What is the primary objective of **COBIT**?

**COBIT's primary objective is to help organizations create value from I&T initiatives, manage risk, and optimize resources through enterprise governance and management (EGIT).** COBIT 2019 defines a core model of **40 governance and management objectives** across five domains—**EDM (Evaluate, Direct, Monitor)**, **APO (Align, Plan, Organize)**, **BAI (Build, Acquire, Implement)**, **DSS (Deliver, Service, Support)**, and **MEA (Monitor, Evaluate, Assess)**—translating stakeholder needs via the goals cascade into actionable practices and **CMMI-based performance management** (levels 0-5).

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **COBIT**?

**No organizations are legally required to comply with COBIT, as it is a voluntary framework developed by ISACA, not a regulation.** Professionally, it is adopted by enterprises reliant on I&T for value creation, risk management, and compliance alignment, particularly in regulated sectors like finance and utilities where boards and executives must demonstrate EGIT through tailored governance systems using **11 design factors** (e.g., risk profile, sourcing model).

Does **COBIT** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**COBIT does not require external audit or third-party certification, as it is a framework, not a certifiable standard.** Organizations may conduct internal **capability assessments** using COBIT Performance Management (CPM) at levels 0-5, with **MEA04 Managed Assurance** supporting voluntary external reviews; ISACA offers individual credentials like **COBIT 2019 Foundation** and **Design & Implementation**.

How often should an assessment for **COBIT** be performed?

**COBIT assessments should be performed periodically as part of ongoing performance management, typically annually or aligned with business changes.** The **CMMI-based CPM** enables baseline, gap analysis, and maturity scoring (0-5) for the **40 objectives**, with **MEA** domain practices recommending continuous monitoring and reassessments triggered by design factors like threat landscape shifts or strategy updates.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **COBIT**?

**There are no direct legal consequences for non-compliance with COBIT, as it is a non-mandatory framework.** Indirect risks include weakened EGIT, exposing organizations to unmitigated I&T risks, audit findings in regulated environments, and failure to optimize resources or align with enterprise goals, potentially leading to operational disruptions or regulatory scrutiny via unaddressed controls.

An **COBIT** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, COBIT 2019 explicitly supports mapping to other international frameworks through its governance framework principles of alignment, openness, and flexibility.** The core model of **40 objectives** and **seven components** (e.g., processes, structures) enable integration as an overarching EGIT system, with design toolkits facilitating alignments while tailoring via **11 design factors**.

What is the first step to begin implementing **COBIT**?

**The first step to implement COBIT is to evaluate enterprise context using design factors and conduct a current-state capability assessment.** Per the **COBIT 2019 Design Guide**, apply the **11 design factors** (e.g., strategy, risk profile) and **goals cascade** (13 enterprise goals to alignment goals) to scope objectives, baseline via CPM (levels 0-5), and produce a tailored governance system roadmap.

What is the primary objective of **ISO 22000**?

**ISO 22000 enables organizations to consistently provide safe products and services by preventing, eliminating, or reducing food safety hazards to acceptable levels.** Published in 2018, it establishes, implements, maintains, and continually improves a **Food Safety Management System (FSMS)** through interactive communication, **PRPs**, **HACCP** principles, and dual PDCA cycles—one for organizational governance (Clauses 4–7, 9–10) and one for operational hazard control (Clause 8). It demonstrates compliance with statutory, regulatory, and customer requirements while supporting certification.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **ISO 22000**?

**No organization is legally required to comply with ISO 22000, as it is a voluntary international standard.** It applies professionally to any entity in the food chain—directly or indirectly—affecting food safety, including primary producers, feed/animal food producers, processors, packaging manufacturers, transporters, storage providers, retailers, and food services, regardless of size. Certification provides market access, supplier qualification, and assurance to customers/regulators.

Does **ISO 22000** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**ISO 22000 requires internal audits but external audits and third-party certification are voluntary.** Certification by accredited bodies follows a two-stage process: Stage 1 (readiness review) and Stage 2 (implementation verification), with annual surveillance and triennial recertification. Internal audits (Clause 9.2) must be risk-based, while external certification confirms FSMS conformity across Clauses 4–10.

