What is the primary objective of **ISO 19600**?

**ISO 19600:2014 provides guidelines for establishing, developing, implementing, evaluating, maintaining, and improving an effective compliance management system (CMS).** It uses a Plan-Do-Check-Act (PDCA) cycle and high-level structure, emphasizing principles of good governance, proportionality, transparency, and sustainability for all organization types and sizes.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **ISO 19600**?

**No organization is legally required to comply with ISO 19600, as it offers non-mandatory guidelines rather than requirements.** It applies voluntarily to any public, private, or non-profit entity seeking a scalable CMS, proportionate to size, structure, nature, and complexity of activities.

Does **ISO 19600** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**ISO 19600 does not require external audits or third-party certification, being a guidance standard without specified requirements.** Organizations may conduct internal audits at planned intervals per Clause 9.2, using ISO 19011 criteria, but certification is unavailable; it was withdrawn in 2021 and replaced by certifiable ISO 37301.

How often should an assessment for **ISO 19600** be performed?

**ISO 19600 recommends ongoing monitoring, measurement, analysis, and evaluation of CMS performance per Clause 9.1, with reassessments triggered by changes or issues.** Compliance risks (Clause 4.6) and obligations (Clause 4.5) require dynamic review; audits occur at planned intervals (Clause 9.2), and management reviews (Clause 9.3) consider performance data periodically.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **ISO 19600**?

**Non-alignment with ISO 19600 guidelines carries no direct penalties, as it is voluntary guidance without enforceable requirements.** Indirect risks include unmitigated compliance obligations leading to regulatory fines or reputational damage; courts may reference CMS absence when assessing penalties for contraventions.

Can **ISO 19600** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, ISO 19600’s high-level structure and PDCA cycle enable mapping to other ISO management system standards for integration.** Its context analysis, leadership, planning, support, operation, evaluation, and improvement clauses align with shared architectures, supporting unified processes while preserving compliance function independence.

What is the first step to begin implementing **ISO 19600**?

**The first step is determining the CMS scope and understanding the organization’s context per Clauses 4.1–4.4.** This includes internal/external issues, interested parties’ needs, compliance obligations identification (Clause 4.5), governance principles, and documenting boundaries as proportionate information.

What is the primary objective of **ISO 56002**?

**ISO 56002 provides guidance for organizations to establish, implement, maintain, and continually improve an Innovation Management System (IMS).** The standard reframes innovation as a managed capability for value realization through a PDCA-aligned framework across Clauses 4–10: context, leadership, planning, support, operation, performance evaluation, and improvement. It emphasizes systemic governance over specific tools, enabling adaptability across innovation types (product, service, process, model, method) and approaches (internal/open).

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **ISO 56002**?

**No organizations are legally required to comply with ISO 56002, as it is voluntary guidance applicable to all organization types, sizes, sectors, and innovation ambitions.** It targets established organizations for optimal governance of portfolio-scale innovation, with partial applicability for start-ups and temporary entities. Professionals such as C-suite executives, innovation officers, and compliance managers adopt it to demonstrate capability to stakeholders, integrate with existing systems, and address fragmentation like "innovation theater."

Does **ISO 56002** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**ISO 56002 does not require external audits or third-party certification, being explicitly guidance rather than a requirements standard.** Organizations conduct internal audits (Clause 9) and management reviews for conformity. External assurance is optional via accredited bodies against self-defined IMS criteria, often as preparation for ISO 56001 certification, to build stakeholder confidence without mandatory schemes.

How often should an assessment for **ISO 56002** be performed?

**ISO 56002 requires regular performance evaluations through monitoring, measurement, internal audits, and management reviews, with frequency determined by organizational context and risks.** Clause 9 mandates evidence-based assessments using defined KPIs, tools, and responsibilities; typical cadences include annual audits, quarterly portfolio reviews, and ongoing KPI tracking to support continual improvement (Clause 10).

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **ISO 56002**?

**Non-compliance with ISO 56002 carries no legal penalties, as it imposes no mandatory requirements.** However, organizations risk strategic obsolescence, resource waste on "zombie projects," stalled value realization, and weakened stakeholder trust due to unmanaged innovation uncertainty, poor portfolio governance, and fragmented processes lacking PDCA discipline.

