What is the primary objective of **GDPR**?

**The primary objective of **GDPR** is to protect the fundamental rights and freedoms of natural persons, particularly their right to the protection of personal data, while ensuring the free movement of personal data within the EU.** Enacted as Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and enforceable since **May 25, 2018**, it replaces the fragmented 1995 Data Protection Directive by establishing uniform rules across EU member states. Core principles under **Article 5** include lawfulness, fairness, transparency, purpose limitation, data minimisation, accuracy, storage limitation, integrity, confidentiality, and accountability, mandating organizations to demonstrate compliance.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **GDPR**?

**All **data controllers** and **data processors** that process **personal data** of individuals in the EU/EEA must comply with **GDPR**, regardless of the organization's location, under its extraterritorial scope in **Article 3**. This applies to EU-established entities and non-EU entities offering goods/services to or monitoring behavior of EU data subjects. **Personal data** broadly includes any information relating to an identifiable natural person, such as names, IP addresses, or genetic data. Mandatory **Data Protection Officers (DPOs)** are required for public authorities or large-scale systematic monitoring/processing of special categories of data (**Article 37**).

Does **GDPR** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**No, **GDPR** does not mandate external audits or third-party certification for compliance.** Organizations must self-assess and demonstrate adherence via internal measures like **Records of Processing Activities (ROPA)** (**Article 30**), **Data Protection Impact Assessments (DPIAs)** for high-risk processing (**Article 35**), and breach notifications within 72 hours (**Articles 33-34**). Optional certifications and codes of conduct (**Articles 40-43**) provide compliance evidence but are voluntary; supervisory authorities may request documentation during investigations.

How often should an assessment for **GDPR** be performed?

**GDPR assessments, particularly **Data Protection Impact Assessments (DPIAs)**, must be conducted prior to high-risk processing and reviewed whenever risks change, ensuring ongoing accountability under **Article 35**. **Records of Processing Activities (ROPA)** require continuous maintenance (**Article 30**), while **security of processing** evaluations (**Article 32**) demand regular review based on evolving risks, state-of-the-art measures, and context. No fixed frequency is prescribed; assessments are risk-based and iterative to reflect new processing activities or threats.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **GDPR**?

**Non-compliance with **GDPR** can result in administrative fines up to €20 million or 4% of total global annual turnover (whichever is higher) for severe violations, or up to €10 million or 2% for lesser infringements, per **Article 83**. Supervisory authorities issue penalties following investigations, with examples including €50 million against Google (2019) for consent violations. Additional consequences include reputational damage, data subject lawsuits (**Article 82**), and mandatory remedial orders like processing bans (**Article 58**).

Can **GDPR** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, **GDPR** principles such as accountability, data subject rights, and lawful processing bases can be mapped to other international frameworks like Brazil's LGPD, California's CCPA/CPRA, and Japan's APPI, which emulate its core tenets.** These alignments facilitate compliance convergence, especially for multinational entities, though differences exist in consent models (opt-in vs. opt-out) and penalties. **GDPR**'s extraterritorial reach has established it as a global benchmark via the "Brussels Effect."

What is the first step to begin implementing **GDPR**?

**The first step to implement **GDPR** is to conduct a comprehensive inventory of personal data processing activities to establish **Records of Processing Activities (ROPA)** under **Article 30**. This identifies data flows, legal bases, risks, and accountable parties, enabling subsequent actions like appointing a **DPO** (**Article 37**), performing **DPIAs** (**Article 35**), and embedding **privacy by design/default** (**Article 25**).

What is the primary objective of **AS9110C**?

**AS9110C's primary objective is to enable aviation maintenance organizations to consistently provide products and services meeting customer and applicable statutory/regulatory requirements while enhancing customer satisfaction through effective QMS application and continual improvement.** It incorporates ISO 9001:2015's Annex SL structure (Clauses 4–10) with maintenance-specific additions like configuration management, product safety, counterfeit parts prevention, traceability, preservation, and human factors controls to ensure continuing airworthiness.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **AS9110C**?

**AS9110C applies to organizations whose primary business is aviation maintenance, repair, overhaul (MRO), and continuing airworthiness management services.** This includes repair stations, independent MRO providers, airline maintenance departments, OEM MRO operations, and component shops for civil/military aircraft, regardless of size, to demonstrate QMS conformity via IAQG OASIS listing for supply-chain access.