How often should an assessment for **ISO 22000** be performed?

**Internal assessments for ISO 22000 must be performed at planned intervals via risk-based internal audits (Clause 9.2).** High-risk processes (e.g., CCPs/OPRPs, allergens) require more frequent audits; management reviews (Clause 9.3) occur at least annually, incorporating performance data. Verification of PRPs, controls, and traceability is ongoing, with full FSMS gap reassessments annually or before changes.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **ISO 22000**?

**Non-compliance with ISO 22000 results in certification denial, suspension, or withdrawal by the certifying body.** Internally, it leads to ineffective FSMS, uncontrolled hazards, recalls, product holds, regulatory violations, customer loss, and reputational damage. Clause 10 mandates corrective actions for nonconformities; persistent issues trigger management review decisions on resources or system overhaul.

An **ISO 22000** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, ISO 22000:2018 adopts the High-Level Structure (HLS), enabling seamless mapping and integration with other ISO management system standards.** Its Clauses 4–10 align with ISO 9001 (quality) and ISO 14001 (environment), supporting combined audits and a single integrated management system while retaining food safety-specific Clause 8 requirements.

What is the first step to begin implementing **ISO 22000**?

**The first step to implement ISO 22000 is defining the FSMS scope and understanding the organization's context (Clause 4).** Identify internal/external issues, interested parties' requirements, and boundaries (products, sites, processes, outsourced activities), followed by a gap analysis against Clauses 4–10 to prioritize risks and resources.

COBIT vs ISO 22000

Standards Comparison

COBIT

Voluntary

2019

Framework for enterprise IT governance and management

ISO 22000

Voluntary

2018

International standard for food safety management systems.

Quick Verdict

COBIT provides IT governance frameworks for all enterprises, while ISO 22000 ensures food safety management across the food chain. Companies adopt COBIT for value-driven IT alignment and ISO 22000 for hazard control and certification.

IT Governance

COBIT

COBIT 2019 Governance and Management Framework

Cost

€€€€

Complexity

High

Implementation Time

12-18 months

Key Features

11 design factors enable tailored governance systems
40 objectives across 5 domains (EDM, APO, BAI, DSS, MEA)
CMMI-based capability levels 0-5 for performance
Explicit separation of governance from management
Goals cascade links stakeholder needs to metrics

Food Safety

ISO 22000

ISO 22000:2018 Food safety management systems

Cost

€€€€

Complexity

High

Implementation Time

12-18 months

Key Features

High-Level Structure (HLS) for integrated management systems
Dual PDCA cycles for organizational and operational control
HACCP integration with PRPs, OPRPs, and CCPs
Risk-based thinking for hazards and opportunities
Interactive communication across food chain

Detailed Analysis

A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

COBIT Details

What It Is

COBIT 2019 is ISACA's comprehensive framework for enterprise governance and management of information and technology (EGIT). It translates stakeholder needs into actionable objectives via a tailored, risk-optimized approach using design factors and goals cascade.

Key Components

40 governance/management objectives grouped in 5 domains: EDM (governance), APO (strategy), BAI (delivery), DSS (operations), MEA (assurance).
6 governance principles and 7 components (processes, structures, policies, culture, information, services, people).
CMMI-based performance management (capability levels 0-5); no formal certification but assessments via ISACA tools.

Why Organizations Use It

Aligns IT with business value, optimizes resources, manages risks.
Supports compliance (SOX, GDPR) and assurance; builds board trust.
Enables digital transformation, interoperability with ISO 27001/ITIL.

Implementation Overview

Phased: assess gaps, design via toolkit, pilot objectives, measure MEA.
Suits large/regulated enterprises; voluntary, training-focused (Foundation/Design certs).

ISO 22000 Details

What It Is

ISO 22000:2018 is the international standard specifying requirements for a Food Safety Management System (FSMS). It applies to any organization in the food chain, using a risk-based approach integrating HACCP principles with management system discipline via the High-Level Structure (HLS).

Key Components

**Clauses 4-10Context, leadership, planning, support, operation, performance evaluation, improvement.
Core elements: PRPs, hazard analysis, CCPs/OPRPs, traceability, communication, internal audits.
Built on two PDCA cycles (organizational and operational); voluntary certification model.

