GRADUM
    FeaturesMaturity ModelsFor CreatorsPricingBlogCompareSupport
    DashboardSign Up Free
    Blog/Compare/ISO 22000 vs MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)
    Standards Comparison

    ISO 22000 vs MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)

    ISO 22000

    Voluntary
    2018

    International standard for food safety management systems

    VS

    MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)

    Mandatory
    N/A

    China's regulation for graded cybersecurity system protection

    Quick Verdict

    ISO 22000 provides voluntary global certification for food safety management, enabling supply chain trust. MLPS 2.0 mandates graded cybersecurity in China, enforced by PSBs with penalties. Companies adopt ISO 22000 for market access; MLPS for legal compliance.

    Food Safety

    ISO 22000

    ISO 22000:2018 Food safety management systems

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    6-12 months

    Key Features

    • High-Level Structure enables integrated management systems
    • Dual PDCA cycles for organizational and operational control
    • Integrates HACCP principles with full management system
    • Systematic categorization of PRPs, OPRPs, and CCPs
    • Interactive communication across entire food chain
    Standard

    MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)

    Multi-Level Protection Scheme 2.0

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    Medium
    Implementation Time
    12-18 months

    Key Features

    • Five-level classification by societal impact
    • Mandatory PSB registration for Level 2+
    • Third-party audits with 70/100 pass score
    • Extended controls for cloud and IoT
    • Ongoing law enforcement oversight

    Detailed Analysis

    A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

    ISO 22000 Details

    What It Is

    ISO 22000:2018 is an international certification standard for Food Safety Management Systems (FSMS). It applies to any organization in the food chain, providing a systematic framework to ensure safe products through hazard prevention, regulatory compliance, and chain communication. Built on risk-based thinking and HLS, it uses dual PDCA cycles for strategic and operational control.

    Key Components

    • Clauses 4-10 cover context, leadership, planning, support, operation, evaluation, improvement.
    • Core: PRPs, hazard analysis, CCPs/OPRPs, traceability, verification.
    • Integrates HACCP principles; requires documented hazard control plans.
    • Certification via accredited bodies with staged audits.

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Meets customer/regulatory demands; enables GFSI access via schemes like FSSC 22000.
    • Reduces recalls, enhances resilience, builds trust.
    • Strategic risk management; integrates with ISO 9001/14001.

    Implementation Overview

    • Phased: gap analysis, PRPs, hazard plans, training, audits.
    • Scalable for SMEs to multinationals; 6-18 months typical.
    • Involves cross-functional teams, validation, continual improvement.

    MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme) Details

    What It Is

    MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme 2.0) is China's legally enforceable cybersecurity regulation under the 2016 Cybersecurity Law. It mandates classifying information systems into five levels based on compromise impact to national security, social order, and public interests, applying graded technical, governance, and organizational controls.

    Key Components

    • Common controls in physical security, networks, data protection, operations
    • Level-specific baselines via GB/T standards (e.g., 22239-2019)
    • Extensions for cloud, IoT, big data, industrial systems
    • Third-party audits (≥70/100 score), PSB approval for Level 2+

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Mandatory compliance avoids fines, license suspensions, inspections
    • Strengthens risk management, resilience in China operations
    • Enables market access, procurement with SOEs/government
    • Builds regulator trust, aligns with data laws (DSL, PIPL)

    Implementation Overview

    Phased: classify systems, gap analysis, remediate controls, external audit, PSB filing, ongoing re-evaluations. Targets all China network operators; intensive for multinationals with Level 3+ systems.

    Key Differences

    AspectISO 22000MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)
    ScopeFood safety management systems across food chainGraded cybersecurity for all networks in China
    IndustryFood, feed, packaging, logistics globallyAll sectors operating networks in China
    NatureVoluntary international certification standardMandatory national regulation enforced by PSBs
    TestingCertification audits every 3 years, internal auditsThird-party evaluations, PSB inspections, re-evaluations
    PenaltiesLoss of certification, no legal finesFines, operational suspension, enforcement actions

    Scope

    ISO 22000
    Food safety management systems across food chain
    MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)
    Graded cybersecurity for all networks in China

    Industry

    ISO 22000
    Food, feed, packaging, logistics globally
    MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)
    All sectors operating networks in China

    Nature

    ISO 22000
    Voluntary international certification standard
    MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)
    Mandatory national regulation enforced by PSBs

    Testing

    ISO 22000
    Certification audits every 3 years, internal audits
    MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)
    Third-party evaluations, PSB inspections, re-evaluations

    Penalties

    ISO 22000
    Loss of certification, no legal fines
    MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)
    Fines, operational suspension, enforcement actions

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Common questions about ISO 22000 and MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)

    ISO 22000 FAQ

    MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme) FAQ

    You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

    Top 5 Reasons TISAX Tabletop Exercises Prevent €10M+ Supply Chain Breaches for ADAS Tier 1 Suppliers in 2025

    Top 5 Reasons TISAX Tabletop Exercises Prevent €10M+ Supply Chain Breaches for ADAS Tier 1 Suppliers in 2025

    Unlock top 5 reasons TISAX tabletop exercises deliver 4:1 ROI preventing €10M+ supply chain breaches for ADAS Tier 1 suppliers. ENX case studies & VDA ISA contr

    Top 10 SOC 2 Mistakes Startups Make (and Fixes with Automation)

    Top 10 SOC 2 Mistakes Startups Make (and Fixes with Automation)

    Avoid top 10 SOC 2 mistakes like scope creep & evidence gaps. See fail/pass visuals, client quotes, Vanta/Drata automation fixes for bootstrapped startups. Quic

    NIST CSF 2.0 Deep Dive: Mastering the Updated Framework Core Functions

    NIST CSF 2.0 Deep Dive: Mastering the Updated Framework Core Functions

    Unpack NIST CSF 2.0's enhanced Core Functions: Govern, Identify, Protect, Detect, Respond, Recover. Get SME playbooks, governance shifts & strategies for cyber

    Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

    Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

    Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

    100+ Standards & Regulations
    AI-Powered Insights
    Collaborative Assessments
    Actionable Recommendations

    Explore More Comparisons

    See how ISO 22000 and MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme) compare against other standards

    Other ISO 22000 Comparisons

    • WCAG vs ISO 22000
    • ENERGY STAR vs ISO 22000
    • ISO 50001 vs ISO 22000
    • BREEAM vs ISO 22000
    • EPA vs ISO 22000

    Other MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme) Comparisons

    • TISAX vs MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)
    • DORA vs MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)
    • PCI DSS vs MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)
    • CSL (Cyber Security Law of China) vs MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)
    • MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme) vs ISO 27018
    GRADUM

    Transform your assessment process with collaborative, AI-powered maturity evaluations that deliver actionable insights.

    Navigation

    FeaturesMaturity ModelsFor CreatorsPricing

    Legal

    Terms and ConditionsPrivacy PolicyImprintCopyright PolicyCookie Policy

    © 2026 Gradum. All Rights Reserved