Does **AS9110C** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**Yes, AS9110C requires third-party certification through accredited bodies listed in the IAQG OASIS database.** Organizations must undergo Stage 1 (documentation review) and Stage 2 (on-site effectiveness audit) after QMS operational maturity (minimum 3 months, full internal audit cycle, and management review), with ongoing surveillance audits.

How often should an assessment for **AS9110C** be performed?

**Internal audits for AS9110C must be performed at planned intervals based on process risk, status, and importance, typically quarterly for high-risk maintenance processes initially.** Management reviews occur at least annually, with surveillance audits by certification bodies annually and recertification every 3 years.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **AS9110C**?

**Non-compliance with AS9110C risks loss of certification, exclusion from IAQG OASIS, contract ineligibility with OEMs/airlines, regulatory sanctions (e.g., FAA/EASA Part 145 certificate suspension), safety incidents, and financial losses from rework or litigation.** It undermines continuing airworthiness demonstration.

Can **AS9110C** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**AS9110C follows ISO 9001:2015's Annex SL high-level structure, enabling direct mapping to compatible standards sharing Clauses 4–10.** Its terminology (e.g., documented information, external providers) and PDCA/risk-based thinking support integrated management systems without exclusions unless justified in scope.

What is the first step to begin implementing **AS9110C**?

**The first step is to define QMS scope, determine internal/external issues (Clause 4), identify interested parties/regulatory requirements, and conduct a gap analysis against Clauses 4–10.** Secure executive sponsorship, map to regulatory approvals (e.g., FAA/EASA), and produce a prioritized remediation plan.

GDPR vs AS9110C

Standards Comparison

GDPR

Mandatory

2016

EU regulation for personal data protection and privacy

AS9110C

Mandatory

2016

Aerospace standard for aviation maintenance quality management.

Quick Verdict

GDPR mandates data privacy for EU residents globally, enforcing rights and accountability with hefty fines. AS9110C is a voluntary QMS certification for aviation maintenance, ensuring quality and safety via audits. Companies adopt GDPR for compliance, AS9110C for market access.

Data Privacy

GDPR

General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR)

Cost

€€€€

Complexity

Medium

Implementation Time

18-24 months

Key Features

Broad extraterritorial scope targeting EU data subjects
Fines up to 4% of global annual turnover
Accountability principle requiring demonstrable compliance
Enhanced rights including erasure and portability
72-hour mandatory personal data breach notification

Quality Management

AS9110C

AS9110C: Quality Management Systems for Aviation Maintenance

Cost

€€€€

Complexity

High

Implementation Time

6-12 months

Key Features

Risk-based thinking in strategic and operational planning
Configuration management and product traceability controls
Counterfeit and suspect parts prevention program
Human factors integration in root cause analysis
Continuing airworthiness and maintenance release requirements

Detailed Analysis

A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

GDPR Details

What It Is

The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), or Regulation (EU) 2016/679, is a binding EU regulation directly applicable in all member states since May 25, 2018. It protects natural persons' fundamental rights regarding personal data processing and ensures free data movement in the digital single market. GDPR adopts a risk-based, accountability-focused approach, requiring organizations to justify and demonstrate lawful processing.

Key Components

Core elements include seven principles (lawfulness, purpose limitation, data minimization, accuracy, storage limitation, integrity/confidentiality, accountability), enhanced data subject rights (access, rectification, erasure/'right to be forgotten', portability, objection), mandatory Data Protection Impact Assessments (DPIAs) for high-risk processing, Data Protection Officer (DPO) appointments, and 72-hour breach notifications. Enforcement relies on national supervisory authorities with fines up to €20M or 4% global turnover; no formal certification exists.

Why Organizations Use It

Compliance is legally required for any entity processing EU residents' data, mitigating severe financial risks. It enhances trust, reputation, and competitive positioning as the global 'gold standard', supports risk management amid breaches, and facilitates cross-border operations.

Implementation Overview

Involves gap analysis, policy updates, staff training, technical safeguards like pseudonymization, and records of processing. Applies universally to controllers/processors handling EU data, scaling by organization size/location. Ongoing audits by authorities ensure sustained adherence.

AS9110C Details

What It Is

AS9110C (AS9110:2016 Rev C) is an international certification standard for quality management systems (QMS) in aviation maintenance organizations, such as repair stations and MRO providers. It builds on ISO 9001:2015 with aerospace-specific requirements for continuing airworthiness, using a risk-based thinking approach via Annex SL structure and PDCA cycle.

