Standards Comparison

    DORA

    Mandatory
    2023

    EU regulation for digital operational resilience in financial sector

    VS

    ISO/IEC 42001:2023

    Voluntary
    2023

    International standard for AI management systems

    Quick Verdict

    DORA mandates ICT resilience for EU finance against disruptions, while ISO/IEC 42001:2023 is a voluntary global standard for responsible AI governance. Financial firms adopt DORA for regulatory compliance; AI organizations pursue 42001 for ethical trust and certification.

    Digital Operational Resilience

    DORA

    Regulation (EU) 2022/2554 Digital Operational Resilience Act

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    18-24 months

    Key Features

    • Mandates comprehensive ICT risk management frameworks
    • Requires 4-hour reporting for major ICT incidents
    • Enforces triennial threat-led penetration testing (TLPT)
    • Oversees critical third-party ICT providers (CTPPs)
    • Harmonizes resilience across 27 EU member states
    AI Management

    ISO/IEC 42001:2023

    ISO/IEC 42001:2023 Artificial Intelligence Management System

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    6-12 months

    Key Features

    • PDCA-based framework for AI governance
    • Mandatory AI Impact Assessments for high-risk systems
    • 38 AI-specific controls in Annex A
    • Full AI lifecycle management controls
    • Seamless integration with ISO 27001 HLS

    Detailed Analysis

    A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

    DORA Details

    What It Is

    Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA), Regulation (EU) 2022/2554, is an EU regulation strengthening ICT resilience for financial entities against disruptions like cyberattacks. It targets 20 financial types and critical third-party providers (CTPPs), employing a risk-based, proportional approach across 27 member states.

    Key Components

    • **ICT Risk ManagementFrameworks for identification, protection, detection, response, recovery; annual reviews.
    • **Incident Reporting4-hour initial, 72-hour updates, 1-month root-cause analysis for major incidents.
    • **Resilience TestingAnnual basic tests, triennial TLPT for critical functions.
    • **Third-Party OversightDue diligence, monitoring, ESAs supervision of CTPPs. Enforced via RTS/ITS, fines up to 2% global turnover.

    Why Organizations Use It

    Mandated for ~22,000 entities to avoid penalties, counter 74% ransomware prevalence, ensure continuity amid threats like CrowdStrike outage, build trust, harmonize compliance.

    Implementation Overview

    Conduct gap analyses, develop policies, implement testing/monitoring; proportional by size/complexity. EU financial sector focus, full application January 17, 2025; ESAs oversight, no formal certification.

    ISO/IEC 42001:2023 Details

    What It Is

    ISO/IEC 42001:2023 is the world's first international standard for Artificial Intelligence Management Systems (AIMS). It specifies requirements to establish, implement, maintain, and improve AIMS, managing AI risks and opportunities responsibly. Applicable universally, it uses Plan-Do-Check-Act (PDCA) and High-Level Structure (HLS) for governance across AI lifecycles.

    Key Components

    • Clauses 4-10: context, leadership, planning, support, operations, evaluation, improvement.
    • **Annex A38 AI-specific controls (e.g., bias mitigation, transparency, third-party risks).
    • Mandatory AI Impact Assessments (AIIAs) for high-risk AI.
    • Third-party certification with 3-year validity, annual surveillance audits.

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Mitigates AI risks like bias, drift, ethics; fosters innovation.
    • Aligns with EU AI Act, NIST; enhances compliance.
    • Builds trust, reputation (e.g., Microsoft Copilot certification).
    • Cost savings via ISO 27001/9001 integration; competitive differentiation.

    Implementation Overview

    • Phased: gap analysis, policies, AIIAs, training, audits.
    • Suits all sizes/sectors; 6-12 months typical with tools like ISMS.online.
    • Requires leadership, resources, 3+ months operational data.

    Key Differences

    Scope

    DORA
    Digital operational resilience in finance against ICT risks
    ISO/IEC 42001:2023
    AI management systems across full AI lifecycle

    Industry

    DORA
    EU financial entities and critical ICT providers
    ISO/IEC 42001:2023
    All industries, organizations worldwide

    Nature

    DORA
    Mandatory EU regulation with enforcement
    ISO/IEC 42001:2023
    Voluntary international certification standard

    Testing

    DORA
    Annual basic tests, triennial TLPT for critical
    ISO/IEC 42001:2023
    Audits, AIIAs, continuous monitoring via PDCA

    Penalties

    DORA
    Up to 2% global turnover fines
    ISO/IEC 42001:2023
    Loss of certification, no legal penalties

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Common questions about DORA and ISO/IEC 42001:2023

    DORA FAQ

    ISO/IEC 42001:2023 FAQ

    You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

    Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

    Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

    Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

    100+ Standards & Regulations
    AI-Powered Insights
    Collaborative Assessments
    Actionable Recommendations

    Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages