MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme) vs ISO 22301
MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)
China's mandatory graded cybersecurity protection for networks
ISO 22301
International standard for business continuity management systems
Quick Verdict
MLPS 2.0 mandates graded cybersecurity for China's network operators via levels and PSB enforcement, while ISO 22301 offers voluntary BCMS certification globally for resilience. Companies adopt MLPS for legal compliance; ISO for risk mitigation and trust.
MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)
Multi-Level Protection Scheme 2.0 (MLPS 2.0)
Key Features
- Five-level classification based on impact to national security
- Mandatory registration and expert review for Level 2+ systems
- Graded controls across physical, network, data, governance domains
- Enforced by Public Security Bureaus with fines and inspections
- Extended requirements for cloud, IoT, big data, ICS
ISO 22301
ISO 22301:2019 Business continuity management systems Requirements
Key Features
- PDCA cycle for continual BCMS improvement
- Business Impact Analysis to prioritize functions
- Leadership commitment and BCMS policy requirements
- Risk assessment and recovery strategy testing
- Annex SL integration with ISO 27001
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme) Details
What It Is
MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme 2.0) is China's mandatory cybersecurity regulation operationalizing Article 21 of the 2017 Cybersecurity Law. It classifies networks into five protection levels based on potential harm to national security, social order, and public interests, requiring graded technical, management, and physical controls per standards like GB/T 22239-2019.
Key Components
- Core domains: physical security, network protection, data security, security operations, governance.
- Common controls for all levels plus extended for cloud, IoT, big data, ICS.
- Compliance via self-assessment, expert review (Level 2+), PSB filing, third-party evaluations scoring ≥70%.
Why Organizations Use It
Mandated for all network operators in China; avoids fines, inspections, operational disruptions. Enhances risk management, rationalizes investments, builds regulatory trust, integrates with DSL/PIPL.
Implementation Overview
Phased roadmap: inventory/grading, gap analysis, remediation, evaluation, ongoing monitoring. Applies to all sizes/industries in China; high complexity demands local expertise, recurring audits.
ISO 22301 Details
What It Is
ISO 22301:2019 is the international standard titled Security and resilience — Business continuity management systems — Requirements. It specifies requirements for a Business Continuity Management System (BCMS) to protect against, reduce likelihood of, and recover from disruptions. Employs a risk-based approach via PDCA (Plan-Do-Check-Act) cycle and Annex SL high-level structure for flexibility across contexts.
Key Components
- 10 clauses (4-10 core): context, leadership, planning (BIA, risk assessment), support, operation (strategies, testing), evaluation (audits, reviews), improvement.
- No fixed controls; tailored to organization.
- Built on PDCA; certification every 3 years with annual surveillance.
Why Organizations Use It
- Builds resilience, minimizes downtime/financial losses.
- Meets regulatory needs (e.g., NIS Directive, NIST).
- Enhances risk management, stakeholder trust, reputation.
- Provides competitive edges like procurement advantages, lower insurance.
Implementation Overview
- Phased: gap analysis, BIA/RA, training, testing, audits.
- Applies to all sizes/sectors globally.
- Two-stage certification (6-8 weeks), tools accelerate (e.g., 60 days prep).
Key Differences
| Aspect | MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme) | ISO 22301 |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Cybersecurity for networks/systems | Business continuity management systems |
| Industry | All network operators in China | All industries worldwide |
| Nature | Mandatory Chinese regulation | Voluntary international certification |
| Testing | Third-party evaluations, annual for Level 3+ | Internal audits, exercises, certification audits |
| Penalties | Fines, blacklisting, operational suspension | Loss of certification, no legal penalties |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme) and ISO 22301
MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme) FAQ
ISO 22301 FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...
NIST CSF 2.0 Plain English Decoder: Translating Govern, Supply Chain, and Core Functions from Jargon to Actionable Insights
Demystify NIST CSF 2.0 jargon with plain English tables for Govern, Supply Chain & Core Functions. Actionable steps for risk oversight & vendor management. Empo
Thailand PDPA Implementation Guide: Subordinate Regulations for 72-Hour Breach Reporting and Cross-Border Transfers (2022-2024 Rules)
Step-by-step Thailand PDPA guide: 72-hour breach notifications, cross-border transfers (2022-2024 rules). Risk checklists, GDPR templates avoid THB 5M fines. Mu
From Reactive Gatekeeper to Proactive Strategist: How Compliance Software Reshapes the Compliance Professional's Day
Discover how compliance software automates monitoring, delivers real-time insights, and transforms compliance pros from reactive gatekeepers to proactive strate
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Explore More Comparisons
See how MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme) and ISO 22301 compare against other standards