Key Components

Core clauses 4–10 covering context, leadership, planning, support, operation, evaluation, improvement.
Aviation additions: configuration management, counterfeit parts prevention, human factors, traceability, external provider controls.
No fixed control count; emphasizes documented information and evidence-based conformity.
Certification via IAQG-accredited bodies with audits.

Why Organizations Use It

Meets customer/OEM contracts and regulatory alignments (FAA/EASA).
Mitigates safety risks, ensures traceability for airworthiness.
Enhances market access via OASIS listing, improves on-time delivery and customer satisfaction.
Builds stakeholder trust through proven QMS effectiveness.

Implementation Overview

Phased: gap analysis, process design, training, audits, certification (6-12 months typical).
Applies to MROs globally, scalable by size.
Requires internal audits, management reviews before Stage 2 certification.

Key Differences

Aspect	GDPR	AS9110C
Scope	Personal data protection and privacy	Aerospace maintenance quality management
Industry	All sectors, EU residents globally	Aviation MRO organizations worldwide
Nature	Mandatory EU regulation	Voluntary certification standard
Testing	DPIAs, audits by DPAs	Internal/external audits, certification
Penalties	Up to 4% global turnover fines	Loss of certification, no legal fines

Scope

GDPR

Personal data protection and privacy

AS9110C

Aerospace maintenance quality management

Industry

GDPR

All sectors, EU residents globally

AS9110C

Aviation MRO organizations worldwide

Nature

GDPR

Mandatory EU regulation

AS9110C

Voluntary certification standard

Testing

GDPR

DPIAs, audits by DPAs

AS9110C

Internal/external audits, certification

Penalties

GDPR

Up to 4% global turnover fines

AS9110C

Loss of certification, no legal fines

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about GDPR and AS9110C

GDPR FAQ

AS9110C FAQ

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

What if the EU would not have made GDPR mandatory...

Explore a world without mandatory GDPR: How would organizations manage data? What data privacy regs would emerge? Uncover impacts on businesses and privacy laws

How to Implement CIS Controls v8.1 as a ‘Control Backbone’ for NIS2 & DORA (Step-by-Step Implementation Guide)

Deploy CIS Controls v8.1 as a control backbone for NIS2 & DORA compliance. Step-by-step roadmap (IG1→IG2), deliverables, metrics & evidence model for hybrid/clo

NIST CSF 2.0 Govern Function Deep Dive: Building Executive Cybersecurity Governance from Scratch

Step-by-step blueprint for NIST CSF 2.0 Govern function: templates, RACI matrices, metrics to elevate cybersecurity governance to boardroom level. Reduce breach

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

100+ Standards & Regulations

AI-Powered Insights

Collaborative Assessments

Actionable Recommendations

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

IATF 16949 vs ISO 41001

Compare IATF 16949 vs ISO 41001: Automotive QMS rigor—core tools, defect prevention, supplier governance—vs FM's stakeholder alignment, sustainability focus. Uncover key diffs in leadership, risks & ops. Optimize now!

PMBOK vs COPPA

Discover PMBOK vs COPPA: Compare project mgmt standards & child privacy law. Master compliance frameworks, tailoring strategies, risks & implementation for success. Dive in!

CCPA vs EN 1090

CCPA vs EN 1090: Compare privacy rights & fines with steel structure standards & CE marking. Master thresholds, audits, best practices for compliance success. Unlock now!

GDPR

AS9110C

Quick Verdict

GDPR

Key Features

AS9110C

Key Features

Detailed Analysis

GDPR Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

AS9110C Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

Key Differences

Scope

Industry

Nature

Testing

Penalties

Frequently Asked Questions

GDPR FAQ

What is the primary objective of GDPR?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with GDPR?

Does GDPR require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for GDPR be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with GDPR?

Can GDPR be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing GDPR?

AS9110C FAQ

What is the primary objective of AS9110C?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with AS9110C?

Does AS9110C require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for AS9110C be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with AS9110C?

Can AS9110C be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing AS9110C?

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

What if the EU would not have made GDPR mandatory...

How to Implement CIS Controls v8.1 as a ‘Control Backbone’ for NIS2 & DORA (Step-by-Step Implementation Guide)

NIST CSF 2.0 Govern Function Deep Dive: Building Executive Cybersecurity Governance from Scratch

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

IATF 16949 vs ISO 41001

PMBOK vs COPPA

CCPA vs EN 1090