Enterprise I&T governance and management across 40 objectives	Information security capability and cyber resilience for financial assets
Industry	All industries worldwide, any organization size	APRA-regulated Australian financial institutions only
Nature	Voluntary governance framework by ISACA	Mandatory prudential regulation with enforcement powers
Testing	Capability assessments (0-5 levels) using CMMI model	Systematic independent testing of controls, annually reviewed
Penalties	No legal penalties, loss of certification or credibility	Regulatory sanctions, fines, heightened supervision

Scope

COBIT

Enterprise I&T governance and management across 40 objectives

APRA CPS 234

Information security capability and cyber resilience for financial assets

Industry

COBIT

All industries worldwide, any organization size

APRA CPS 234

APRA-regulated Australian financial institutions only

Nature

COBIT

Voluntary governance framework by ISACA

APRA CPS 234

Mandatory prudential regulation with enforcement powers

Testing

COBIT

Capability assessments (0-5 levels) using CMMI model

APRA CPS 234

Systematic independent testing of controls, annually reviewed

Penalties

COBIT

No legal penalties, loss of certification or credibility

APRA CPS 234

Regulatory sanctions, fines, heightened supervision

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about COBIT and APRA CPS 234

COBIT FAQ

APRA CPS 234 FAQ

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

NIST CSF 2.0 Implementation Tiers Roadmap: Step-by-Step Guide from Partial to Adaptive Cybersecurity Maturity

Master NIST CSF 2.0 Implementation Tiers with a step-by-step roadmap. Assess your tier, build gap analyses, and advance from Partial (Tier 1) to Adaptive (Tier

Unpacking the True Cost: A Guide to Calculating TCO for Modern Compliance Monitoring Software

Unpack the true Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) for compliance monitoring software. Factor in licenses, implementation, training, maintenance, and ROI savings for

From Reactive Gatekeeper to Proactive Strategist: How Compliance Software Reshapes the Compliance Professional's Day

Discover how compliance software automates monitoring, delivers real-time insights, and transforms compliance pros from reactive gatekeepers to proactive strate

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

100+ Standards & Regulations

AI-Powered Insights

Collaborative Assessments

Actionable Recommendations

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

ISO 37001 vs ISO/IEC 42001:2023

Compare ISO 37001 vs ISO/IEC 42001:2023: Anti-bribery mastery meets AI governance. Uncover differences, benefits & implementation tips for compliance success. Choose now!

ISO 14001 vs PMBOK

ISO 14001 vs PMBOK: Compare EMS standard for env compliance with project mgmt guide for risk, lifecycle & integration. Boost strategy & efficiency—explore now!

RoHS vs ISO/IEC 42001:2023

RoHS vs ISO/IEC 42001:2023: Compare EEE hazardous substance limits with AI management systems. Unlock compliance strategies for electronics & AI innovation. Dive in!

COBIT

APRA CPS 234

Quick Verdict

COBIT

Key Features

APRA CPS 234

Key Features

Detailed Analysis

COBIT Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

APRA CPS 234 Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

Key Differences

Scope

Industry

Nature

Testing

Penalties

Frequently Asked Questions

COBIT FAQ

What is the primary objective of COBIT?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with COBIT?

Does COBIT require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for COBIT be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with COBIT?

Can COBIT be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing COBIT?

APRA CPS 234 FAQ

What is the primary objective of APRA CPS 234?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with APRA CPS 234?

Does APRA CPS 234 require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for APRA CPS 234 be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with APRA CPS 234?

Can APRA CPS 234 be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing APRA CPS 234?

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

NIST CSF 2.0 Implementation Tiers Roadmap: Step-by-Step Guide from Partial to Adaptive Cybersecurity Maturity

Unpacking the True Cost: A Guide to Calculating TCO for Modern Compliance Monitoring Software

From Reactive Gatekeeper to Proactive Strategist: How Compliance Software Reshapes the Compliance Professional's Day

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

ISO 37001 vs ISO/IEC 42001:2023

ISO 14001 vs PMBOK

RoHS vs ISO/IEC 42001:2023