Why Organizations Use It

Meets regulatory/customer requirements; reduces food safety risks.
Enhances supply chain trust, market access (e.g., GFSI schemes like FSSC 22000).
Drives efficiency, resilience, integration with ISO 9001/14001.

Implementation Overview

Phased: gap analysis, PRPs/hazard plans, training, audits, certification (stage 1/2).
Scalable for all sizes/industries in food chain; 9-18 months typical.

Key Differences

Aspect	COBIT	ISO 22000
Scope	Enterprise IT governance and management	Food safety management systems
Industry	All industries worldwide	Food chain organizations globally
Nature	Voluntary governance framework	Voluntary certification standard
Testing	Capability assessments 0-5 levels	Internal audits and certification
Penalties	No legal penalties	Loss of certification

Scope

COBIT

Enterprise IT governance and management

ISO 22000

Food safety management systems

Industry

COBIT

All industries worldwide

ISO 22000

Food chain organizations globally

Nature

COBIT

Voluntary governance framework

ISO 22000

Voluntary certification standard

Testing

COBIT

Capability assessments 0-5 levels

ISO 22000

Internal audits and certification

Penalties

COBIT

No legal penalties

ISO 22000

Loss of certification

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about COBIT and ISO 22000

COBIT FAQ

ISO 22000 FAQ

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

NIST CSF 2.0 Implementation Tiers Roadmap: Step-by-Step Guide from Partial to Adaptive Cybersecurity Maturity

Master NIST CSF 2.0 Implementation Tiers with a step-by-step roadmap. Assess your tier, build gap analyses, and advance from Partial (Tier 1) to Adaptive (Tier

CMMC Cost Calculator: Realistic Budgets for Levels 1-3, C3PAO Fees, and ROI for Small DIB Suppliers

Calculate realistic CMMC costs for Levels 1-3: self-assessments, C3PAO fees, tooling, remediation & ROI. Interactive tool for small DIB suppliers. Get benchmark

The Tool Landscape for Reaching and Maintaining ISO 27701 Compliance

Discover the top tools for ISO 27701 compliance. Compare functionality, complexity, costs, and benefits to choose the best solution for your privacy program. Ac

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

100+ Standards & Regulations

AI-Powered Insights

Collaborative Assessments

Actionable Recommendations

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

C-TPAT vs ISO 27701

Compare C-TPAT vs ISO 27701: Supply chain security powerhouse meets privacy management gold standard. Uncover key differences, benefits & strategies for compliance mastery now.

DORA vs SAMA CSF

Explore DORA vs SAMA CSF: EU resilience rules vs Saudi cyber framework. Uncover governance, risk mgmt & testing diffs for compliance edge. Master both now!

NIS2 vs LEED

Compare NIS2 vs LEED: EU cybersecurity directive expands scope, mandates reporting & fines up to 2% turnover, vs LEED's green building points for energy, IAQ. Achieve compliance mastery.

COBIT

ISO 22000

Quick Verdict

COBIT

Key Features

ISO 22000

Key Features

Detailed Analysis

COBIT Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

ISO 22000 Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

Key Differences

Scope

Industry

Nature

Testing

Penalties

Frequently Asked Questions

COBIT FAQ

What is the primary objective of COBIT?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with COBIT?

Does COBIT require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for COBIT be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with COBIT?

An COBIT be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing COBIT?

ISO 22000 FAQ

What is the primary objective of ISO 22000?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with ISO 22000?

Does ISO 22000 require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for ISO 22000 be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with ISO 22000?

An ISO 22000 be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing ISO 22000?

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

NIST CSF 2.0 Implementation Tiers Roadmap: Step-by-Step Guide from Partial to Adaptive Cybersecurity Maturity

CMMC Cost Calculator: Realistic Budgets for Levels 1-3, C3PAO Fees, and ROI for Small DIB Suppliers

The Tool Landscape for Reaching and Maintaining ISO 27701 Compliance

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

C-TPAT vs ISO 27701

DORA vs SAMA CSF

NIS2 vs LEED