ISO 26000
International guidance standard for social responsibility
EN 1090
EU standard for steel and aluminium structural execution
Quick Verdict
ISO 26000 offers voluntary guidance on social responsibility for all organizations globally, while EN 1090 mandates CE marking and FPC for EU structural steel/aluminium fabricators. Companies adopt ISO 26000 for ethical leadership; EN 1090 for legal market access.
ISO 26000
ISO 26000:2010 Guidance on social responsibility
Key Features
- Explicitly non-certifiable guidance standard
- Seven principles underpinning responsible behavior
- Seven core subjects for holistic coverage
- Stakeholder engagement drives prioritization
- Integrates with management systems universally
EN 1090
EN 1090: Execution of steel and aluminium structures
Key Features
- Risk-based Execution Classes (EXC1-EXC4)
- Factory Production Control (FPC) certification
- CE marking and Declaration of Performance
- Welding quality via ISO 3834 integration
- Material traceability and NDT requirements
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
ISO 26000 Details
What It Is
ISO 26000:2010 is a voluntary international guidance standard on social responsibility (SR), applicable to all organizations regardless of size, type, or location. Its primary purpose is to provide a shared definition, principles, and core subjects for assessing SR impacts, risks, and stakeholder expectations through holistic, context-based application rather than requirements.
Key Components
- **Seven principlesAccountability, transparency, ethical behavior, respect for stakeholder interests, rule of law, international norms, human rights.
- **Seven core subjectsOrganizational governance, human rights, labor practices, environment, fair operating practices, consumer issues, community involvement.
- Built on multi-stakeholder consensus; non-certifiable—no audits or conformity claims.
Why Organizations Use It
Enhances sustainability commitment, risk management, and credibility without certification burdens. Aligns with OECD, UNGPs, SDGs, GRI for ESG reporting, stakeholder trust, operational resilience, and competitive differentiation in procurement/investor relations.
Implementation Overview
Phased approach: materiality assessment, stakeholder engagement, integration into governance/operations (e.g., ISO 14001/45001). Key activities include prioritization, policy embedding, training, transparent reporting via Communication Protocol. Suited for all sectors; self-assessed progress.
EN 1090 Details
What It Is
EN 1090 is a harmonized European standard family (EN 1090-1, -2, -3) under the Construction Products Regulation (CPR). It governs execution and conformity assessment of structural steel and aluminium components/kits for construction works. Primary purpose: ensure controlled fabrication, welding, tolerances, and inspection via risk-based Execution Classes (EXC1-EXC4).
Key Components
- **EN 1090-1Conformity assessment, Factory Production Control (FPC) certification, Declaration of Performance (DoP), CE marking.
- **EN 1090-2/-3Technical rules for steel/aluminium (materials, welding per ISO 3834, tolerances, corrosion protection, NDT).
- Core: Risk-scaled requirements, traceability, qualified personnel. Certified by Notified Bodies with ongoing surveillance.
Why Organizations Use It
- Mandatory CE marking for EU market access; non-compliance risks exclusion, fines.
- Reduces liability, rework; builds trust via traceability/quality.
- Strategic: Enables high-risk projects (EXC3/4), competitive bidding.
Implementation Overview
Phased: Gap analysis, FPC build, welding quals, NB certification (3-12 months). Targets fabricators in EU/UK; medium-high complexity with audits/surveillance. (178 words)
Key Differences
| Aspect | ISO 26000 | EN 1090 |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Social responsibility guidance across 7 core subjects | Execution and conformity of steel/aluminium structures |
| Industry | All organizations, sectors, global applicability | Construction/metal fabrication, EU/EEA market |
| Nature | Voluntary non-certifiable guidance standard | Mandatory harmonized standard for CE marking |
| Testing | Self-assessment, stakeholder engagement, reporting | FPC certification, NB audits, surveillance |
| Penalties | No legal penalties, reputational risks only | Market exclusion, fines, legal liability |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about ISO 26000 and EN 1090
ISO 26000 FAQ
EN 1090 FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...
How to Implement CIS Controls v8.1 as a ‘Control Backbone’ for NIS2 & DORA (Step-by-Step Implementation Guide)
Deploy CIS Controls v8.1 as a control backbone for NIS2 & DORA compliance. Step-by-step roadmap (IG1→IG2), deliverables, metrics & evidence model for hybrid/clo
CIS Controls v8.1, Operationalized: Top 10 Reasons Compliance Monitoring Software Accelerates Real-World Implementation
Operationalize CIS Controls v8.1 with compliance monitoring software. Turn checklists into dashboards, tickets, and audit-proof workflows. Top 10 reasons it acc
Why applying the NIST CSF Standard is a Life-Saver!
Discover why NIST CSF 2.0 is a life-saver for organizations. This flexible framework's 6 functions—Govern, Identify, Protect, Detect, Respond, Recover—boost res
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
FISMA vs Basel III
Compare FISMA vs Basel III: U.S. federal cybersecurity (NIST RMF) meets global bank capital/liquidity rules. Decode compliance, risks & strategies. Boost resilience today!
HITRUST CSF vs LEED
Explore HITRUST CSF vs LEED: Cybersecurity assurance vs green building certification. Key differences, benefits & strategies for compliance, risk mgmt & sustainability success.
GRI vs FedRAMP
Unlock GRI vs FedRAMP: ESG impact reporting meets federal cloud security. Compare baselines, compliance paths & strategies for sustainability & gov contracts. Dive in!