WELL
Performance-based certification for occupant health in buildings
AS9110C
International standard for aircraft maintenance quality management systems.
Quick Verdict
WELL certifies buildings for occupant health via performance verification, while AS9110C ensures aerospace MRO quality through risk-based QMS. Companies adopt WELL for ESG/tenant appeal; AS9110C for regulatory compliance and contracts.
WELL
WELL v2 Building Standard
Key Features
- Mandatory on-site performance verification testing
- 10 core concepts with preconditions and optimizations
- People-first focus on occupant health outcomes
- Continuous monitoring pathways for compliance
- Tiered certifications via balanced point scoring
AS9110C
AS9110C: Quality Management Systems for Aviation Maintenance Organizations
Key Features
- Risk-based thinking embedded in planning and operations
- Configuration management and traceability controls
- Counterfeit parts prevention and detection
- Maintenance release and airworthiness requirements
- Human factors and organizational knowledge management
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
WELL Details
What It Is
WELL Building Standard v2 is a performance-based certification framework administered by the International WELL Building Institute (IWBI). It focuses on designing, operating, and verifying buildings to advance human health and well-being. Scope covers new/existing buildings across types like offices, residential, and hospitality. Key approach: evidence-based preconditions (mandatory) and optimizations (points-based) across 10 concepts.
Key Components
- **10 core conceptsAir, Water, Nourishment, Light, Movement, Thermal Comfort, Sound, Materials, Mind, Community (plus Innovation).
- 24 preconditions, 102 optimizations; total ~110 points possible.
- Built on public health research; certification tiers: Bronze (40 pts), Silver (50), Gold (60), Platinum (80) with concept minimums.
- Requires on-site performance verification and documentation review.
Why Organizations Use It
Drives occupant productivity, retention, ESG reporting; complements LEED. Mitigates health risks, boosts rents/values. Builds stakeholder trust via verified outcomes; voluntary but tenant-demanded.
Implementation Overview
Phased: gap analysis, scorecard, design/ops integration, verification, recertification (3 years). Cross-functional teams; applies globally to any size. Involves testing, monitoring, policies.
AS9110C Details
What It Is
AS9110C, or AS9110:2016 Rev C, is an international quality management system (QMS) standard for aviation maintenance, repair, and overhaul (MRO) organizations. It builds on ISO 9001:2015 with aerospace-specific requirements, using a risk-based thinking (RBT) and PDCA approach to ensure airworthiness and compliance.
Key Components
- Core clauses (4-10) covering context, leadership, planning, support, operation, evaluation, improvement.
- Aviation additions: configuration management, counterfeit parts prevention, human factors, maintenance release.
- Built on Annex SL HLS; requires documented evidence of operational QMS.
- Certification via accredited registrars with internal audits and management reviews.
Why Organizations Use It
- Meets customer/OEM contracts and regulatory alignments (FAA/EASA Part-145).
- Mitigates safety risks, reduces rework, improves on-time delivery.
- Enhances market access, supply-chain credibility, operational efficiency.
- Builds stakeholder trust through traceability and continual improvement.
Implementation Overview
- Phased: gap analysis, process design, training, pilots, audits, certification.
- Applies to MROs of all sizes globally; 6-12 months typical.
- Involves eQMS tools, IAQG training, mock audits for readiness. (178 words)
Key Differences
| Aspect | WELL | AS9110C |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Occupant health, well-being via 10 concepts (Air, Water, etc.) | Aerospace MRO QMS with maintenance, airworthiness controls |
| Industry | Buildings across all sectors (offices, residential, global) | Aviation maintenance organizations (civil/military, global) |
| Nature | Voluntary performance-based certification framework | Voluntary QMS certification standard (ISO 9001 tailored) |
| Testing | On-site performance verification, continuous monitoring | Internal audits, management reviews, registrar certification audits |
| Penalties | Loss of certification, no legal penalties | Loss of certification, regulatory/contractual risks |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about WELL and AS9110C
WELL FAQ
AS9110C FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

NIST CSF 2.0: Key Enhancements and How They Address Evolving Cyber Threats
Explore NIST CSF 2.0 updates: Govern function, supply chain security, SME playbooks for ransomware & AI threats. Boost your cyber defenses now!

CIS Controls v8.1 for Cloud & Kubernetes: A Practical Implementation Playbook (AWS/Azure/GCP + IaC)
Translate CIS Controls v8.1 to cloud-native: Kubernetes patterns for IAM, logging, vuln mgmt, hardening on AWS, Azure, GCP + IaC. Practical playbook for teams.

Singapore PDPA Implementation Guide: Mastering Part 6A Breach Notification Thresholds and Timelines from Primary Statute
Master Singapore PDPA Part 6A breach notifications: statutory thresholds (risk of significant harm), 72-hour timelines, checklists, templates & frameworks. Comp
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
PRINCE2 vs Australian Privacy Act
Discover PRINCE2 vs Australian Privacy Act: Compare governance-driven project method with privacy principles for compliant Aussie projects. Align & succeed now!
ENERGY STAR vs ISO 28000
Compare ENERGY STAR vs ISO 28000: EPA's efficiency benchmark (75+ score cuts 35% energy use) vs ISO's risk-based supply chain security system. Boost ops resilience—discover key diffs now!
ISO 27032 vs ISO 50001
Explore ISO 27032 vs ISO 50001: Cybersecurity guidelines for Internet threats vs energy management systems. Key differences, benefits & strategies for compliance. Dive in!