Can **ISO 56002** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, ISO 56002 aligns structurally with other ISO management system standards via its High-Level Structure (HLS) and PDCA cycle across Clauses 4–10.** This enables integration of IMS elements like leadership reviews, audits, and documented information with compatible frameworks, reducing duplication while tailoring innovation governance to shared processes.

What is the first step to begin implementing **ISO 56002**?

**The first step to implement ISO 56002 is building awareness and conducting a gap analysis against Clauses 4–10 to assess current IMS maturity.** This involves educating leadership on benefits, scanning context (Clause 4), and prioritizing actions via diagnostics, establishing a foundation for phased rollout: policy definition, resource allocation, and pilot operations.

ISO 19600 vs ISO 56002

Standards Comparison

ISO 19600

Voluntary

2014

Guidelines for scalable compliance management systems

ISO 56002

Voluntary

2019

International guidance standard for innovation management systems

Quick Verdict

ISO 19600 provides compliance management guidelines for risk-based CMS across all organizations, now withdrawn for ISO 37301. ISO 56002 offers innovation management system guidance for value creation. Companies adopt them for structured governance, integration with PDCA, and benchmarking without certification mandates.

Compliance Management

ISO 19600

ISO 19600:2014 Compliance management systems — Guidelines

Cost

€€€

Complexity

Medium

Implementation Time

6-12 months

Key Features

Explicit governance principles for compliance independence
PDCA cycle with high-level management structure
Proportionality scaled to organization size complexity
Systematic broad compliance obligations identification
Balanced core and soft performance measures

Innovation Management

ISO 56002

ISO 56002:2019 Innovation management system — Guidance

Cost

€€€

Complexity

Medium

Implementation Time

12-18 months

Key Features

PDCA cycle for continual IMS improvement
High-Level Structure for system integration
Leadership commitment and policy requirements
Portfolio management and uncertainty handling
Performance evaluation with KPIs and audits

Detailed Analysis

A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

ISO 19600 Details

What It Is

ISO 19600:2014 provides guidelines (not requirements) for establishing, implementing, evaluating, maintaining, and improving compliance management systems (CMS). It applies universally to all organizations, using a risk-based, principles-driven approach with PDCA cycle and high-level structure for integration.

Key Components

Core clauses: context, leadership, planning, support, operation, performance evaluation, improvement.
**Principlesgood governance, proportionality, transparency, sustainability.
**Governance focuscompliance function independence, board access, resources.
No fixed controls; scalable guidance, non-certifiable (replaced by ISO 37301).

Why Organizations Use It

Mitigates compliance risks (legal, voluntary obligations).
Enhances governance, culture, efficiency.
Builds regulator defensibility, stakeholder trust.
Integrates with ISO systems (9001, 14001); strategic benchmarking.

Implementation Overview

Phased: gap analysis, policy design, controls, monitoring, reviews.
Scalable for SMEs (6-12 months) to enterprises (12-36 months).
All sizes/industries; internal audits, no external certification.

ISO 56002 Details

What It Is

ISO 56002:2019 is an international guidance standard titled Innovation management — Innovation management system — Guidance. It provides a framework for organizations to establish, implement, maintain, and improve an Innovation Management System (IMS). The primary purpose is to manage innovation as a repeatable capability for value creation, applicable to all organization types, sizes, and sectors. It uses a PDCA (Plan-Do-Check-Act) cycle aligned with ISO's High-Level Structure (HLS).

Key Components

Seven core clauses (4-10): context, leadership, planning, support, operation, performance evaluation, improvement.
Eight principles: value realization, leadership, strategic direction, culture, portfolio thinking, uncertainty management, learning, stakeholder engagement.
Non-prescriptive; no fixed controls, focuses on tailored processes.
Guidance only; conformity via self-assessment or third-party audits, not formal certification.

Why Organizations Use It

Drives strategic innovation governance and portfolio discipline.
Reduces 'innovation theater' and zombie projects.
Enhances competitiveness, risk management, stakeholder trust.
Integrates with ISO 9001, 27001 for efficiency.
Voluntary but builds credibility for partnerships, investors.

Implementation Overview

Phased: awareness, gap analysis, design, pilot, scale, sustain.
Involves leadership policy, processes, KPIs, audits.
Suited for established organizations; scalable for SMEs.
No mandatory certification; optional assurance via ISO 56004.

Key Differences

Aspect	ISO 19600	ISO 56002
Scope	Compliance management systems guidelines	Innovation management systems guidance
Industry	All organizations worldwide, any size	All organizations worldwide, established focus
Nature	Voluntary guidelines, non-certifiable, withdrawn	Voluntary guidance, non-certifiable, current
Testing	Internal audits, management reviews recommended	Internal audits, management reviews recommended
Penalties	No penalties, reputational risk only	No penalties, competitive disadvantage only

Scope

ISO 19600

Compliance management systems guidelines

ISO 56002

Innovation management systems guidance

Industry

ISO 19600

All organizations worldwide, any size

ISO 56002

All organizations worldwide, established focus

Nature

ISO 19600

Voluntary guidelines, non-certifiable, withdrawn

ISO 56002

Voluntary guidance, non-certifiable, current

Testing

ISO 19600

Internal audits, management reviews recommended

ISO 56002

Internal audits, management reviews recommended

Penalties

ISO 19600

No penalties, reputational risk only

ISO 56002

No penalties, competitive disadvantage only

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about ISO 19600 and ISO 56002

ISO 19600 FAQ

ISO 56002 FAQ

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

ISO 27701 2025 Update: Navigating Standalone Certification Myths, Audit Realities, and a 90-Day PIMS Launch Plan

Debunk ISO 27701 2025 standalone certification myths vs ISO 27001. Get a 90-day PIMS launch roadmap, checklists & audit prep to certify faster amid global priva

SOC 2 for Fintech Startups: First 5 Steps to Compliance with Confidentiality Criterion Infographic

First 5 steps to SOC 2 compliance with Confidentiality for fintech SaaS. Infographic maps controls to risks like encryption & TPRM. Integrates GLBA/PCI DSS over

Image this: What if GDPR would have NOT been implemented by the EU

What if the EU never implemented GDPR? Explore this hypothetical: consumer data protection in Dec 2025, key differences, pros/cons for users & companies. Read t

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

100+ Standards & Regulations

AI-Powered Insights

Collaborative Assessments

Actionable Recommendations

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

OSHA vs K-PIPA

Compare OSHA vs K-PIPA: US safety regs clash with Korea's data privacy laws. Gain expert insights, compliance strategies, and global risk tips to safeguard operations.

AS9100 vs ISO 21001

Discover AS9100 vs ISO 21001: Aerospace QMS rigor meets educational excellence. Compare clauses, risks & benefits to select the right standard for your sector. Dive in now!

Mastering ISO 27701 Annexes: Controller vs. Processor Controls with GDPR Mapping and Benchmarks

Master ISO 27701 Annex A controls for PII controllers & processors. Features GDPR Article crosswalks, DSAR/response benchmarks, & checklists to select, justify,

ISO 19600

ISO 56002

Quick Verdict

ISO 19600

Key Features

ISO 56002

Key Features

Detailed Analysis

ISO 19600 Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

ISO 56002 Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

Key Differences

Scope

Industry

Nature

Testing

Penalties

Frequently Asked Questions

ISO 19600 FAQ

What is the primary objective of ISO 19600?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with ISO 19600?

Does ISO 19600 require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for ISO 19600 be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with ISO 19600?

Can ISO 19600 be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing ISO 19600?

ISO 56002 FAQ

What is the primary objective of ISO 56002?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with ISO 56002?

Does ISO 56002 require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for ISO 56002 be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with ISO 56002?

Can ISO 56002 be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing ISO 56002?

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

ISO 27701 2025 Update: Navigating Standalone Certification Myths, Audit Realities, and a 90-Day PIMS Launch Plan

SOC 2 for Fintech Startups: First 5 Steps to Compliance with Confidentiality Criterion Infographic

Image this: What if GDPR would have NOT been implemented by the EU

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

OSHA vs K-PIPA

AS9100 vs ISO 21001

Mastering ISO 27701 Annexes: Controller vs. Processor Controls with GDPR Mapping and Benchmarks